Chicago Tech Academy student Tyvion Campbell, 18, performed a split as she walked across the state to get her diploma during her graduation ceremony last month the Harold Washington Cultural Center in Chicago. The exuberant display got cheers from the crowd, but the young woman, a gymnast, was refused her diploma as a result, and subsequently reprimanded by school officials.

“The principal [Zataya Shackelford] told me that ‘I need to think of a way to make up for what I’ve done. This was supposed to be a celebratory moment and I made it about myself,’” Campbell told reporters. She was escorted out of the ceremony and still hasn’t received her diploma.  “It was disappointing,” Tylon added. “It really hurt my feelings. I cried and I couldn’t even continue the graduation.” Apparently the school has no specific policy prohibiting celebratory gymnastics.

I’m amazed that any school would do this. All of the graduations I participated in were handled with restraint and decorum by the graduates (think of the ceremony in “An Officer and a Gentleman”) and any student performing even mild “Hooray for me!” gestures would have looked like a buffoon. However, students parading across the stage like they had just won an Olympic gold or a “Best in Show” ribbon has been standard graduation practice for decades now. In fact, the amount of grandstanding seen in high school ceremonies has increased in inverse proportion to how much a diploma means. The excessively proud high school grad with the screaming family in the audience probably can’t read. Tylon graduated with a 3.5 GPA and plans to study Business Administration at Georgia State University, we are told by the news media, meaning that she at least thought she had something to split about. Sadly, everybody on the stage probably had that high a grade point average or higher.

Your Ethics Alarms Ethics Quiz of the Day:

Was it fair for the school principal to punish the student for her split?

Now, other cases where students were punished for crossing metaphorical lines during their graduation ceremonies are easy calls. For example, Leen Hijaz, a senior at North Carolina’s Clayton High School, had her mic cut off during her commencement speech when she stated to rant against I.C.E. Good! She had no right to hijack the proceedings. In my fantasy world, her diploma would have been revoked and and she would be sent back to the fifth grade to learn about the rule of law and civics.

There is nothing inappropriate about Professor Jonathan Turley using his own blog to sell his recently published book. However, his recent posts are, as he would say in his restrained professorial way, “concerning.”

Turley has, along with former Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, notable in recent years for his estrangement from the political party almost all of his academic colleagues give their unconditional love. It is clear that Turley has been “red-pilled” by the gradual (and sometimes not so gradual) transformation of the Democratic Party into a “by any means possible” political descendants of the radical Weatherman of the Sixties, embracing violence, socialism, anti-American propaganda, control of the news media, and intolerance of opposing political views. Although he makes a consistent effort to try to criticize both extremes of the political spectrum (In a post condemning a politically motivated Democratic attack on acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanch, he writes, “It is fair to note that the Trump Administration has undermined its own position in denouncing lawfare by pursuing past critics, including dubious prosecutions over seashell threats against James Comey” for example), the drift of his blog to the right has been impossible to miss. 

I am certainly sympathetic. It is difficult to find anything close to the anti-democratic statements and acts by members of the Democratic Party, “the resistance” and the unethical mainstream news media on the conservative side; I face this problem every day.

A digression: listen to this clip from retired New York Times columnist Paul Krugman…

He was repeatedly flagged as an Ethics Dunce and worse here at Ethics Alarms, but maintained a prominent platform on the Times op-ed pages all through the first Trump term and most of the Biden years. Has any prominent Republican pundit ever called for the “purging” of progressives? The Democrats keep claiming that President Trump has secret plans to do so, but that is their favored partisan defamation. The Democratic Party in deed and word had embraced totalitarianism as their favored approach to the “greater good.” Turley sees it, as do I. Moreover, Krugman isn’t alone by any means: former Clinton minion James Carville is regularly heard ranting about using extreme measures to ensure permanent domination by his party. MSNow’s hard left propagandists, who, depressingly enough, are favored by the current Democrat mainstream as if they were real journalists, repeat these aspirations hour by hour, day by day.

Back to the topic: Turley now promotes his book, “The Age of Rage” in post after post. He finds ways to link his blog post topics to his baby relentlessly. In today’s post about a bonkers woke church on Nantucket cancelling its traditional Fourth of July celebration to prompt an examination of “whiteness,” he writes, “This type of pandering and posturing has become the norm today. In a time when the American flag is denounced as a divisive and “triggering” symbol, a refusal to celebrate our Independence is yet another way of proving one’s bona fides to the perpetually enraged.” Yesterday, in a post about NYC’s Communist mayor threatening to take property from landlords and transfer them to tenants, he writes, “In my book Rage and the Republic, I discuss this trend in Western countries toward socialist policies. It is what I refer to as the “economic factionalism” that has been used in prior years by figures ranging from Huey Long to Bernie Sanders.”

I am an admirer of Professor Turley’s courage in bucking the cookie-cutter leftist scholarly community, and frequently find his blog posts a source of ethics news. However, he is undermining his credibility by appearing to choose topics that support his new book’s thesis, and tailoring his prose to point to “The Age of Rage.” It is self-defeating. Turley should certainly be able to recognize his own conflict of interest. Unfortunately, bias even makes the wisest and smartest of us stupid.

I recently attended the 75th Anniversary gala of a venerable volunteer theater organization that I was very active in before starting a professional theater company in 1995. I attended with some trepidation, because I knew that I would be thrust into an unpredictable gathering of lapsed friends, former romantic interests, admirers, rivals, critics, resentful targets of my criticism, people I owed apologies to and people who should apologize to me. The event was well-organized and brought off without a hitch, despite the potential tensions that might have arisen from generational schisms; the attendees ranged from group legends in their 90s to current active members from Gen Z. To my genuine surprise, exemplary ethics were on display. almost uniformly.

To wit:

1. Despite the fact that almost everyone in attendance lives in the Greater Washington D.C. area, there were no political or partisan outbursts at all! None. Nor were there any political discussions that I was party to or encountered, though with over a hundred attendees I was obviously not privy to every stray comment. I found this amazing. These are show biz types, overwhelmingly left-leaning, Trump Deranged, and bubble-dwelling. Another large reunion event I attended last fall was rife with partisan grandstanding and political exclamations, both from podiums and in conversations. Those were all lawyers, however. If a group of volunteer theater artists can manage this, why can’t the Oscars, the Tonys, the Emmys and the Grammys? How hard is it to keep an event with a clearly delineated purpose on topic without injecting a source of conflict that will divide a group that has good reason to be welcoming and inclusive?

There is hope.

2. I wore a tuxedo, and, amazingly, I was the only one, although many of the women wore formal gowns. Okay, maybe its is old-fashioned, but to me, the way you show respect at an event like that is to dress formally.

Whew! That was close…

I would like to see a psychological profile of the establishment conservatives and Republicans who freaked out when Donald Trump stormed through the primaries to snatch the 2016 Presidential nomination away from the various candidates the hide-bound GOP high command had groomed to run. Prime among the vanquished was pathetic Jeb Bush, anointed as the next member of the Bush dynasty which had already given the nation three mediocre to disastrous Presidential terms. Jeb revealed himself as a weenie prepared to be crushed by Hillary Clinton when he described illegal immigration as “an act of love.” Imagine what the illegal immigration landscape would be like today if Jeb had run against Clinton…it’s too horrible to contemplate.

Nevertheless, Republicans who were used to a party that was afraid to be too adversarial to the rapidly radicalizing Democrats —after all, who wants to be called fascist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and racist?—turned their metaphorical backs on their principles, priorities, values and career-long political positions to try to defeat, ruin and, after his election, undermine Donald Trump. These people appear to have no scruples whatsoever. George Conway, who became a favorite of the Axis media purely because he hated Trump and had cachet through his wife, a loyal Trump adviser and surrogate, was willing to wound his spouse’s career and destroy his family as he hunted the Great White Trump.

NeverTrumpism quickly manifested as a mental illness, and its vector (well, one of them) was The Lincoln Project, and later The Bulwark, a news and commentary site that was launched by Bill Kristol and friends. In his revulsion at Trump, Kristol now says he’s a Democrat, abandoning pretty much every principle he ever advocated in his now-defunct conservative magazine, “The Weekly Standard.” His 180 degree turn is as stunning as if Stephen Jay Gould had announced that he was a creationist.

Rick Miller, one of the founders of of the Lincoln Project, demonstrates in his recent substack essay just how vile these crazies are. It’s free to read, but have a barf bag handy. The thing is called “Trump is dying.” The content is pure, unadulterated Trump Derangement at its vilest level, but I guarantee Miller’s unproven libel will be “news” on MSNow within a few hours if it isn’t already. A few lowlights: