“Cecil the lion’s killer donated to Romney”
Yup. This really was the headline, and the story under it really had nothing more valuable to offer.
You know what? I’m willing to bet that at least one of those Planned Parenthood execs caught on video talking about crunching unborn baby skulls donated to Barack Obama’s campaign. Or have given money to Hillary’s campaign.
Or have bought Barbra Streisand CDs. Or like cheese.
What possible relevance to anything is this jerk’s political donation record from three years ago? What does this headline mean? Is Romney a lion-killer? Is the Republican Party now implicated in Cecil’s death? How is this conceivably news, since only an imbecile would see any relationship between the two acts: giving to a political campaign and shooting a beloved lion?
It is interesting, I suppose, that The Hill employs at least two imbeciles: the one who wrote this piece, and the editor who didn’t toss it in the trash.
Now if Cecil the lion had donated to Romney, THAT would have been news.