Promoting Your Institution By Emphasizing the Most Negative Perspective On Its History: Good Plan, U.Va!

I’m not certain what to call this, and solicit your suggestions. Incompetence? Woke virtue signaling? Self-hate? Betrayal? Insanity?

The Jefferson Council, an organization of conservative University of Virginia alumni, has criticized the recent tone of the school’s student-run campus tours that are supposed to convince prospective applicants and their families that U.Va is the place for the graduating high school students to continue their education. The tour organization, the University Guide Service, has been alienating prospective students, the Council says, by immersing the hopeful, bright-eyed young idealists with a “woke version of U.Va history.”

The cheerful tale of the storied university’s origins, the alumni complain, begins by describing how the university’s land was stolen from the Monacan Indian tribe, then goes on to describe how the Rotunda (above) designed by Thomas Jefferson as the center of campus, was constructed by slave labor. They believe that a tour for prospective students should emphasize Jefferson’s positive contributions to the nation, like, oh, authoring the mission statement for this great democratic experiment, his indispensable contribution to securing American independence, his achievements as the third President of the United States, his brilliance and an architect and inventor, those little details. There was nothing unusual about using slave labor when the University of Virginia was established in 1819. Why would an institution emphasize that in a promotional tour?

I don’t even understand why students, even progressive students, would think doing so is responsible or competent. The only explanation I can think of is that woke students, indoctrinated by the faculty with an extreme progressive agenda, want to exploit the opportunity to talk to prospective students and their families to pursue a political agenda that has nothing to do with the University of Virginia at all. It is an offshoot of Critical Race Theory with the purpose of using America’s participation in slavery as a justification for remaking the nation’s government, laws, and values.

Who in their right minds promotes anything by emphasizing its most negative aspects? “We’ve gotten hundreds of emails, calls and texts from prospective parents saying, ‘I’m so turned off that my kid is not going to Virginia,’” Tom Neale, the Jefferson Council’s president, told the New York Times. “We’re not antediluvian right-wing zealots. If we can get balanced tours, which is your first blush for many coming to U.Va., that’s all we want.”

Ah, but if you oppose the Angry Left’s march to remake America, you are an antediluvian right-wing zealot to Woke World. Try to keep up, Tom.

It doesn’t even make sense to want merely “balanced” tours. Their purpose is to use the best features on the university to make students want to come there. This is known as “promotion.” When I took my tour of Harvard, the student guides didn’t say, “Now Harvard was constructed with slave labor, the girls at Radcliffe dress like slobs, most of our famous professors are terrible teachers, the grass in Harvard Yard is always brown, and the student residences in these historic buildings in Harvard Yard make you feel like you’re living in the 19th Century.”

“And Harvard supports the immoral U.S. war machine by allowing ROTC on campus.”

Now U.Va says it is suspending the University Guide Service tours and will temporarily replace them with tours by student interns paid trained by the university while it works with the guide service to improve its approach. It also denies that the complaints from the alumni have anything to do with this decision.

Sure.

7 thoughts on “Promoting Your Institution By Emphasizing the Most Negative Perspective On Its History: Good Plan, U.Va!

  1. The unethical rationalizations in play here are:

    1 B. The Psychic Historian, or “I’m on the right side of history”

    24 A. Free Speech Confusion.

    28. The Revolutionary Excuse: “These are not ordinary times.”

    But we can give them credit: they didn’t use 52. The Underwood Maneuver!

    And instead of suspending the University Guide Service, the university needs to fire them outright.

  2. I think the guides are so marinaded in this stuff they truly believe this is what will be found to be appealing by the high school kids taking the tours. And they may be right. The high school kids may already be in full lockstep with the woke agenda. As they take the tour, they may be saying to themselves, “Man, this place is great! This is where I want to go to college. These people hate all the same stuff I hate!” And the opinions of the parents are totally irrelevant. I’m surprised the UVa administrators have taken any action on this. My bet is the little commie martinets will be back on the job in a week or two.

  3. For my entire life, the Democratic Party’s opinion of the US and Western Society has been ‘it is patriotic to point out what is wrong with your country’. This may be true, but that is only if you also point out what is RIGHT with your country. They have never done that. The Democratic Party and the left in general, have only poured out hatred on this country, Western Civilization, Christianity, traditional morals, etc. They are incapable of saying anything nice about this country.

    Now, what are some good things to point on a U. Va. promotional tour?

    (1) Jefferson was inspired or urged to found the university by Joseph Priestley, the discoverer of oxygen, the inventor of carbonated water and the pencil eraser.

    (2) There were no degrees initially. Jefferson wanted a new type of university. Initially, you were supposed to come, take classes, and leave when ‘you felt educated’.

    (3) The dorm apartments on the main lawn were designed by Jefferson. To this day, the students heat them with firewood.

    (4) Founding U.Va. is one of the accomplishments on Jefferson’s tombstone. The others are writing the Declaration of Independence and writing the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom. President didn’t make the list.

  4. If they be serious about thier self loathing they should annotate all their diplomas. It should clearly state that the bearer of this diploma freely chose to attend and complete thier course of study at a racist instituion. If they want to sound errudite here is the latin tranlation they could inscribe, “Lator diplomatum huius ad racist institutionem profectus est

  5. Who are they alienating? If it’s more conservative students who are repelled by this tour, then I would say, mission accomplished. They want students who all think alike.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.