The U.S. District Court for D.C. Finds That Google’s Search Engine Is An Illegal Monopoly: 1) Of Course, and 2) Good!

The ruling found that Google acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in online search. Ya think? The statistics showed that Google had about 95% of the online search market, that “google” had become synonymous with “online search,” and that internal memos showed that executives acknowledged that Google’s quality of search could decline without having any negative impact on the company.

This is essentially the attitude and conditions that prevailed before the court-ordered break-up of Bell Telephone’s monopoly. “Rowan and Martin’s Laugh-In” had a running joke with Ernestine the Bell Operator (Lily Tomlin) snorting and responding to complaints with “We don’t care! We don’t have to care: we’re the phone company.” The D.C. District Court found that Google is like that.

The ruling doesn’t come soon enough to stop Google from trying to manipulate voter opinions and votes as November approaches, and the company that once had the motto “Don’t be evil” has been turned to the Dark Side for a long time. Nonetheless, this development is an important steep toward disassembling an unethical and dangerous source of power and influence in American society.

You can read the opinion here.

There is hope.

One thought on “The U.S. District Court for D.C. Finds That Google’s Search Engine Is An Illegal Monopoly: 1) Of Course, and 2) Good!

  1. Standard oil: Monopoly! Break it up!

    AT&T: Monopoly! Fracture into baby bells!

    Microsoft: Monopoly! Issue huge fines!

    Bank mortgage crisis: Too big to fail!–shovel truckloads of cash into it!

    Google: What? Yeah, everyone knows it. Now what?

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.