Monday Morning Trump Presidency First Week Ethics Update

1. A norm is born! In November, I wrote again about Harvard’s unethical and dishonest propagandists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt after earlier pronouncing them Academic Ethics Villains. “These two favorites of the New York Times are substantially responsible for the Axis of Unethical Conduct‘s Big Lie #6: “Trump’s Defiance Of Norms Is A Threat To Democracy,” a cornerstone of the Harris Campaign’s desperate “Trump is Hitler” strategy. They had just issued another one of their fear-mongering and academically indefensible Times op-eds, banging that same metaphorical drum with their (profitable!) argument that any genuine student of Presidential history (like they claim to be) knows is 100% hooey, and using the beat to argue for Democrats taking unprecedented measures to block Trump from the presidency….all of which defy previous democratic norms! The Levitsky and  Ziblatt hypocrisy has nonetheless become, apparently, a standard weapon for the Axis to use against Trump, as increasingly absurd as it.”

Trump, like all functioning Presidents who understand the office, creates new “norms.” (Fortunately, the Joe Biden innovation of the President being a hollow shell maneuvered by hidden hands does not look like it will become a norm.) During Trump’s first term, he created a norm by using social media to make the case for his own leadership while competing with the Axis news media’s efforts to debase him. Such direct contact with the public hearkened back to the days of FDR’s “fireside chats” on the radio. Trump is no Roosevelt, and his often hasty tweets in ALL CAPS often did more damage than good. Still, the use of social media as an unfiltered means of reaching the public without the spin of media partisans is destined to become standard operating procedure, at least for President bold enough to do it, and not delegate their social media accounst to 20-something nerds. Now, thanks to artificial intelligence bots. Trump, or any President, can create his (or her) own political cartoons via the meme-maker function, and get more circulation via social media than most news sources can give to outdated hacks like the self-righteous ex-WaPo cartoonist discussed here.

The viral “Trump as bad-ass gangster” meme above, following nicely on the “Melania as gangster” talk around her flashy Inauguration fashion statement, also guarantees that “FAFO” will enter the lexicon beyond its Gen X origins. FAFO is short for “Fuck around and find out,” or, in Tony Barretta’s words, “Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time”…. or, in my father’s generation’s words, “Actions have consequences.”

2. The Colombia showdown yesterday, when the president of Colombia initially refused to accept the illegal immigrants from his country that Trump’s crackdown was sending back, looks as if it will be Trump’s equivalent of Ronald Reagan’s resolution of the illegal air traffic controllers’ strike early in his administration. Trump responded by slapping a 25% tariff on the South American nation for its defiance, and Colombia’s president quickly capitulated, agreeing to take back his citizens after all. In some respects this was even better than Reagan’s slap-down of the air traffic controllers union: a lot of American support unions, but almost nobody likes Colombia.

3. As so often happens, Trump’s tactics triggered some of his favorite foes into making fools of themselves. AOC quickly whined via social media about how Trump’s Colombia products tariffs would raise the price of coffee and ruin Valentines Day by causing flower bouquet inflation, or something. It has been said before, but Donald Trump has been blessed with some of the most inept and ridiculous political foes of any major U.S. political figure, ever. In a similar vein House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies told a gathering that DEI is “an American value” last week. That one’s head-spinning. The Left’s position has been that racial and gender discrimination was embedded in the evil U.S. culture and must be exorcised by any means possible. Now its position is that racial and gender discrimination are admirable values, as long as they are doing the discriminating.

4. The stark contrast between Trump’s furious and unprecedented series of Executive Orders and policy changes with the slow-motion rot of the last months of the Biden Administration is guaranteed to increase support for both Trump and the Republican Party. CNN’s Harry Enten was freaking out about that this morning, saying that the swing to public approval of Trump is extraordinary. As right-wing wag Stephen Kruiser says on his daily newsletter today, “It’s more obvious every day that Americans from all over the political spectrum have been longing for meaningful change, which President Trump is giving them.” 

5. One conclusion that has to me made from the last week: Trump does not have a flat learning curve, at least in organization management and the Presidency. In 2016, he was both unprepared for the dynamics of his new job and not ready for the degree of (undemocratic) obstruction that was heaped on him before his Presidency could even get underway. The 2016 Post Election Ethics Train Wreck began with Trump receiving the equivalent of Butch Cassidy’s kick to the crotch in this memorable scene from “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid”…

….that “kick” being the unprecedented efforts to frame his election as illegitimate, with the Russian Collusion accusations and investigations beginning almost immediately. This time, Trump did the kicking. “Fool me once…”

6. Regarding some of Trump’s more controversial moves:

—-I have no problem with his revoking the security credentials of the 51 intelligence officers who signed a public letter announcing that Hunter Biden’s laptop bore “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation,” and the security details of former National Security Advisor and certifiable whack-job John Bolton as well as Ethics Villain Anthony Fauci. Call it retribution if you want: the moves are still responsible and well-earned. None of these individuals is trustworthy.

—-Trump fired 17 inspectors general in the Defense Department, State Department, Energy Department, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Veterans Affairs, and elsewhere. One of the fired IG’s lamented, “It’s a widespread massacre. Whoever Trump puts in now will be viewed as loyalists, and that undermines the entire system.”

This is more learning curve stuff. In his first term, Trump found that he couldn’t trust any hold-over government employees not to be actively involved in the Left’s efforts at undermining him. Maybe all of the ex-IGs weren’t snakes in the grass, but some of them were. Starting from scratch is prudent and simply competent management.

7. The effort to end birthright citizenship is still probably futile, but there was much to be learned from this exchange J.D Vance had on CBS’s “Face the Nation”:

HOST MARGARET BRENNAN: “A federal judge, appointed by Ronald Reagan, who I think you’d agree, has some conservative credentials… paused the order to end birthright citizenship, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.” How do you reconcile this challenge to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution?”

VANCE: “So, I obviously disagree with that judge and these things — some of them will be litigated. That’s the nature of our constitutional system. But here’s the basic idea of President Trump’s view on this. If you are a lawful permanent resident or a legal immigrant who plans to stay, your children, of course, should become American citizens. But let’s say you’re the child of an ambassador, you don’t become…”

BRENNAN: “…but that’s not part of it.”

VANCE: “Well, that’s an important principle…”

BRENNAN: “There’s already a carveout having to do with kids of diplomats.”

VANCE: “But we’re saying that that carve out should apply to anybody who doesn’t plan to stay here. If you come here on vacation and you have a baby in an American hospital, that baby doesn’t become an American citizen. If you’re an illegal alien and you come here temporarily, hopefully, your child does not become an American citizen by virtue of just having been born on American soil. It’s a very basic principle in American immigration law, that if you want to become an American citizen, and you’ve done it the right way, and the American people in their collective wisdom have welcomed you into our national community, then you become a citizen. But temporary residents, people who come in here, whether legally or illegally, and don’t plan to stay, their children shouldn’t become American citizens. I don’t know any country that does that, or why we would be different.”

BRENNAN: “Well, this is a country founded by immigrants.”

VANCE: “Well, this is a country founded by…”

BRENNAN: “This is a unique country….”

VANCE: “This is a very unique country, and it was founded by some immigrants and some settlers. But just because we were founded by immigrants, doesn’t mean that 240 years later that we have to have the dumbest immigration policy in the world. No country says that temporary visitors- their children will be given complete access to the benefits and blessings of American citizenship. America should actually look out for the interests of our citizens first, and that means, again, if you’re here permanently and lawfully, your kid becomes an American citizen. If you’re not here permanently, if you’re not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States…”

BRENNAN: “Yeah…”

VANCE: “…and don’t plan to be, why would we make those people’s children American citizens permanently?” 

Takeaways:

  • When will the news media figure out that acting as partisan adversaries every time they interview a Republican or a conservative is wrecking what little credibility and influence they have left? Bias makes you stupid, I guess…
  • Vance is no Kamala Harris: he can speak clearly and pointedly. Indeed, he speaks much more clearly than President Trump. A competent Vice-President! When was the last one? Al Gore?
  • Brennan falling back on the “America is a nation of immigrants” as a rationalization for leniency toward illegal immigrants is just one step above arguing that the poem on the Statue of Liberty commits the U.S. to open borders.
  • Hilarious! An Axis journalist arguing that the United States is unique! It is, of course, but her cabal reflexively rejects claims of America exceptionalism, and is constantly arguing that U.S. policy should follow the rest of the world in immigration, in gun control, in universal health care, in “hate speech” censorship, in capital punishment.

8. Finally, Trump has done more interviews and taken more questions from reporters in one week than Joe Biden did in the six months before the election. When will journalists give him appropriate credit for that?

19 thoughts on “Monday Morning Trump Presidency First Week Ethics Update

  1. As far as the inspector generals go, they had it coming. When Vindman leaked Trump’s Ukraine call to a friend who tried to file a complaint, the IG found that you couldn’t. The policy wouldn’t allow it (possibly something about the complaint being based on evesdropping on the President’s call to a foreign leader and the complainant was in possession of classified material illegally ). So the IG changed the policy. To keep people from realizing he changed the policy to allow this complaint, he FALSIFIED THE DATE OF THE CHANGE. I believe falsifying documents to cover up a crime is actually the felon(ies) Trump was ‘convicted’ of in NY. The fact that classified document mishandling and felony falsification of government documents was allowed as the basis for Trump’s first impeachment is reason enough to can all the IG’s. Shouldn’t one of the IG’s have stepped forward and said “You can’t do that”. None of them did, however, indicating the entire institution is rotten.

  2. 7. I loved this exchange. Not only because America is exceptional only when the Left needs to make a point that advances its own argument, but also because it displays one of the SOP arguments regarding judicial decisions: that the person (and the corresponding political bent) who appointed the judge is relevant.

    Brennan starts off by emphasizing that the judge was a Reagan appointee which means that Trump is absolutely positively violating democratic norms if even someone Reagan appointed thinks it’s unconstitutional. Of course, had the judge given the okay, Brennan would have doubtlessly argued, “Well, of course, he was a Reagan appointee!”

    We do certainly have partisan judicial appointees who will rule along party lines. I will never argue that, but one of the most insidious and prevalent arguments that undermine American democracy and, in particular, the Judicial branch is that the merit of decisions that come down from the bench should be measured by the partisan beliefs of the appointing executive.

  3. One tangential comment about the Vance/Brennan exchange:

    A while back there was some bleating by the Left that President Trump surrounded himself with idiots. I believe the actual language was “dumb women”, but in a broader sense, the implication was that Trump always had to look better than his groupies.

    I would contend that the evidence suggests otherwise. JD Vance is a better extemporaneous speaker than Trump, he thinks more quickly on his feet, and is more focused in responding to questions. JD Vance seems more knowledgeable, whereas Trump is a little more emotional…more soundbite-ish.

    After watching Pam Bondi take on (and take down) questioners in her Senate hearings, only the most partisan hack would call her a “dumb woman”. The most controversial so far – Pete Hegseth – certainly proved his verbal mettle in his hearings. Both Tulsi Gabbard and RFK, Jr are more eloquent and thoughtful speakers than Trump.

    Anyways, we might not like some of the people around President Trump. but the notion that they’re dumb is, so far, a ridiculous assertion.

    • I watched the entirety of the Joe Rogan interview with Trump. I had two takeaways of note from the interview.

      First was that any of the attempts to portray Trump as mentally declined were crap. Trump didn’t do well in the debate with Biden, and I think there was some who would be inclined to believe the assertions. But the 3 hour interview, all taken in one go, disproved that. Trump was very engaged with Rogan. I think Rogan’s approach was good in this regard, he didn’t put Trump on the defensive and it was a great conversation.

      The second was the exchange that started with Rogan asking a question:

      This is what I wanted to ask you, what was it like, when you actually got in, because nobody really can prepare you for that, when you’re running for president, you don’t really know what it’s going to be like when you actually get into office, what was the, what did you think it was going to be like?

      That started a back and forth that had Trump talking about how he didn’t know he was going to win and wasn’t prepared to be president. About how he picked the wrong people, so he had to depend on traditional republicans for recommendations and they were often loyalists. Trump said he wasn’t making that mistake again.

      I think we’re going to see a level of competency this time around that Trump’s opponents are not prepared for. You’re noting many of those this time that are not going to sabotage Trump from the inside.

  4. My recommendation to Vance and Trump when having to reply to the claim we are a nation of immigrants they should say we are a nation in large measure built on the importation of cheap or indentured labor for the benefit of the few. Is that the immigration policy for which you are advocating? That is the one I am using from here on out.

    • The whole ‘if you get a pension, thank an illegal immigrant’ narrative enrages me. My jaw dropped the first time I read one of those articles explaining that ‘undocumented’ immigrants put billions into the SS coffers that they can’t collect later, that they’re keeping the SS system afloat.

      Fruit and vegetables prices are artificially low due to cheap, piece-rate labor done by people with no safety nets and rights whatsoever should something go wrong (illness, injury) . Some producers are providing housing, kitchens, and other amenities for work-permit bearing individuals who come in seasonally (the apple industry has been lauded lately for the steps they’re taking), but so many are in the US on precarious ground. And Democrats tell us this is just fine and dandy! We’ll all get pensions because of it.

      • One of the downsides of cheap labor is that it leads to the lack of innovation in the agricultural equipment industry. When we substitute cheap labor for capital equipment we typically maintain a higher long run cost curve for agricultural commodities.
        The less cheap labor made available will require investments in capital goods which tend to increase efficiency and lower costs.

        • It is also one reason we’re starting to see more and more automation in industries like fast food restaurants.

          If restaurant owners have to drastically increase their labor costs they have a couple options: Drastically increase prices, go out of business, or reduce labor costs via automation.

          We see all three results, but the big chains are opting for automation rather than going out of business. Which, of course, means fewer jobs available per restaurant.

          So American teens trying to get a starter job at McDonald’s? Sorry, only skilled labor needed now……

  5. It’s_Really_Good_To_See: Former Biden Ice Director Praises Trump’s Illegal Immigration Crackdown

    THAT’S gonna leave a mark!

    It gets better.

    It aired on MSNBC! Both it and CNN have lost half their viewership (plummeting to 30 year lows!) since the election; to hard-hitting Cartoon Channel programming and Sponge Bob Square Pants reruns…?

    PWS

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.