Something is seriously amiss in Kansas.
1. Using Taxpayer Funds To Clone The Cleavers
Beve, June, Wally, Ward…I’m so sorry you got pulled into this…
Are there conservatives who can’t see how hypocritical, presumptuous and wrong this is?
I know one who doesn’t, at least: Kansas State Sen. Forrest Knox ( R-Altoona), who has introduced Senate Bill 158 . It will use the power of money to persuade foster parents to live like a “Leave it to Beaver” family. That’s Knox’s description, not mine.
Senate Bill 158 creates a “special category” known as licensed CARE families, who can receive “substantially higher” pay from the state than foster families who don’t qualify.
According to the language of SB 158, a CARE family is…
- A husband and wife team married for at least seven years,
- …in a faithful, loving and caring relationship and
- …with no sexual relations outside of the marriage
- …no current use of tobacco by anyone in the family’s home
- …no alcoholic liquor or cereal malt beverages in the family’s home
- …either the husband or wife, or both, does not work outside the home; and
- …the family is involved in a social group larger than the family that meets regularly, preferably at least weekly.
In other words, if I really have to spell it out, “church.” The law can’t say church, because that would violate the Bill of Rights. I suppose they could all join a cult. Continue reading
God bless America.
In policy debates over contentious issues like abortion, national health care, and capital punishment, a common argument, brandished like a flag , is that the United States is out of step with the rest of the world. My reflex reaction to that claim, when I can resist the impulse to say, “Good!”, is to point out that the rest of the world has never lacked for enthusiasms for terrible ideas, and the United States, by going in its own direction, has often been unique, innovative, and right.
Still, a bad idea abroad will inevitably inspire some enterprising social architect here to propose it, and a legislator to try to make it law. Thus, when possible, it is wise to try to identify and reject the most sinister examples of Europe being Europe before anyone here starts trying to play “me too.” In the case of Europe’s current push to create a so-called “right to be forgotten” on the internet, some very effective critics are on the case. Continue reading
“Trump Fumbles Abortion Question” trumpeted “The Daily Beast” under the label “Confused”. It caused my heart to leap: could The Donald have stuck his foot in his mouth with an obnoxious-presidential-campaign-flirtation-destroying gaffe so soon? Callooh! Callay!
I rushed to the link, which was on the NBC News site, only to have my hopes dashed. Trump hadn’t made a gaffe at all. Some biased, ignorant NBC reporter, who has decided that it is her life’s assignment to show the American public just who is and who isn’t qualified to run for President of the United States, tried a deceitful and unfair trick question on Trump, who promptly identified it as such. Then, completely mistaken about her assumption that his answer was disqualifying at all, she smugly sat back while her colleagues in the media attempt to present the exchange as a “gotcha.” In other words, Trump is going to get the Sarah Palin treatment, and this was the first, jaw-droppingly stupid attempt at it. Phooey! It’s bad enough that I keep having to stand up for Palin; now I have to stand up for—ughhh!–-Donald Trump!
Here is part of NBC’s Vaughn Ververs’ account of the exchange between NBC’s Savannah Guthrie and Trump: Continue reading