Google is a little like the turncoat in an action movie who almost sinks the hero but then makes a surprise return at the climax to save the day. In 2006, many of us were disgusted when Google agreed to help the oppressive Chinese government censor speech and information in exchange for getting a crack at the biggest market on the planet. We heard the company’s rationalizations about compromising their principles now to help open up Chinese society, but the truth always was that “Do no evil” Google was willing to do evil for four years in exchange for a lot of yen. At last the company finally decided that it couldn’t look at itself in its virtual mirror anymore, abandoned its agreement to help China control what its people could read and say, and moved its server to Hong Kong.
Google has garnered a lot of praise on-line and elsewhere for its decision. The company did the right thing, it is true, but it would have been far more admirable if it had taken the same position four years earlier, and refused to play the part of China’s cyber-muzzle in its quest for big bucks.
That feckless guy in the action movie who comes back in the last reel isn’t really a hero, you know. The only reason he is in a position to act like one is that he did the wrong thing in the first place. We’re glad he had a change of heart, sure. But let’s not get carried away.
__________________
Update: In the category of getting “carried away,” here is a stunning example from “Op-Ed News”:
“…again Google has found itself in a situation where its ethics are being challenged by one of the most oppressive governments (In our opinion) in the Global Community, and rather than backing down, Google has chosen to stand-up for their belief that moral values and ethics trump corporate profit, an occurrence so rare these days that we believe Google deserves special recognition for refusing to compromise their core ethics of “Don’t be Evil,” even in a situation where it could result in the loss of huge profits in China’s booming economy and what may one day be one of the largest Internet markets in the world…”
The author, William Cormier, conveniently ignores the fact that Google’s decision that “moral values and ethics trump corporate profit” has only come after four years of letting profit trump its values. What does he think Google has been doing the last four years? Does he really believe China just started censoring Google searches? You can read his entire, hilarious hosanna to Google here.
Ethics Alarms 
Jack, please reread the parable of the prodigal son. Hooray for Google. They were lost and are found. And I’m not even a Christian.
Again, let’s not get carried away. They only came to this position when they realized that the most likely identity of the hackers that infiltrated their system and stole their secrets was the Chinese government. How much of this decision is their realization that they were wrong and how much is a move for a stronger bargaining position with the Chinese government?
Oh, come on. What do you have against Brad Dexter?
Bob: 1) Google’s not my son 2) The prodigal son learned the error of his ways and asked for forgiveness. 3) Google hasn’t given back any of the money it earned censoring for Big Chinese Brother; it just may have decided that the cost/benefit ration had changed.
Tom: I wasn’t thinking of Brad/Harry in “The Magnificent 7.” He doesn’t betray anyone; as Yul Brenner says, “You don’t owe anyone anything.” And he comes back at the end and promptly get shot.