Oh, Just Shut Up, Professor Lichtman…

OK, I should get this out of the way up front: I’m unalterably biased against any 77 year old man who wears his hair like that, if indeed that is the professor’s real hair, which I doubt.

Then there is the fact that a vast majority of historians are Trump Deranged or have otherwise migrated into the progressive propaganda camp. Presidential historians are particularly shameful in this regard, and one of the worst is American University Professor Allan Lichtman. He was all over the TV this weekend, chasing another 15 minutes of fame as a commentator on the Democratic Party’s Joe Biden problem from an alleged historical perspective. The Big Whoop about Lichtman is that he has developed a formula that predicted the results of nine of the 10 most recent presidential elections, so that is supposed to make him an expert. It doesn’t. To begin with, his system doesn’t have “the incumbent can’t think or talk clearly any more” feature.

Continue reading

The Radio Host’s Firing: What’s (Really) Going On Here?

Over the weekend after President Biden’s less-than-reassuring interview on ABC, radio hosts Andrea Lawful-Sanders and Earl Ingram appeared on CNN. Both had held radio interviews with the President after his disastrous debate performance as part of the White House’s rehabilitation program. “Were those questions given to you by the White House, or the campaign, or did you have to submit questions ahead of this interview?” CNN host Victor Blackwell asked Lawful-Sanders.

Continue reading

Baseball Just Demonstrated That “Signature Significance” Isn’t Always Reliable

From the Ethics Alarms glossary:Signature Significance: The concept is the creation of baseball statistics genius Bill James, who applied it to baseball performance. Signature significance posits that a single act can be so remarkable that it has predictive and analytical value, and should not be dismissed as statistically insignificant. Thus, in James’ example, certain outstanding pitching performances can prove that the pitcher involved is an outstanding one, because average pitchers literally never reach such levels of excellence, even as a one-time fluke.” 

As regular readers here know, Ethics Alarms often employs the term to describe an extreme ethical or unethical act that similarly reveals the true character of the individual responsible for the conduct, and that can be reliably and fairly used to predict future conduct and trustworthiness. To cite a recent example, SCOTUS Justice Sotomayor’s hysterical dissent in Trump v. US is, all by itself, proof that she’s not qualified to be on the Court and a poor jurist. A competent judge wouldn’t write such an opinion, not even one of them. “Well, it’s just one bad dissent” doesn’t let her off the hook. The dissent is so terrible, emotion-wrought, wrong on the law and logically flawed that i a competent Justice couldn’t possibly put her name on such offal, even on the most deranged day of her life. It’s signature significance.

But as baseball giveth, baseball taketh away. Yesterday, the game presented a vivid example of how what seems like signature significance sometimes isn’t.

Jose Miranda of the Minnesota Twins, a 25-year old infielder, tied the MLB record for most consecutive hits. He got his 12th hit in a row, raising his batting average to a near league-lading .331. Amazing. No player had done that in 70 years.

Continue reading

Let’s Start a Contest: Democrat Flack “Lie of the Week” to Bolster Joe or Kamala! This Week’s Winner: Old Reliable Donna Brazile

We should perhaps begin with the fascinating question of why Donna Brazile is still paid by anyone to be an an on-air political commentator and alleged “expert.” She was fired by CNN for leaking debate questions in advance to Hillary Clinton in 2016, but now that I think about it: cheating to beat Donald Trump, or Republican candidates generally, is considered a sign of character by the news networks—Donna was just a bit over-enthusiastic that time, and besides, she got caught.

Donna bounced back, of course: now she’s a regular on ABC’s Sunday Morning “Powerhouse Roundtable.” What credentials Donna has! She’s managed or been a major player in the Presidential campaigns of Walter Mondale, Al Gore, Jesse Jackson and Dick Gephard, losers all. But the fact that she unerringly picks candidates who shouldn’t be President hasn’t marred her reputation as an “expert”; it rests on the same foundation as Karine Jean-Pierre’s reputation as a great White House Press Secretary despite being, you know, completely incompetent. Donna’s historic. Brazile was the first African American woman to direct a major presidential campaign when she helped Al Gore lose in 2000.

And she was in top form yesterday. Asked by George Stephanopolis if Historic VP Kamala Harris would automatically be the Democrats’ nominee if the party decided that it probably wasn’t a good idea to try to elect a demented President, Brazile enlightened everyone thusly,

“It would be very difficult to replace somebody who’s been vetted, who knows the job and has done a tremendous — I think she’s done a tremendous job and to ask the delegates elected to the convention, who are Biden-Harris supporters, to bypass Kamala Harris because some Republicans and a few others may not like her, it would be political malpractice. As I tell everyone, Kamala Harris has earned the right to be considered if — I mean, we got a lot of “what if” scenarios. But- she’s strong.  She’s down in Louisiana… she had a rally last night with 60,000 people.  I’ve heard from so many folks including my family- they say she’s fired up and ready to go. And they’re not going to replace her.”

Wow! Harris had a rally that 60,000 people attended! Heck, even Biden and Trump can’t attract that many supporters. And all those polls say she’s not popular: clearly, Biden was spot-on that the polls being completely wrong about everything unless they show support for Democratic policies and politicians.

Good ol’ Donna. There was no Kamala Harris “rally” in Louisiana. The 30th Essence Festival of Culture in New Orleans held a concert in the Caesar’s Superdome, and Harris appeared briefly on stage. Calling this a Harris rally is spectacular misrepresentation. I once was a speaker at an Amway meeting at the Atlanta Omni, with 10,000 greedy wackos in the audience. I guess I should put on my CV that 10,000 people came to hear Jack Marshall speak. (And they liked me! They really liked me!)

Naturally, neither George nor any other “powerhouse” at the table pointed out for their audience’s benefit that Donna had just spewed pure hooey into the air, not even counting her ridiculous assessment that Harris has been a “tremendous” Veep.

It would be nice if someone had this whopper ready to mention the next time Brazile says that Donald Trump lies all the time, but you know that won’t happen.

Yeah, I woke up cranky this morning. Sorry. I just need a cup of coffee…

Ann Althouse Jumps the Ethics Shark!

Oh-oh. This is more depressing news.

Althouse’s shtick is beginning all of her blog posts with a quote from another article, then she weighs in. Let me start this post the same way: here is part of what Ann writes regarding the news media’s rapid rush to condemn President Biden’s debate performance, what she calls ” a stampede.”

I’d really like to know who decided a stampede was the right approach and unleashed it while the President was still on the debate stage. Immediately after the debate, CNN’s John King was cued up to describe a stampede already in motion…As King described it, it’s hard to see how they even watched the debate. They seem to have gone into cabal mode to capture the post-debate narrative. Was it — to use Solnit’s phrase — “a sort of insider coup”? Who did this without knowing that they could — via stampede — drive their own candidate out of the race?…I want to know who led the “deep… wide… very aggressive panic” that “started minutes into the debate” and communicated it to John King and motivated CNN to present this as the narrative, right after the debate, preempting any normal post-debate analysis and throwing the Democratic Party into chaos. Did someone decide to risk everything to shock and awe Joe Biden into submission? Who could do that? Who would do that? And how did that old man — that supposedly broken down hopeless old man — resist? How could he resist? Who’s helping him with his hero story, which is going strangely well against the deep, wide, aggressive panickers… whoever they are?

What the hell?

It must be hard being a relentless contrarian, which is Althouse’s brand There is an obvious peril in working to say the opposite of what the conventional wisdom is, which is that occasionally the conventional wisdom is right, and a contrarian looks ridiculous. I hope that’s the explanation for that passage; if not, one of my long-time favorite bloggers has lost her frick’n mind.

What led her into this morass was an essay at The Guardian titled “Why is the pundit class so desperate to push Biden out of the race?”

It’s a dumb article by a climate change activist (among other things). Maybe Ann was having trouble finding blog topics; it’s happened to me. But come on: isn’t it clear why anyone with eyes, ears and a brain would be desperate to push Biden out of the race? He’s sliding into full dementia, that’s why; it’s been obvious for a long time, and dementia-sufferers shouldn’t be President of the United States!

The “pundit class” has another very good reason to “stampede”: trying to somehow salvage a scrap of public trust after being exposed as fully complicit in the Democrats’ Soviet-style cover-up. Is this so difficult to figure out? For Althouse? A lawyer, social critic and law professor Emeritus?

Apparently it is. Althouse’s commentary quoted above is at least as laughable—and ethically warped— as the Trump-Deranged Guardian article that inspired it:

Continue reading

Ethics Zugzwang On The Battlefield

A New York Times article relates a current controversy over Ukrainian soldiers killing Russian soldiers who have surrendered. A media in a Ukrainian unit witnessed such a killing, and was so disturbed that he reported it to the Times. “It is highly unusual for a soldier to speak publicly about battlefield conduct, particularly involving men whom he still considers friends,” the Times says. “But he said he was too troubled to keep silent.”

The Times story’s reporter, Thomas Gibbons-Neff, seems to think this is a scandal, or a scoop, or a suddenly revealed secret, or something. It isn’t, as that scene above from “The Longest Day” should indicate. That incident, like all the events portrayed in the film adaptation of the Cornelius Ryan best-seller, was taken from accounts by D-Day combatants interviewed by the author.

Continue reading

Ethics Dunce and Unethical Quote of the Month: NYT Columnist Tressie McMillan Cottom

Once again we are faced with the despicable ethics violation of an alleged authority making her readers dumber and more ignorant. And, once again, the example falls in the category of someone unqualified to read a Supreme Court opinion declaring what the holding means without understanding it.

Tressie McMillan Cottom is a 2020 MacArthur “genius” grant recipient who opines in the Times and elsewhere on culture, “higher education, work, media and inequality”(she is black, so I guess that’s mandatory). Her credentials do not justify her writing this in her latest essay:

“[T]he Supreme Court finally weighed in on presidential immunity. There is no other way to read its decision than as a signal that whoever owns the Republican Party also owns the power to break the law.”

That’s funny, because there is no possible way to read that ridiculously misrepresented decision to mean that at all. If she’s read the decision, then she’s lying or incompetent. If she hasn’t read the decision, then her ethical breach is worse. Continue reading

And Still More Post Debate Ethics: The “It Isn’t What It Is” Orgy

The meme collection inspired by a week of post-Biden meltdown spin and recriminations now available at Power Line is unusually funny: that one above, using a memorable and poignant moment from the early episodes of “The Walking Dead” (Series hero Rick says, “I’m so sorry this happened to you” before shooting the poor re-animated woman in the head), made me laugh out loud.

I suppose I don’t need to state the obvious, but let’s make it official: “The Biden Debate Disaster Ethics Train Wreck” has entered the Ethics Alarms pantheon. It still isn’t funny, as Col. Jessup would say, it’s tragic. Our President of the United States is humiliating himself before the whole world (which he doesn’t run, despite his claim to the contrary last night). We now know for certain that this party that claims to be so concerned about democracy has been engaged in a Sixties Communist-style cover-up, deceiving the public into thinking a figurehead is leading the government while unelected and unknown figures are really calling the shots. We also know that the corrupt news media has either enabled this plot or engaged in contrived ignorance to avoid revealing it. (Check out Christian Toto’s piece about how Hollywood participated in the Biden dementia cover-up.)

In a column titled You Gonna Investigate That? for the National Review, Charles Cooke makes a cogent argument regarding what the news media’s supposed shock and surprise that Biden is sliding into shadow consciousness, as many (like me) have insisted for years, logically means:

Continue reading

And Now For Something Completely Stupid: In South Carolina, An Epic Life Competence Fail

The headline says it all:

South Carolina Man Killed By Exploding Firework Mounted On His Head

Accounts say he was “showing off” to entertain his neighbors. Yeah, I know my neighbors would get a kick out of seeing me blow up my head.

Allen Ray McGrew, a 41-year-old father, died instantly when the ignited fireworks he placed on top of his Uncle Sam hat during a neighborhood Fourth of July block party went off. “He was holding this firework over his top hat,” the wife said. “I thought he was just showboating before he set it on the ground. I didn’t realize he had already lit it.” Alcohol was reportedly involved and “may have impaired his judgment,” the New York Post sagely hypothesized.

Further observations:

Continue reading

Unethical (and Pathetic) Quote of the Week: President Joe Biden

“No one said I had to.”

That was the President of the United States, not just a grown man but the democratically elected leader of our government, in response to the question posed by George Stephanopolos last night in the interview designed to calm American fears that Joe Biden is not capable of doing his job.

How diminishing, damning, desperate and depressing.

Continue reading