Funny, I was just thinking about how there hadn’t been a genuine Naked Teacher Principle story in a long time, and POOF!—one magically appears. The last genuine variation of the NTP, as we call it around here for short, was in late December 2023, featuring the Porn Actor University Chancellor. Last year, there was one storie nixed by the NTP qualifications committee of one, the rap-singing teacher, and one really weird story that deserves its own category, The Drag Queen School Principal Principle.
Today’s NTP story, however, is the Real McCoy, as you can probably guess from that photo above of Victoria Triece, 33. Victoria sued Orange County Public Schools for $1 million in 2023 because Sand Lake Elementary would not let her volunteer to assist with her son’s class activities after discovering she had a web presence that was, they thought, inappropriate. Ms. Triece is an Only Fans star, an adult entertainer, and a former cover girl for Playboy and FHM magazine.
In the lawsuit she claimed to be “humiliated'” by the rejection, arguing that her personal life was off limits to be judged by the school administrators. They violated her rights of free speech, free assembly and her right of privacy, she averred, and also subjected her to ‘”sexual cyberharassment” for sharing photos from her OnlyFans site among staff and with media outlets.
See, this is the essence of the Naked Teacher Principle. It isn’t that someone who has exposed (or nearly) their bodacious bod on the web has to be judged unfit or even should be judged unfit to teach impressionable young minds once the photos become public. The NTP just holds that they have no one to blame but themselves if that’s the decision.
Orange County Circuit Judge Brian S. Sandor ultimately ruled that Victoria had no “substantive due process right” to volunteer at the school, so her lawsuit had no valid claims. The judge also wrote that Triece does not have the right to argue with school about being removed, since the volunteer program “does not include any language that confers any right or benefit upon an individual to participate in the program, to remain in the program, or to appeal a removal decision.”
__________________
Pointer: Old Bill
Ethics Alarms 
I, and I may not be alone on this, am eternally grateful to have OB standing a post to…um…secure scoops like this….
PWS
I was kind of sheepishly thinking along the same lines, Paulie. Is this a good, er, specialty?
Heck yeah, OB! It keeps us abreast…er…supplies a greater understanding of our ever-evolving culture to the EA commentariat; better we learn it here than on a street corner, am I right…?
PWS
All the tattoos are an instant turn-off to me. A close second are the fingernails, which look capable (in a moment of distraction) of rendering me lifeless in a pool of throat-slit blood.
I guess I’m not hot for teacher.
Tattoos…..?
PWS
Then, there is this:
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/metro-nashville-police-arrest-onlyfans-cop-sean-herman
Apparently, the Nashville Police Department was not too happy that one of their officers engaged in an OnlyFans skit showing him groping a buxom lass who wanted to get out of a speeding ticket. The police officer appeared in the skit in what looked like full Nashville PD uniform. The officer was on a “this is last chance or you’re out program” as a result of prior misconduct.
Oops. For the life of me, I can’t understand why the Nashville PD would be upset.
jvb
Oh John, the video is much sketchier(?) than imaginable. Hah!
Per the link:
How this story came to be
The video — titled “Can’t believe he didn’t arrest me” — was originally posted by a woman named Jordin who was sitting in the driver’s seat. A man in the passenger seat is heard telling Jordin that he knew she would be pulled over for how fast she was driving.
The man pans the camera from the back windshield where a white squad car is seen. Jordin is then heard saying, “I’m not going to get a ticket…I’m going to show him my t**s.”
Moments later, an officer approaches the driver’s side door and identifies himself as “Officer Johnson of PD.”
He is then seen reaching into the car and groping Jordin’s breast before grabbing his genitals through his pants.
Per the Daily Mail:
“Speaking to Daily Mail in 2023, [her attorney Mark] NeJame said the school board was behaving like the ‘morality police’ and compared it to a parent who hunts endangered species or cheats on their partner.
He explained: ‘If a teacher or a parent was having an adulterous relationship, many would consider that to be far less moral.
‘Does that mean that parents and teachers who have violated their marriage vows shouldn’t be around children, is that immoral?'”
Uh, Mark, unlike your client’s activities, most adulterous relationships are almost by definition clandestine.
So much for Victoria’s secret.
Hey, low-hanging fruit is there to be picked.
Boy, and I passed on that one.
I wish that schools could go back to more innocent times of 1984 when Van Halen published a song called “Hot For The Teacher”.
There have been quite a few posts on the Naked Teacher Principle on this blog. Is there an easy way to search for these articles? I do not see an entry for Naked Teacher Principle under the the Category header at the right.
Does the Naked Teacher Principle only apply when the teacher published the pictures herself? What if somebody else took or published the pictures, e.g. via hidden cameras in a locker room, or published by a resentful ex husband, or AI produced via deep fakes?
Yes, two ways: There is a Naked Teacher Principle tag, and when you search for “naked teacher” or “principle” almost all of the stories come up. Most of them have that tag at the end of the post, and you click on that.