<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ethics Alarms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethicsalarms.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethicsalarms.com</link>
	<description>An ethics commentary blog on current events and issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cleavage Ettiquette by Proam</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/22/cleavage-ettiquette/comment-page-1/#comment-33243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Proam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10809#comment-33243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog is one of the few places on the Internet where I actually BEHAVE.  Now after reading the post and all the guys’ comments, I feel like Yosemite Sam at Fort Knox in the Bugs Bunny-as-gold-detector-rabbit cartoon.  (If you missed that one, you missed some great laughs.)

OhhHHHHHH NO YA DON’T!  I’m not gonna look.  Jack, you’re not gonna make me look.  JACK, I’m NOT gonna LET you MAKE me LOOK!  AwwwwWWWW......CRAP! (click)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog is one of the few places on the Internet where I actually BEHAVE.  Now after reading the post and all the guys’ comments, I feel like Yosemite Sam at Fort Knox in the Bugs Bunny-as-gold-detector-rabbit cartoon.  (If you missed that one, you missed some great laughs.)</p>
<p>OhhHHHHHH NO YA DON’T!  I’m not gonna look.  Jack, you’re not gonna make me look.  JACK, I’m NOT gonna LET you MAKE me LOOK!  AwwwwWWWW&#8230;&#8230;CRAP! (click)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The  Girl Scouts, the Loyal Wife, and &#8220;Wisconsin Sickness&#8221; by Jack Marshall</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/21/the-girl-scouts-the-loyal-wifeand-wisconsin-sickness/comment-page-1/#comment-33242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10787#comment-33242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, it&#039;s the value the obsessed person puts on it. I&#039;ll stipulate: a website as elaborate as Wisconsin Sickness shows obsession, whether it is about peeps, Arthur Miller, the Tampa Bay Rays, Obama, or Ed Gein.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s the value the obsessed person puts on it. I&#8217;ll stipulate: a website as elaborate as Wisconsin Sickness shows obsession, whether it is about peeps, Arthur Miller, the Tampa Bay Rays, Obama, or Ed Gein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The  Girl Scouts, the Loyal Wife, and &#8220;Wisconsin Sickness&#8221; by Jack Marshall</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/21/the-girl-scouts-the-loyal-wifeand-wisconsin-sickness/comment-page-1/#comment-33241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10787#comment-33241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was, if I recall, originally talking about Halloween, and Halloween obsessions only. Serial killers are a perfectly legitimate obsession, if off-putting and weird. My fault for going back to THAT obsession for the baseball/football comparison. (I was kidding about the America&#039;s sport bit. Yes, clearly irrelevant.) I&#039;m sorry. I misrepresented my  train of thought, and so misunderstood yours.

The gay bias in the Boy Scouts is just ignorant bigotry---gays are not child molesters, and only the bigoted and ignorant think they are. (Jerry Sandusky&#039;s not gay) Now, if a Scout Leader has an elaborate  website &lt;em&gt;celebrating&lt;/em&gt; famous child molesters because he is interested in them, would that be enough to tell him to take a hike? You don&#039;t think so? I do.

I &lt;strong&gt;agree&lt;/strong&gt; with you---it&#039;s 99.9% ick, which is why the Girl Scouts would be wrong to fire an &lt;em&gt;employee&lt;/em&gt; over the website. But ick can be sufficient to make a group justifiably uncomfortable, making the rejection of a volunteer reasonable, and even resposnible 

Eva Braun is ick, too, right? Do you think the Jewish Lady&#039;s Cotillion has to take her on?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was, if I recall, originally talking about Halloween, and Halloween obsessions only. Serial killers are a perfectly legitimate obsession, if off-putting and weird. My fault for going back to THAT obsession for the baseball/football comparison. (I was kidding about the America&#8217;s sport bit. Yes, clearly irrelevant.) I&#8217;m sorry. I misrepresented my  train of thought, and so misunderstood yours.</p>
<p>The gay bias in the Boy Scouts is just ignorant bigotry&#8212;gays are not child molesters, and only the bigoted and ignorant think they are. (Jerry Sandusky&#8217;s not gay) Now, if a Scout Leader has an elaborate  website <em>celebrating</em> famous child molesters because he is interested in them, would that be enough to tell him to take a hike? You don&#8217;t think so? I do.</p>
<p>I <strong>agree</strong> with you&#8212;it&#8217;s 99.9% ick, which is why the Girl Scouts would be wrong to fire an <em>employee</em> over the website. But ick can be sufficient to make a group justifiably uncomfortable, making the rejection of a volunteer reasonable, and even resposnible </p>
<p>Eva Braun is ick, too, right? Do you think the Jewish Lady&#8217;s Cotillion has to take her on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The  Girl Scouts, the Loyal Wife, and &#8220;Wisconsin Sickness&#8221; by tgt</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/21/the-girl-scouts-the-loyal-wifeand-wisconsin-sickness/comment-page-1/#comment-33240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10787#comment-33240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The difference between an obsession and an interest is the value judgment you put on the behavior. That&#039;s it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between an obsession and an interest is the value judgment you put on the behavior. That&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The  Girl Scouts, the Loyal Wife, and &#8220;Wisconsin Sickness&#8221; by tgt</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/21/the-girl-scouts-the-loyal-wifeand-wisconsin-sickness/comment-page-1/#comment-33239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10787#comment-33239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yea, but the birth of that was clearly in response to my comment that her style matches that of idiots. 


More importantly, I nominate SMP to be Thursty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, but the birth of that was clearly in response to my comment that her style matches that of idiots. </p>
<p>More importantly, I nominate SMP to be Thursty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The  Girl Scouts, the Loyal Wife, and &#8220;Wisconsin Sickness&#8221; by tgt</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/21/the-girl-scouts-the-loyal-wifeand-wisconsin-sickness/comment-page-1/#comment-33238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10787#comment-33238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) I know my baseball. From McGraw to Mack to Franco, from Ty Cobb to Manny. Honestly, I have more books about baseball stadiums from the turn of the 20th century sitting on my bookshelves than should rightfully exist in a sane world. 

That was an intentional parallel to the shallowness of your comment, and your response, while missing my point, displayed it well.

I don&#039;t see how you missed the drama comment. Wisconsin sickness is all about the drama. You know what else I guess doesn&#039;t have drama? Theatre. 

2) That something has cultural significance does not mean that it is currently good or that something else is bad. Much of that significance is also due to the popularity of baseball. Just because it&#039;s America&#039;s sport does not make it non juvenile. You&#039;re actually implying here that popularity implies importance. By that token, you&#039;re quickly losing on Halloween, but I digress.

3) I resent that. You&#039;re analogy was bad. You might as well have pitted Microsoft and Apple. The gambling analogy also fails, as gambling directly goes to the fairness of the game. 

I get what you&#039;re saying about trust, but it&#039;s mistaken. Wisconsin sickness does not celebrate and support killing and abuse of women. That&#039;s as accurate as saying Baseball celebrates concrete bunkers. There is no values clash. This is ick factor, pure and simple. It&#039;s icky and stupid on it&#039;s face, so make it go away.

The best I can do is compare this to BSA and gay scout leaders, and that&#039;s a bit of a stretch already. In that case, the BSA is true to their values to get rid of gay scout leaders, but horribly wrong anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I know my baseball. From McGraw to Mack to Franco, from Ty Cobb to Manny. Honestly, I have more books about baseball stadiums from the turn of the 20th century sitting on my bookshelves than should rightfully exist in a sane world. </p>
<p>That was an intentional parallel to the shallowness of your comment, and your response, while missing my point, displayed it well.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how you missed the drama comment. Wisconsin sickness is all about the drama. You know what else I guess doesn&#8217;t have drama? Theatre. </p>
<p>2) That something has cultural significance does not mean that it is currently good or that something else is bad. Much of that significance is also due to the popularity of baseball. Just because it&#8217;s America&#8217;s sport does not make it non juvenile. You&#8217;re actually implying here that popularity implies importance. By that token, you&#8217;re quickly losing on Halloween, but I digress.</p>
<p>3) I resent that. You&#8217;re analogy was bad. You might as well have pitted Microsoft and Apple. The gambling analogy also fails, as gambling directly goes to the fairness of the game. </p>
<p>I get what you&#8217;re saying about trust, but it&#8217;s mistaken. Wisconsin sickness does not celebrate and support killing and abuse of women. That&#8217;s as accurate as saying Baseball celebrates concrete bunkers. There is no values clash. This is ick factor, pure and simple. It&#8217;s icky and stupid on it&#8217;s face, so make it go away.</p>
<p>The best I can do is compare this to BSA and gay scout leaders, and that&#8217;s a bit of a stretch already. In that case, the BSA is true to their values to get rid of gay scout leaders, but horribly wrong anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics Quiz: The Strange Case of Mitt Romney and the Posthumous Jewish Baptisms by Jack Marshall</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/15/ethics-quiz-the-strange-case-of-mitt-romney-and-the-posthumous-jewish-baptisms/comment-page-1/#comment-33237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10659#comment-33237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not much, is my guess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much, is my guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The  Girl Scouts, the Loyal Wife, and &#8220;Wisconsin Sickness&#8221; by Jack Marshall</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/21/the-girl-scouts-the-loyal-wifeand-wisconsin-sickness/comment-page-1/#comment-33236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10787#comment-33236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, it&#039;s become about the lame and irrational arguments put forth by those commenting about it. You, for example, have nothing to offer but name calling.

By the way, I support the right of Charlie and Stacy to groove on Gein, Dahmer, Manson, Jack the Ripper, whoever turns them on. They just can&#039;t complain if that makes them unattractive as Scout volunteers. Nothing snobbish about it at all. Hey, outside of all the murder stuff, Ed gave us some great scary movies! Not sure his victims agree that it&#039;s a good trade, but hey! Live and let...uh, no, that doesn&#039;t really work here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s become about the lame and irrational arguments put forth by those commenting about it. You, for example, have nothing to offer but name calling.</p>
<p>By the way, I support the right of Charlie and Stacy to groove on Gein, Dahmer, Manson, Jack the Ripper, whoever turns them on. They just can&#8217;t complain if that makes them unattractive as Scout volunteers. Nothing snobbish about it at all. Hey, outside of all the murder stuff, Ed gave us some great scary movies! Not sure his victims agree that it&#8217;s a good trade, but hey! Live and let&#8230;uh, no, that doesn&#8217;t really work here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics Quiz: The Strange Case of Mitt Romney and the Posthumous Jewish Baptisms by Sonia</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/15/ethics-quiz-the-strange-case-of-mitt-romney-and-the-posthumous-jewish-baptisms/comment-page-1/#comment-33235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10659#comment-33235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would the Mormons like it if their dead ancestors were converted into, let&#039;s say,  Islam by similarly crazy Islam groups?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would the Mormons like it if their dead ancestors were converted into, let&#8217;s say,  Islam by similarly crazy Islam groups?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The  Girl Scouts, the Loyal Wife, and &#8220;Wisconsin Sickness&#8221; by Jack Marshall</title>
		<link>http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/02/21/the-girl-scouts-the-loyal-wifeand-wisconsin-sickness/comment-page-1/#comment-33234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicsalarms.com/?p=10787#comment-33234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am definitely not biased about the contents of &quot;Wisconsin Sickness&quot; in the least. Now you&#039;re crying bias, because your arguments are incoherent. Of COURSE the website is obsessive. It&#039;s complex and took a lot of work; it is a work of obsession. It&#039;s obvious. People don&#039;t erect high-quality online shrines to something they don&#039;t care about. A website that is substantially about cannibalism and serial killers, with photos of women being abused, is obviously obsessed with violence. What do you think it&#039;s about, marzipan?

You know, as tgt suggested, I can often gauge whether there is a legitimate counter argument by the quality of discourse displayed by those who disagree with me. You&#039;re making me feel more confident every time--and you just called your best ally a &quot;moron.&quot; Keep it up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am definitely not biased about the contents of &#8220;Wisconsin Sickness&#8221; in the least. Now you&#8217;re crying bias, because your arguments are incoherent. Of COURSE the website is obsessive. It&#8217;s complex and took a lot of work; it is a work of obsession. It&#8217;s obvious. People don&#8217;t erect high-quality online shrines to something they don&#8217;t care about. A website that is substantially about cannibalism and serial killers, with photos of women being abused, is obviously obsessed with violence. What do you think it&#8217;s about, marzipan?</p>
<p>You know, as tgt suggested, I can often gauge whether there is a legitimate counter argument by the quality of discourse displayed by those who disagree with me. You&#8217;re making me feel more confident every time&#8211;and you just called your best ally a &#8220;moron.&#8221; Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
