Our Anti-Democratic Indoctrination Camps Get Slapped Down Again

Americans don’t appreciate the critical work on their behalf being done by groups like Turning Point USA, FIRE, and Prof. Jacobson’s Equal Protection Project, all of which would be termed “threats to democracy” under Joe Biden’s rhetoric.

This time it was Turning Point that stepped up. Riley Gaines, the gutsy and articulate former college swimmer who has become the de facto leader of opposition to allowing biological males compete as women against female athletes, was scheduled to speak at the University of New Mexico. The event was sponsored by Turning Point’s student organization on campus. The University told the students that they would have to employ extra security staff because Gaines would naturally be a catalyst for potential violence since the current mutation of student progressives like violence. (That wasn’t exactly what they said, but I’m acting like a journalist this morning.) TP-UNM told the University that it expected around 100 attendees and that the Gaines event would would last around three hours. It then received an email including an invoice that charged the students $10,202.50 to let a conservative speaker give her views on campus (well, again, that wasn’t exactly what the email said. It’s just what the email meant.) The charge covered the use of 33 security officers, or one for every three anticipated attendees, in the discretion of the university.

If your First Amendment alarm doesn’t sound after reading that, it might not have been installed correctly.

After the event, which went on without incident and minimal protesting, the final invoice that UNV delivered was about half the original amount. I’m guessing a UNV lawyer told UNV, “Mmmmm, I think $10,000 is too obviously a ‘Shut up, you bigoted conservatives!’ message. You might get away with $5,000.”

It didn’t. Turning Point sued, and yesterday, in Leadership Institute v. Stokes, a court struck down the UNV policy and its inflated, speech-constricting invoice. “Plaintiffs have shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their overbreadth claim because the security fee policy does not contain limiting language that includes “narrowly drawn, reasonable and definite standards[,]” and it does not include anything to prevent UNM administrators from exercising their discretion in a content-based manner….,” the court ruled.

Good.

_______________

Pointer: The Volokh Conspiracy

2 thoughts on “Our Anti-Democratic Indoctrination Camps Get Slapped Down Again

  1. Bill Jacobson. Hamilton College’s most important graduate, certainly in terms of his efforts to save the American academy. (So surprising he’s able to move freely at Cornell.) I reached out to him to see if he would speak at our reunion and even agree to be considered to become president. He demurred, saying, “The college is too far gone.”

  2. I posted this article along with “What a Surprise. A Court Seems To Think A Democratic Prosecution Of Donald Trump Might Be A Teeny Bit Biased!” to my Facebook page. Facebook Nazis have now flagged and restricted my account for posting what they term “spam.”

    It’s not the first time I have run into Facebook Nazis, but their aggressive and open censorship with all we are dealing with this election cycle is seriously annoying.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.