Andrew Sullivan Points Out The Obvious Inconvenient Facts Like They Are A Revelation, But Since He’s Not A Conservative, Maybe Progressives And The News Media Will Accept Reality

death after Floyd


In his latest essay on substack, once-conservative-blogger-turned-progressive-shill (because he cared about gay marriage more than anything else)-turned-independent-gadfly Andrew Sullivan demonstrates in detail that what Ethics Alarms (and everyone else paying attention) knew would happen has, in fact, happened. If we ruin every police officer who shoots a black citizen in the line of duty, and allow Black Lives Matter to demonize such officers regardless of the circumstances, we get dangerously hesitant law enforcement, passive policing, more crimes by blacks and and police actively avoiding confrontations with black suspects.

Well, of course. This isn’t hard. But Andrew, a moderate at heart, is a kind-of progressive and always hated Donal Trump, so at least he won’t be accused of “mouthing Fox News talking points” when he states the obvious. Sullivan is also smart, a fine writer, and knows how to make a case, but during the Great Stupid in the course of the George Floyd Ethics Train Wreck, Facts Don’t Matter. But at least he tries. His case, however, is a bit like arguing that the night follows day.

His careful if annoying article deserves a full read, but here are some excerpts and some comments.

Let’s begin with data quoted by the Times,and in turn by Sullivan:

“Homicide rates in large cities were up more than 30 percent on average last year, and up another 24 percent for the beginning of this year, according to criminologists … Homicides in Portland, Ore., rose to 53 from 29, up more than 82 percent; in Minneapolis, they grew to 79 from 46, up almost 72 percent; and in Los Angeles the number increased to 351 from 258, a 36 percent climb … Homicides in Philadelphia are up almost 28 percent, with 170 through May 9, compared with 133 in the same period last year; in Tucson, Ariz., the number jumped to 30 from 17 through May 13, an increase of 76 percent.”

After considering and rejecting other explanations (In a typical Times bit of misdirection, a headline today reads “As Virus Recedes, Mayors Confront An Old Adversary: Rising Crime.” It’s the pandemic’s fault, and if it isn’t, this is nothing new!), Sullivan (correctly) fingers the George Floyd incident:

Before Floyd, no big increase in homicides, aggravated assaults, and shootings. After, a huge spike.Of course, that is not causation. But it’s one hell of a correlation — and no other event seems relevant. It’s as if the Floyd murder, and the subsequent urban chaos, sent a signal: the cops are on the defensive. Which means murderers can go on the offensive. And once lawlessness establishes itself, it tends to compound. A few gang murders can soon morph into tit-for-tat urban warfare.”

Gee, ya think?

“In Minneapolis, for example…murder jumped after Floyd’s murder, but shootings and aggravated assaults also went through the roof. In Chicago, the murder rate was the same on 5/28/2020 as on 5/28/2019: 191 homicides compared with 192. Then the murder rate and shootings took a sharp leap upward, and stayed there. You see nearly the same pattern in Philadelphia. New York City is a less clear-cut case, with surges in murder before and after the Floyd killing, but with shootings increasing 177 percent after the protests and riots. Shootings may be a better indicator of the scale of violence, because not all attempted homicides succeed.

The graph above shows the shootings in Minneapolis last year, BF and AF (before and after Floyd). And, I am constrained to say yet again, all of this death and destruction happened because one political party and a Marxist, racist organization deemed it in their interests to call Floyd’s death an example of systemic racism, when no evidence of racism had been found and has ever been found. And the news media let them establish the false narrative, indeed they pushed it.

Andrew again:

“Across America, many marchers and protestors yelled abuse at any cop they saw, and in some cities, they were given free rein, even to the extent of a no-go police zone. “ACAB” — “All Cops Are Bastards” — was routinely spray-painted. Mayors let the chaos go on — and elite institutions, like the New York Times, fired their own opinion editor for running a piece urging a federal intervention if the violence got even more out of hand. Non-white cops (a significant and rising number in many cities) were put in an incredibly tough spot. After this relentless assault, regular police officers noticed. Many quit…”

This was completely predictable, and many predicted it, as well as predicting that the exodus would lead to increased crime.

[P]olice pulled back from the kind of aggressive, pro-active policing that has been shown to be most helpful in reducing fatal civilian shootings — but also most likely to lead to fatal encounters with the police. In Minneapolis, for example, “police stops and officer-initiated calls dropped more than half, use-of-force incidents fell by two-thirds while traffic-related incidents and patrols became far less common.” Residents complained that the cops were slow to come, or were in the neighborhoods with their windows upIt wasn’t a policy of pull-back. But it was the reality among cops increasingly skittish toward risking their lives — because they feared getting vilified if something went wrong.

Apparently the Left thought police were stupid as well as racist. Who wouldn’t behave this way? Sullivan then writes, perhaps tongue-in-cheek, at least I hope so:

“Cops can and perhaps should be blamed for this kind of reticence. They should do their job regardless of the pressures.”

Seriously, Andrew? Would you do a dangerous and soul-crushing, low-paying job if the very people you were doing it for would demand that you be fired, prosecuted, tried and locked up because one group of suspects automatically resisted arrest and created dangerous and uncertain situations that required instant decision-making that sometimes led to tragedy? I wouldn’t! I’d say, “You know what? If the perp is black, I’m looking the other way. NFL players are kneeling to demand that I be presumed guilty if things go south. Businesses are using “Black Lives Matter” as a virtue-signaling stunt, and it translates into: “if a black criminal or suspect gets hurt or killed while committing a crime or resisting arrest, the police officer is a homicidal brute who must be sacrificed to the God of Systemic Racism.” To hell with that!”

Andrew can be a bit of weenie, and that statement about cops doing their duty anyway is a classic. He’s hedging his bets in case the Woke mob comes for him (and it might). So as quickly as he sticks it in, Sullivan goes back to reality:

“The homicide wave began with the Floyd murder and has been sustained by the decision of many cops to refrain from the kind of pro-active policing that can lead to exactly the kind of incidents that can become viral — aggressive intervention against armed criminals before they kill. That helps explain why the crime wave is restricted to shootings and homicides — because other more mundane police activities do not carry the same kind of risk to the officer or perpetrator involved.This is precisely what occurred in what’s called “The Ferguson Effect” — but this time, it may be happening on a national scale, as protests have covered the entire country, amid unprecedented pressure on the cops to avoid dangerous interactions.”

Ah, yes, “The Ferguson Effect,” after another blameless cop threatened while trying to control and arrest a massive perp had his life destroyed because of a lie (“Hands up! Don’t shoot!”) that was reported as fact by the news media and used by Black Lives Matter to raise funds and support. (The lie is not on the BLM website any more, but Mike Brown is still accorded martyr status.) What was the response by the rioters and communities attacked after the lesson of that debacle seemed clear? Why more riots and more capitulation by city governments, of course, along with the suspension of a Derek Chavin’s right to a fair trial in order to ensure his conviction.

Sullivan concludes,

“What if we can indeed lower police shootings — but only if police stay out of exactly the proactive policing that makes them more likely? And what if the price of ending proactive policing is, logically, a huge increase in civilian homicides? A look at the comparative numbers of black deaths at the hands of cops (in 2019, for example, 250), and black deaths at the hand of civilians (in 2019, 7,484) is a sobering reality check. Black Lives Matter could be devastating news for actual black lives.”

Not to be excessively arch, but “What was your first clue, Sherlock?”

This is not an argument against police reform or even against shifting some core responsibilities — mental health incidents, for example — to other kinds of professionals. It is an argument that pro-active policing has been more important in restraining crime than many have acknowledged; that removing it, before reforming the entire system, is extremely dangerous; and that elite complacency in the face of lawlessness and destruction in the summer of 2020 helped ignite a cycle of murder that is very hard to unwind. When crimes are committed with impunity, more crimes will be committed. And the victims will not be at Yale. So this scenario prompts a question of supreme irony: what if the final legacy of Black Lives Matter is that it actually succeeds in its core goal, and that in the future, far fewer African-Americans are shot by the cops. And what if the price of this symbolic victory is, in fact, a huge increase in the numbers of innocent black lives lost to civilian murder?

Yeah…”What if?” Sullivan also punts by resorting to one of those empty “ramalamadingdong” bits of progressive chanting when the Left has no practical solutions, just complaints: “police reform.” (Examples in the handbook “sensible gun control,” “immigration reform,” “safe spaces” and “inclusiveness,” among others. Yes, “systemic racism” too.) Still, facts are facts.

It’s a shame they Don’t Matter.

18 thoughts on “Andrew Sullivan Points Out The Obvious Inconvenient Facts Like They Are A Revelation, But Since He’s Not A Conservative, Maybe Progressives And The News Media Will Accept Reality

  1. What we need is a one-day complete stand-down of all law enforcement in this country. THEN maybe people will start to figure it out.

      • Not exactly the same, but close. I think Americans might rethink things if suddenly 911 went dead and every officer vanished from the street. Suddenly there’s no one to hold your dad with the oxygen as he suffers a heart attack until the paramedics can get there. Suddenly there’s no one to stop Stanley from whaling on Stella when she’s a little later with dinner. Suddenly no one comes to the scene of the auto accident to take a report and make sure pissed-off motorists don’t physically go after one another. Suddenly the gangs rule the streets. Suddenly no one comes to stop four shiftless 18yos from stealing the local convenience store owner blind or help a woman escape from a rape gang. Suddenly no one stops the carjacking from ratcheting up to murder. Oh yeah, this would be a great world to be part of. Sometimes you have to give people what they say they want in order to let them see for themselves why it’s a bad idea.

            • Such a thing would encourage vigilantism.


              What is the difference between a cop and a vigilante?

              It is not the uniform.

              It is not the badge.

              It is that they perform theirt duties in fighting crime under regular, transparent procedures.

              They must follow the law.

              And those among them who commit misconduct must be held accountable.

              In the absence of these, they are just vigilantes.

              The appeal of ‘defunding the police” is clear.

              One other thing to note is that the primary deterrent against vigilantism is not fear of criminal punishment nor retaliation by criminals’ friends and family.

              It is the belief that the police operate in accordance with law.

              when the police are perceived to be acting like vigilantes…

              • It’s not like what happened last summer didn’t encourage vigilantism. When the police are told to stand down and let riots rage, ordinary people have no choice but to take action themselves. Yet Lori Lightfoot had the audacity to tell Chicago’s citizens NOT to use whatever weapons they had to defend themselves against mobs. A cop has to follow rules of engagement, and can’t just open fire or deliberately shoot to kill. Someone defending his property can throw the rule book out the window and put a bullet right in your head if you cross his gate. Or he might not wait for that. It’s not supposed to come to that. Yes, someone like George Floyd is supposed to get taken into custody for due process, not get his face pressed into the street for 10 minutes. However, I’m also supposed to go about my activities of daily life without being afraid an angry mob will come after me for the color of my skin. I’m supposed to be able to count on the authorities to quell that kind of thing before it gets out of control. I’m also supposed to be able to count on the authorities to punish someone who injures me or damages my property.

                How do you think someone who sees his store burned and the business he worked years to build go up in smoke, then gets told the DA decided not to prosecute is going to feel? He didn’t do anything. He played by the rules. Now his business and livelihood lie in ashes, his life is ruined, no one is going to be punished for it, and no one is going to help him rebuild his life. Just what is he supposed to do? Who is he supposed to put his faith in? The police who failed to protect him? The politicians who treated him like he didn’t matter? The prosecutors who seemed more interested in enabling criminal behavior than punishing it? Can you blame him if, when he is able to rebuild his life and business, he brandishes a sawed-off shotgun and says he’s going to “mow down the next punk who comes near him?”

                • Officer’s didn’t help their popularity on the right when they seem to go after self defence cases with vigor. They will turn a blind eye to blm / antifia, but a citizend doesn’t dare stand up to them or they will pay at the hand of the state. I know the lack of action against blm / antifa is driven from the top, but officers, who’ve gotten good at the blue flu, could resist the attempts to police self defence. Yet they didn’t.

                  • Such a thing can only escalate sentiment in favor of defunding the police.

                    Having no police better than a police who only punish those who defend themselves from violent thugs.

                    I am not sure if the Japanese Imperial Army in China went to that extreme.

  2. Before George: 4,500 BC. – May 25, 2020; officially ending at 9:25 pm.
    After George: Year 0, beginning 9:30 pm, May 25, 2020 – Forever.

    In the year of 2014, George of the Floyd moved to Minnesota, entering the city gates triumphantly in the back of 2008 Chevy Malibu, where he was greeted with songs of praise and palm branches. A mere 6 years later, he was handed over to the Minneapolis Police Department and executed for crimes against the sovereign. But, he did not resist. No. But he did ask the hard questions: “My people, what have I done to you. How have I offended you? I can’t breath!” And again, “I raised you to the height of majesty; but you have knelt on my neck. I can’t breath!”

    But, George of the Floyd died for us sins: the sins of systemic racism, police brutality, and social injustice.


    Ed. Note: The author of this diatribe has been carted off to a nice hospital. He is being attended to by properly trained medical and psychiatric staff. We apologize for any harm caused.

    • Shouldn’t George of the Floyd be The Prophet? The New Mohammed? Isn’t Christ the biggest White Supremacist of All Time? I mean, talk about a white construct: Gain eternal life by living within a series of norms? Come on, man.

    • I enjoyed the Facebook meme seen recently: a young boy in a school classroom at his desk, looking at the camera with a big smile and saying, “My teacher said guns kill people, so I told her my pencil failed my math test.”

      But then, the kid is white, and,…and,…”math test?! Too much racism in that meme! Never mind…

      • Linear thinking, even! [Lucky slaps himself, and accepts the meeting invite to his agency’s “Power of Active Allyship” panel discussion (fake virtue concert).]

        • At some point we’re going to have to have a discussion about the word “Ally”, and how progressives seem to think it means “vassal”, if not “tributary”.

  3. Sullivan deserves a Captain Obvious Award for this missive.
    I would have a hard time working in a climate that is restrictive of policing. As a young patrol officer I learned proactive policing, and as a patrol supervisor, I both practiced and preached being proactive. If one of my guys or gals ever said, “Lieutenant, there’s nothing going on tonight!” I would respond, “Come with me, there is ALWAYS something going on!” I taught officers that the police car was not where police work was done, but merely a conveyance to take us to places where police work was done. Officers have to get out of their cars and use their five senses -or maybe six as they mature- to know what’s going on in the community. We loved preventing and interrupting crime much more than catching criminals after the fact. A team of good officers doing good police work. Those were the days!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.