Why is Planned Parenthood Promoting Premarital Sex?

It couldn’t be that it’s trying to drum up more abortion business, could it? Nah, that would be…unethical. Unless, of course, one likes abortions.

Watch, if you have the stomach for it, that video above, which Planned Parenthood promoted this way:

Nice! No big deal! The whole notion of virginity was a very effective moral governor to minimize unwanted and out of wedlock pregnancies, especially teen pregnancies, that would otherwise create serious societal problems. The concept that it is irresponsible—you, know, as in unethical?—to bring nascent human lives into the world before one is in a committed familial relationship is still valid, and thus, contrary to what the cheery lecturer above tells us, shame is a valid and useful social tool. Creating such unwanted lives is wrong, and courting the risk of doing so is also wrong, leading to the popularity of a greater wrong, killing that innocent life, or abortion. Planned Parenthood celebrates abortion, which is the only explanation I can come up with to explain why the organization wants to weaponize Rationalization #64, “It isn’t what it is,” as well as the always popular ideologue’s tool of confounding the English language, to erase “virginity” as a word, as a concept, and as value. Many people in the United States as well as the world still embrace the idea of being sexually abstinent until marriage, but Planned Parenthood seems to feel it is part of its mission to eradicate that—odd, since “planned parenthood” should, I would think, mean not having children until one is married.

It’s “time to throw away the notion of losing your virginity,” is the video’s message. What is virginity anyway? “All of these myths around sex and virginity can be so hurtful and overwhelming,” teens and virgins are informed in the video. “But here’s the one truth you should remember. Sex is defined by one thing and one thing only, you.” Ah yes, “your truth.” “Maybe that’s being fingered for the first time. Maybe it’s having anal sex. Maybe it’s having your first orgasm. Maybe it’s masturbating for the first time or when you enthusiastically consent to sex.”

Oh! I get it! There’s no such thing as “virginity,” because only you can decide when you lose it! Maybe it was the first time you kissed someone! Maybe it was the first time you saw a movie that made you horny! So if you’ve already lost whatever it is that virginity is, why not have promiscuous sex and constant “hook-ups”? After all, if an “accident” occurs, you can always go to Planned Parenthood for an abortion.” “That’s the beauty of your sexual journey.”

I have an idea: why can’t your “truth” be that you are still a virgin as long as you don’t care about the people they have sex with? That would mean rape victims could still be technically virgins. Brilliant!

I’m a bit surprised that PP too so long to come up with the idea of eviscerating the concept that costs them business. Bill Clinton was allowed to redefine a oral sex as not real sex as part of many his spinning defenses when he was exposed as taking lurid favors from a White House intern. This, you may recall, led to a cultural shift among U.S. teens, who could cite a President of the United States as the authority for the proposition that giving or accepting blow-jobs wasn’t really sex, or, as they put it in the Arkansas boonies when young Bill was growing up, “Eatin’ ain’t cheatin’!”

The video is especially clever because it includes some valid and important points mixed in among the pro-sex propaganda. “There is also a double standard on who carries the burden of virginity. Society puts pressure on men for not having sex at the exact same time, they shame women for having it,” for example, is a destructive double standard, but the ethical remedy for that is to insist that males accept equal responsibility for irresponsible sex in uncommitted relationships, not, as the video concludes, for women to become as irresponsible as men.

But as long as abortions are as readily available as haircuts, why not? And that’s the apparent goal of Planned Parenthood.

_____________

Pointer: Redstate.

8 thoughts on “Why is Planned Parenthood Promoting Premarital Sex?

  1. Appalling. This little film among many other reasons is why I should not be forced to support this message and organization with my tax dollars. If others want to support Planned Parenthood, they are free to donate. However, leave me out of it!

  2. As one of the comments to the Harvard Crimson trans essay (in your most recent Harvard post) reminded us:

    All that “Woke” … is just Maoism and Maoism’s war on the “four olds”:
    – old customs
    – old culture
    – old habits
    – old ideas

  3. Aside from the abhorrent immoral message I would fire the casting director, the set designer, and the costume designer. The video hurt not only my soul but my aesthetic senses as well.

  4. It’s not just Planned Parenthood. The entire Public Health establishment seems to have a very problematic relationship with the whole idea of monogamy. We know there are health benefits to stable marriages. The science behind that is many times more settled than anything they were basing policy on in the COVID-19 era. But the CDC doesn’t go around recommending marriage.

    Look at what happened with the whole Monkeypox outbreak. They tried to deny it was a sexually transmitted infection despite clear evidence to the contrary. They minimized and tried to avoid talking about how it was almost entirely confined to homosexual men. But while they talked about vaccines, and testing, about condoms, but never monogamy, never marriage. The closest they’d come was a passing mention, buried at the bottom of a press release, of “limiting your number of sexual partners”. Ten years ago, gay marriage was the Great Progressive Cause. Why is it now that the Public Health authorities feel the need to tiptoe around it like it was taboo?

    It’s not homosexuality that’s become radioactive. It’s marriage.

  5. If she is correct that sex is empowering and when defined by “you” then I have no responsibility for the consequences of that activity and should not have to shoulder the burden of caring for her offspring or his or her medical costs related to sex through my tax dollars.

    I also believe that the name Planned Parenthood is a misnomer given that people seek them out to end parenthood. Planning comes before the activity, not after. They should be renamed.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.