Oh NO!. We Have Entered Some Hellscape Where Chris Cuomo’s Analysis Makes Sense…

There are few journalists I have less respect for than Chris Cuomo, who I would have long ago labeled an Ethics Villain except that he isn’t deft enough to reach that rung on the unethical miscreant ladder. Chris is just an extreme Ethics Dunce, and has proven it repeatedly; hence his nickname “Fredo.” Yet somehow, Cuomo has correctly grasped what so many of the Trump-Deranged cannot, a factor that is core to understanding the election. On his podcast, “The Chris Cuomo Project,” Cuomo said,

“You have some low-level culture war fruit, but I don’t really think that matters. You have pain in the pocketbook. And yes, there is a story to be told that we’re doing better in terms of most other places, major economies recovering or not recovering from the pandemic. But do you really care if, at the end of the day, things cost more? Probably not….which is why they’re pushing the “Trump is a despot” thing because they’re trying to make something more important than your pocketbook. And I don’t know that that works, and I don’t know that they should even be playing at it, frankly, because I don’t think they beat Trump in a battle to the bottom of grievance. I do not think they win that. The ‘he’s a despot’ versus ‘you’re a commie,’ I think she loses. And not because I think she’s a commie—I think that’s absurd, I also think the idea that he’s a despot is absurd. You gotta stop thinking that the people who support Trump are like Trump, that they speak like Trump, that they act like Trump. They don’t. They want to hire Trump to do a dirty job. They want him to be a virus to the political corpus. They want him to disrupt, to destroy, to demean those that they disrespect and dislike, the system that they distrust and despise. They want someone to do what they believe has been done to them and that they cannot do themselves. That’s why they don’t care that he exhibits terrible behavior because they’re putting him into a terrible place. If you’re sending somebody into the jungle, do you really care if they’re a savage? You see what I’m saying?

You may not agree. You may not accept. You may not like, but that’s what it is.

Continue reading

“Nah, There’s No Mainstream Media Bias!” Here’s What the New York Times Has For Readers This Morning [Updated]:

Main article: “Trump at the Garden: A Closing Carnival of Grievances, Misogyny and Racism. The inflammatory rally was a capstone for an increasingly aggrieved campaign for Donald Trump, whose rhetoric has grown darker and more menacing.

#2: “Inside the Movement Behind Trump’s Election Lies”

#3: “Far-Right Figures Escalate Talk of Retribution and Election Subversion

A ways down the page we see, “A Trump Rally Speaker Trashed Puerto Ricans. Harris Reached Out to Them.” Added: I didn’t read the piece, but the headline was misleading and deliberately so. The “speaker” was a comedian, and he was doing a routines. Ah. So the idea is that his jokes were meant seriously, and because it was a Trump rally, Trump endorsing the jokes as if they were serious positions.

Now for the columns:

Continue reading

On President Biden’s Unethical Apology

Barack Obama was the all-time champion of cynical, politically motivated Presidential “apologies.” It’s election time, though: the Democrats are in trouble, and clearly some bright propagandist assisting those faceless apparatchiks pulling poor Joe’s strings suggested that what the hell, it couldn’t hurt to have Biden grovelling to Native Americans right now.

It was a loud and angry grovel: Joe was shouting into the mic for some reason, telling the Gila River Indian Community in Arizona in part,

“The federal government has never, never formally apologized for what happened, until today. I formally apologize as president of the United States of America for what we did. I formally apologize. I have a solemn responsibility to be the first president to formally apologize to the Native people. It’s long, long, long overdue. Quite frankly, there’s no excuse this apology took 50 years to make….One of the most horrific chapters of the American history. We should be ashamed. The vast majority of Americans don’t know about it.” 

Bite me. Biden probably didn’t know about it until he was told that he was making the speech. This was his first diplomatic visit to a tribal nation in his four-year term. Gee, what a coinkydink that it came right before an election! He should be ashamed to engage in such obvious pandering, but the shame threshold of his party is at an all-time high right now. Have you noticed?

Let’s look at everything wrong with this “apology”:

Continue reading

Time for Another Axis Election Desperation and “Win By Any Means Necessary” Update!

The Axis of Unethical Conduct—“the resistance,” Democrats and the mainstream media—have sensed the movement toward Donald Trump and away from Kamala Harris, and not counting its members who are in pure denial, it is, to use the technical term, “freaking out.” The next week should be something: it’s “throw it on the wall and see if it sticks, we can’t be any worse off” time.

For example,

  • Harris pretty clearly made up the story of her McDonald’s service, so Trump expertly trolled her by arranging to serve a stint as McDonald’s employee. Freakout. Axis hysterics screamed that it was staged. (Of course it was.) Outlets tracked down workers to criticize Trump’s frying techniques. Then, this weekend, we got this desperate effort:

No shame or decency at all. Continue reading

When Ideology-Driven Fads Harm the Innocent…

On Twitter/”X,” the advocacy organization “Restore Childhood” documents the horrific case study of a little boy pushed into “gender affirming care” by his woke-lunatic mother, facilitated by unethical medical professionals. Below is the tweet series. You can watch the disturbing videos here.

Continue reading

Ethics Dunce: Howard Kurtz

It’s impossible to keep up with our hopeless news media’s dishonesty and incompetence.

My five minutes of watching Fox News today (I have added PBS to Fox News, MSNBC and CNN as my “five minutes a day” sampling chores) yielded this inexcusable botch by Fox News “media watchdog” Howard Kurtz:

Exiting a discussion of the McDonald’s flap, Kurtz quickly said, “A freind of Harris came forward and said that she worked with Harris at McDonalds, but moving on….”

That’s completely false. That “friend” (she’ works’s employed bythe Harris campaign) did not work with Harris at McDonald’s and only said that Harris’s mother, who has been dead for 15 years, told her that Harris worked at McDonald’s. That’s double hearsay even if it’s true. X says that Y said that Z did something she didn’t actually see her do. Such testimony proves nothing, but Kurtz, because he’s sloppy or lazy or has a bad staff, misinformed his audience that the woman worked with Harris at the still unidentified McDonalds.

Worse, he’s supposed to report on news media ethics, and then, as a national TV reporter, gives out wrong information.

Fox News should trade Kurtz back to CNN for Jake Tapper and a box of Crackerjacks.

Note: The WordPress bot says I should tag this post “Heart of Darkness.”

End of an Ugly Week Ethics Warm-Up, 10/27/24: “Boo!”

Commenter Chris Marschner’s observation that Kamala Harris is “no Jackie Robinson….She is tying an anchor around the candidacy of future black women candidates. Her campaign will be remembered” reminded me of an old Ethics Alarms post about Barack Obama. The fact that he (and Michelle, that feminist who has based her prominence, wealth and influence on her husband’s career and popularity: “Hear her roar!”) is viewed as having any positive influence over voters at all testifies to the fact that Obama played President as well as any POTUS we have had since George Washington. Oh, there have been many others as good at it: Lincoln, Harding, FDR, Ike, JFK and Reagan among the masters. This is the aspect of the job that Donald Trump is epically terrible at, and a main reason he isn’t leading in the polls by double digits. Obama, was the opposite: an inept and destructive President who survived his two terms, an election he should have lost, and, in all likelihood, the assessment of historians by looking and acting like a leader. From that post…

“The tragic legacy of Barack Obama will be recorded in three parts: his groundbreaking achievement as the nation’s first black President, his utter incompetence at governing and leadership, and his dishonesty and the dishonesty he engendered by those who reported to him. The first has been fatally undermined by the second and third, and the third, dishonesty, necessitated by the second, the relentless incompetence. The reason this is so tragic should be obvious to all. President Obama, like all trailblazers, needed to be a stand-out, exemplary performer to avoid setting back the causes his ascension needed to advance. But instead of Jackie Robinson, he has been Pumpsie Green, and that may be unfair to Pumpsie, the first black player to wear a Boston Red Sox uniform who knew his limitations, and did the best he could for as long as he could. It is also tragic because America, as much as any time in its history prior to the Civil War, needed a strong, wise, confident, unifying leader to deal with great and difficult problems that will only get worse with time. The challenges would have tested the best of leaders; for President Obama, with neither leadership instincts or talent, they have proven impossible. Worse, the basic requirements of governing have been proven to be beyond him, and he does not have the self-awareness or humility to seek the help he needs.

Key word: “unifying.”

One other note before we get into the weeds: I am always searching for signals regarding cultural emanations, and I am puzzled by the spectacular drop in Halloween decorations in my Alexandria, Virginia neighborhood compared to last year or any year within memory. This area usually goes nuts over Halloween. What’s going on here? Is it the election? Do people regard all of the “Harris-Walz” signs scary enough? Theories welcome….

Continue reading

Unethical (But Unsurprising) Quote of the Month: Michelle Obama

“It’s clear to me that the question isn’t whether Kamala is ready for this moment because by every measure, she has demonstrated that she’s ready.The real question is: as a country, are we ready for this moment?”

—-Former First Lady Michelle Obamasuggesting that not electing Kamala Harris President will prove that America is “not ready” to have female president of color.

And there it is. The missing piece, and again, the standard accusation every time a black or female Democrat is judged by accomplishments, character and ability and found wanting: the critics are bigots. The race card, the gender card, and the fact that we have to put up with this insult and default accusation repeatedly is, all by itself, a good reason to have second thoughts about electing Democratic female and/or “of color” candidates. We had to put up with this when Barack Obama, a weak and divisive President, was called tor account, and when Hillary Clinton, corrupt and repellent, wasn’t able to win the 2016 election against a vilified real estate mogul with no previous experience in elected office.

Continue reading

Well Yes, This Phenomenon Was Inevitable and I’ve Been Predicting It For Decades…

In a New York Times op-ed (that’s a gift link, getting you past the pay-wall: You’re welcome!), a writing professor from Southern Methodist University reveals his epiphany regarding why today’s college students generally don’t read books. He writes in part,

Nationwide, college professors report steep declines in students’ willingness and ability to read on their own. To adapt, instructors are assigning less reading and giving students time in class to complete it.

It’s tempting to lament the death of a reliable pathway to learning and even pleasure. But I’m beginning to think students who don’t read are responding rationally to the vision of professional life our society sells them. In that vision, productivity does not depend on labor, and a paycheck has little to do with talent or effort. For decades, students have been told that college is about career readiness and little else. And the task of puzzling out an author’s argument will not prepare students to thrive in an economy that seems to run on vibes…

Once students graduate, the jobs they most ardently desire are in what they proudly call the “sellout” fields of finance, consulting and tech. To outsiders, these industries are abstract and opaque, trading on bluster and jargon. One thing is certain, though: That’s where the money is….All in all, it looks as if success follows not from knowledge and skill but from luck, hype and access to the right companies. If this is the economy students believe they’re entering, then why should they make the effort to read? For that matter, how will any effort in school prepare them for careers in which, apparently, effort is not rewarded?

Duh. You just figured this out, did you?

Continue reading

Comment of the Day: “Is This the Level of Critical Thinking Devoted To Pro-Abortion Advocacy?”

That post was partially triggered by the bombardment of intellectually dishonest or outright false pro-abortion campaign ads I’ve had to endure lately from Maryland and Virginia Democratic candidates. (Did you know that the Republicans will enact a national abortion ban?) In one, a GOP candidate is mocked for saying that the Dobbs decision overturning Roe was legally correct. “Huh?” says a woman or actress whom I guarantee didn’t read the opinion (or Roe) and who couldn’t explain the legal arguments if a gun was pointed at her head. Almost all legal scholars and lawyer admit that Roe v. Wade was incompetent; their major argument for not reversing it is “It’s too late: stare decisus!” Let’s ask that “Huh” lady to define stare decisus.

As he/she/it often does, one of Extradimensional Cephalopod‘s posts, this time an argument for abortion, prompted a sterling response. Here is Ryan Harkins’ Comment of the Day on the post, “Is This the Level of Critical Thinking Devoted To Pro-Abortion Advocacy?”.….

***

The topic of “nature” is an important one to discuss, because ethics follows nature. Classically, we can ask what something is, and what about that thing makes it what it is. The whole notion of taxonomy relies on defining “what” something is. When we examine things, we notice two main categories of details. One category is essentials, and the other category is accidentals. It is essential to the nature of water to be composed of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom, and it is essential to the nature of water to be a solid at some temperature, a liquid at another temperature, and a gas at a third temperature. It is accidental to water to be wet, because ice and super-heated steam are not wet, and it is an accident of water to be white, because snow is white but steam is transparent. Another way to put that is water can lose wetness and still be water, but if water loses its hydrogen atoms, it is no longer water.

There is such a thing as human nature. We can discuss and reason and argue about what details of human existence are essential and which are accidental, but I think we can agree that at some point if enough details are removed, what remains is no longer human. If we take the evolution of species (which Catholics are allowed to believe in), while we notice a gradation of speciation, we nevertheless notice that distinct species have disparate traits that are essential to being that species. Certainly it seems that a very distinct and essential detail of being human is being a rational creature. What Sarah B. brought up about rational kinds notices that a rational nature, while necessary, is not sufficient to identify as human, as there could be rational alien races in the universe, and the Catholic belief in purely spiritual beings that we call angels and demons postulates rational natures that are not human. In a similar way, there are shared details among primates, but there are different details about humans that distinguish them from other primates.

Continue reading