On President’s Day in 2012, I wrote a dispirited assessment of where the United States stood regarding spreading American ideals and values to other nations. This was in the context of Barack Obama’s feckless foreign policy, which, as with his puppet stand-in later, Joe Biden, consisted of threats and warnings (remember Obama’s “red line” in Syria?) without credibility of resolve. I thought about the post as I was contemplating how J.D. Vance was getting mockery and criticism from the Axis because he exhorted our allies in Europe to begin a new commitment to freedom of speech.
The main thrust of the essay was the question of whether the United States should be “the world’s policeman,” a situation that now has fallen into ethics zugzwang: it is irresponsible for the U.S. not to accept the role of world policeman, and irresponsible for us to accept it either.
“Quite simply, we can’t afford it,” I wrote. “Not with a Congress and an Administration that appear unwilling and unable to confront rising budget deficits and crushing debt with sensible tax reform and unavoidable entitlement reductions.” I found the 13-year old post useful and thought provoking for perspective purposes. It raised many questions. Is the U.S. better off today than in 2012, when I was so depressed about its prospects and integrity? What does it mean to “make Amerca great again” in 2025?
I’ll have some more 2025 thoughts at the end. Here is the rest of that post:
***
Yesterday Congress and the President passed yet another government hand-out of money it doesn’t have and refuses to raise elsewhere, among other things continuing to turn unemployment insurance, once a short-term cushion for job-seekers, into long-term government compensation for the unemployed. Part of the reckless debt escalation was caused by the last President [George W. Bush] unconscionably engaging in overseas combat in multiple theaters without having the courage or sense to insist that the public pay for it. The current administration [the Obama Administration] is incapable of grasping that real money, not just borrowed funds, needs to pay for anything. The needle is well into the red zone on debt; we don’t have the resources for any discretionary military action.
Ron Paul thinks that’s a good thing, as do his libertarian supporters. President Obama, it seems, thinks similarly. They are tragically wrong. Though it is a popular position likely to be supported by the fantasists who think war can just be wished away, the narrowly selfish who think the U.S. should be an island fortress, and those to whom any expenditure that isn’t used to expand cradle-to-grave government care is a betrayal of human rights, the abandonment of America’s long-standing world leadership in fighting totalitarianism, oppression, murder and genocide is a catastrophe for both the world and us.
There are, you see, three choices: 1.) No world policeman, meaning no entity with the power and the resolve to lead the world to take effective pro-active measures to prevent atrocities, aggression and brutal oppression; 2.) The U.S. in that role, or 3.) Another nation in that role. You will note the prominent omission of a fourth option, the United Nations. The U.N. is corrupt, weak and feckless, with no prospect of being anything else in the foreseeable future. Its unwillingness to enforce and live up to its own resolutions regarding Iraq (with prominent members and officials secretly undermining economic sanctions by under the table dealings with Saddam Hussein) helped propel the U.S. into its Iraq debacle. It is doing nothing to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran, and is, predictably, deadlocked regarding Syria. An impotent, conflicted and corrupt U.N. is arguably worse than none at all. No, sadly, the choices are only three.
Ethically, it is an easy choice in my opinion. #1 is capitulation to chaos, and chaos is what we will get, in fact what we are getting. There is no Superman, no Avengers; there is no objective champion who can say and mean, “Enough is enough!” in a Rwanda, a Congo, a Syria, during an ethnic cleansing or a Holocaust. When a nation with power, credibility and resolve doesn’t do it, it doesn’t happen, and evil gets a dangerous and deadly head start.
#3 would require that another nation have military power, influence and resources superior to the U.S., which means that it could, in fact police us. It would also require a nation with national ideals that go beyond self-interest to a genuine commitment to human interest, human rights, human dignity, and human freedom.
There is no such nation. Only, in theory at least, America.
Which leaves the United States as the only possible champion to embrace the essential role as, in Paul’s pejorative term, the world’s policeman, or, as defined in the words of many great and wise Americans, “the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world”:
“We stand for freedom. That is our conviction for ourselves; that is our only commitment to others.”—President John F. Kennedy
“The issues of the world must be met and met squarely. The forces of evil do not disdain preparation, they are always prepared and always preparing… The welfare of America, the cause of civilization will forever require the contribution, of some part of the life, of all our citizens, to the natural, the necessary, and the inevitable demand for the defense of the right and the truth.”—President Calvin Coolidge.
“A man’s country is not a certain area of land, of mountains, rivers, and woods, but it is a principle; and patriotism is loyalty to that principle.”—George William Curtis, writer and orator (1824-1892)
“Where liberty dwells, there is my country.”—Ben Franklin
“Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and success of liberty.”—President John F. Kennedy
“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”—Martin Luther King
“There are those, I know, who will say that the liberation of humanity, the freedom of man and mind, is nothing but a dream. They are right. It is the American dream.”—Archibald MacLeish, author, playwright (1892-1982)
“In the future days, which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms The first is freedom of speech and expression–everywhere in the world. The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way–everywhere in the world. The third is freedom from want–which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants–everywhere in the world. The fourth is freedom from fear–which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor–anywhere in the world.”—President Franklin D. Roosevelt
and, finally,
“Sometimes people call me an idealist. Well, that is the way I know I am an American. America is the only idealistic nation in the world.”—President Woodrow Wilson
Well, it used to be.
Now I am beginning to wonder if there is such a nation any more. It takes security, wealth, power, courage, sacrifice and confidence to be an idealist in anything but words, and generations of reckless leadership and inattention to principles have placed the United States in a position where it cannot act on its idealism, because it cannot afford to. This means that its ideals are a fraud.
A world that does not have the United States as its champion has no champion, and a United States that will not be the world’s champion is no longer the United States.
***
It’s 2025 again. I found it more than a little ironic that my ending quote in that post came from the President who narrowly finished second in the Ethics Alarms “Worst President” inquiry.
I also find myself wondering if today I feel more optimistic about the nation’s values or if I have just become resigned to its limitations. I’m pondering whether I would write this post now. Your insights are welcome.

I don’t think the United States of today can serve the role of beacon of freedom. Too much of our wealth has been spent undermining that lofty goal. However, I think we’re currently on the path to restore that mantle. The United States is still the only nation that’s powerful enough and idealistic enough to take on that challenge. But we have to fix our spending, first, and I think we have to trust private citizens to partially take up the mantle as well. Civilians can’t do everything, such as ending a genocide, but those able and willing to can help spread knowledge, technology, culture, many of the aspects of soft power that used to be the purview of government but are no longer appropriate.
I agree. We need to focus on getting our own house in order right now, and while private citizens and organizations with means can certainly help alleviate the world’s ills, while the US government may have to be the world’s policeman, we can’t be the world’s babysitter.
“We need to focus on getting our own house in order right now […] we can’t be the world’s babysitter.” (bolds/italics mine)
But, but, but, but, but, but think of the CHILDREN.
Fair enough; OUR children are too fat, or starving to death (depending on the narrative du jour), aren’t well-educated enough, don’t get adequate health care, won’t have the life expectancy/economic opportunities of their parents.
Speaking of the the parents: they have wage stagnation, no savings, poor job prospects, are two days away from the dole themselves, the ones that aren’t already homeless will be by the end of the month, ad infinitum ad nauseum.
And Lefty wants the U.S. to take on mucho mas more that will need services several orders of magnitude greater?
I’m not a utilitarian/macro-economics guy, but I learned a looooong time ago that, harsh as it appears, picking up strays isn’t a viable long-term strategy, regardless of how deftly it ramps one’s Look At Me/I’m Dialed In/Gosh I’m Nice/Messiah Complex endorphins.
How much longer do you think the good ol’ U.S. of A can be:
*the world’s free haberdasher,
*the world’s free clinic,
*the world’s free landlord,
*the world’s free smorgasbord,
*the world’s free babysitter,
*the world’s free mental health provider,
*the world’s free jobs training/placement provider
*the world’s free educator,
*the world’s free transportation service,
*the world’s free police force,
*the world’s free disaster relief repository, etc., etc., etc.?
And to a world who’s hated us riiiiiight up until their time of need, [cue Jeopardy intermission muzak] then incuriously commenced hating us riiiiiiiight after their empty hat had something in it.
Free (frē) adverb:
At _The_Expense_Of_Others.
PWS