Big Stupid In Little Miami

In this public school story out of Ohio, the only ones who didn’t embarrass themselves were two suspended students.

When the Little Miami High School football team took the field in the Hamilton Township on September 11, one player carried a Thin Blue Line flag and another a Thin Red Line flag alongside the American flag. The boys, Brady Williams, and Jarad Bentley, were honoring their fathers as well as the first responders in the Twin Towers tragedy. Williams’ father is a police officer, and his son said he wanted to honor all the cops who lost their lives trying to save others on 9/11. Bentley’s father is a firefighter. “If it had been him killed on 9/11, I would have wanted someone to do it for him,” he said.

The gesture got both students suspended indefinitely. Their mistake, according to school officials: asking for permission, and carrying the flags on the field anyway after they were turned down.  “We can’t have students who decide to do something anyway after they’ve been told that they shouldn’t be doing it,” said the school’s athletic director. But why was a gesture of respect to first responders deemed inappropriate on the anniversary of the attacks? The athletic director says he saw the flags as  political, presumably in the context of the George Floyd Freakout.  “We did not want to place ourselves in a circumstance where another family might want a different flag to come out of the tunnel, one that may be [one that] many other families may not agree with from a political perspective,” he said.

I wonder if a student carrying a Black Lives Matter flag would have been treated as harshly. (No I don’t.)

The students told reporters that they were prepared to be punished for defying the school, and were willing to accept the consequences in order to salute police and firefighters.

The indefinite suspension lasted all of one day. It was quickly reversed by the school board after the story went national. There was a demonstration in support of the suspended players outside the school along with almost a million protesting emails and social media posts sent the school’s way. The school board released a statement saying its investigation showed they boys did not have political motivations and they would be returned to active status.

Yes, the school board required an “investigation” to convince them that honoring police and firefighters on 9-11 wasn’t “political.”

Ethics Verdicts:

  • The two boys are in the clear. They properly asked permission to display the flags, were denied, and concluding that the denial was unjust, engaged in civil disobedience to make a point. Perfect. They called attention to craven and incompetent school management as well as engaging in an unassailable gesture honoring their fathers’ professions on a day on which doing so is natural and appropriate.
  • We know why the boys proposal was ruled “political.” They were two white boys, and the weenie athletic director was worried that a Black Lives Matter mob would arrive on his front yard, because if you aren’t calling cops racist killers, you’re promoting systemic racism. Or he was worried that black players on the team would demand to carry out a BLM flag in the next game. His decision was ethically incompetent, because he didn’t play Ethics Chess, and discern what the next likely moves would be if the players brought out the flags anyway. The publicity was predictable, and the protests were predictable.
  • “With everything that’s going on with the NFL and what they’re doing, and then they pull this on those kids?” said one local resident to reporters. Bingo. How could the school not see that observation coming?
  • Suspending or otherwise punishing students for defying a school directive not to carry the flags, however, was still necessary and appropriate. The indefinite suspension was excessively harsh; it could and should have been reduced. If the boys’ punishment had been relatively minor and symbolic, the whole foofaraw might have been avoided.
  • Instead, the school board abandoned the punishment entirely, sending the unmistakable message that as long as enough people complain, it will abandon its principles…unlike Brady Williams, and Jarad Bentley.

15 thoughts on “Big Stupid In Little Miami

  1. The boys were also willing to suffer the penalty of their actions. Granted what kid doesn’t want to miss out on school but I think that says a lot about their character. So much of the violence that is happening now is hidden behind A mask.

  2. Two thinking students, they should be given degrees and removed from the school system as soon as possible! Meanwhile, many of the college students are taking the part of Checkov on Star Trek. A lot of the students in classes these days were taught that the Soviets were the first ones to invent space flight and we stole the technology from them, for example. Is this in Zinn’s History of the US or is it the 1619 Project?

    Shame on you Miami. Of course, this is probably because (not despite of) the location of one of the best public universities nearby.

      • One of Chekov’s roles was to make fun of the Soviet tendency to claim that a Russian actually invented something just before the accepted inventor.
        Usage
        Spock: “The first powered flight of a heavier than air craft on Earth was by the Wright Brothers in the year 1903.”
        Chekov: “Actually, the Russian Boris Borisinoff did it 2 years earlier.”

        When I mention something that was invented or discovered by an American or European the students think it was done by someone else first and ‘appropriated’ by the US or by Western Civilization. Their teachers are using the same type of revisionist ‘histories’ the Soviet Union did.

  3. I am curious to know what was written on the banner that these boys ran through. If it was a political banner of some sort, and if they did intentionally run through it, then it could be said that, despite their denial, that their demonstration was *political*.

    A far easier and a better solution would have been — there should have been no doubt or hesitation — to allow them to appear on the field. That they were excluded was political. And it produced a political reaction: to disobey the order and to make their display.

      • No, I just looked closer. One say ‘Sparks R Flyin’ or something like that. I guess that is not a political speech banner. So, running through it was not to disrupt whatever that speech was. Perhaps it just happened that way, accidentally?

        • They were almost certainly supposed to run through the banner. This is a common sports thing, a way for the team to make a big entrance. My guess is everything in that video is what was supposed to happen, except the two boys in question swapped out the American flags they were supposed to carry for the red line and blue line flags.

    • The banner they ran through had “Sparks R Flying – Spartans R Crying” written on it. They played the Turpin High School Spartans.

  4. I am from the area, and have family and friends still living there. It wouldn’t surprise me if a BLM flag would have been denied also; now it can’t be which may have been some of the motivation behind denying these flags. It also wouldn’t surprise me if there are no black players on Little Miami’s team.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.