Oh dear. So disheartening.
Jonathan Chait is a policy analyst and pundit who has, in the course of only writing for progressive and Axis publications and offering opinions on similar platforms in the broadcast news realm, has shown himself capable of principled disagreement with his party (guess which) and progressive cant. On the other hand, he is Trump Deranged, as he demonstrated the last time I criticized him. Then he wrote regarding the first stupid “No Kings” protest in June, “The No Kings protests appear to be a massive success.” (My comment: “Success at what?“) But Chait is clearly intelligent and capable of perceptive analysis, which is why the tweet above is so disturbing aside from the fact that it forces me to again think about Karine Jean-Pierre.
She’s on a book tour hyping her memoir of looking like a fool almost every day as Joe Biden’s paid liar for two years, “Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines.” Jean-Pierre describes what she considers the Democratic Party’s betrayal of Joe Biden: “I watched Democratic leadership abandon, and in the end betray, a man who’d led our country through a pandemic and a time of historic political turmoil,” she writes.
Jean-Pierre’s gimmick is that she claims to be so outraged that the party pushed Biden to step aside as the Presidential nominee after his Presidential debate meltdown against Donald Trump, and that it “couldn’t articulate the achievements of the Biden/Harris administration well enough” that she has decided to leave the Democratic Party and become a political independent.
Talk about chutzpah: this woman is estopped from complaining about anyone’s failure to articulate anything.
All of her interviews have been incoherent disasters, as anyone who watched her deal with the White House press corps would expect. Chait’s question was triggered by a recent New Yorker interview. When the interviewer pressed Karine on an incomprehensible statement, she protested that her subtitle “A Look Inside a Broken White House” referred not to the Biden White House, where she worked, but the Trump White House, regarding which she has no special insights at all. Throughout the interview, she makes no sense. Take this exchange:
New Yorker: You lay out very clearly why you think Donald Trump is a threat to democracy. And, at the same time, you are suggesting that what happened in those three weeks was so serious that you had to leave the Democratic Party, even at this moment of grave threat. You said that the Party was trying to undermine Biden. What do you think they were doing and why?
Karine: Well, I mean, I just laid it out. I just said that there was an obvious campaign. You just had to watch.
New Yorker: Sure, but why were they doing that?
[Hint: Because he was senile, and the debate proved it.]
Karine: Because they believed that he needed to step aside. There’s more to this than just that period of time. This is very layered, right? There’s a period of time that I questioned what was happening and how do we treat our own, how do we treat people who are decent people? And then you also have to think about how I’m thinking about this as a Black woman who is part of the L.G.B.T.Q. community, and living in this time where I also don’t think Democrats right now, Democrats’ leadership, is protecting vulnerable people in the way that it should.
Oh. What???
New Yorker: Sorry, I’m not trying to be dense. I’m a little unclear about what this has to do with Democratic leaders and many Democrats in the country thinking that Joe Biden was going to lose to Donald Trump—which was what the polls all showed—and therefore thinking that he should be replaced.
Karine: O.K., wait a minute. Hold on a second. Nobody knows anything. Nobody knows what would’ve happened. People also thought that if you replace Joe Biden we were going to win, or have a better chance of winning. Millions of people who showed up in 2020 didn’t show up in 2024. We can’t forget that there was an incumbency issue as well. This is real. There are, like, several G-10 countries with incumbents who did not get re-elected. There was an incumbency issue as well.
New Yorker: I’m not sure what you’re saying.
Welcome to Karine Jean-Pierre World!
Karine: No, no, no. Wait a minute. You are saying that this was their thinking, and they were kind of predicting. But nobody knew what was going to happen. Nobody knew that Joe Biden was going to win in 2020. Nobody knew what was going to happen in 2024. People believed in their hearts that Kamala was going to win. They believed it. They saw the polling and they thought she was going to win, looking at the polling. Nobody knew anything. I’m only bringing up the polls because you brought up the polls to me.
Whatever.
So now Jonathan Chait is asking why this idiot was appointed as the White House spokesperson and remained there despite her stunning incompetence? Her stupidity and incompetence were literally on display for two long years: where was Chait then? You know: he was covering for the Biden administration and his team. Jean-Pierre’s fumbling the New Yorker interview didn’t add anything to what we already knew about her, including the obvious answer to Chait’s question. Why was she hired? Because she is a gay black woman, that’s why. For the same reason Kamala Harris was selected as Biden’s Vice-President. For the same reason Biden never fired the many incompetents he ended up with in his Cabinet: his Secretary of Transportation was inept but gay; his Secretary of Defense went AWOL but was black; his Homeland Security Secretary was a lying boob but was Hispanic. The Biden Administration emphasized group identification over merit and competence, and no one personified that warped and unethical position more than Karine Jean-Pierre.
Chait’s sudden decision to question her competence now that she is criticizing, however vapidly, his favorite party is a tell: he revealed that as a supposedly objective analyst, he can’t be trusted. Jonathan Chait is a partisan hack, just one who is smarter than most. Not sufficiently smart, however, to avoid alerting the world that bias has made him stupid.

Jonathan Chait (who, to my great chagrin, I’m often confusing with Jonathan Haidt) is nasty. Maybe because I’ve only read his worst stuff, or he got worse after Trump was elected, but he writes horrible, nasty, vitriolic waste. I’d love to read some of his stuff that isn’t so.
“Jean-Pierre was born in Fort-de-France, Martinique, France, the daughter of Haitian immigrants.”
Was she ever naturalized? How do all these foreign-born people get into the highest levels of government so quickly? Of course, being foreign-born was another aspect in her favor when getting hired by the Biden administration.
I see they include her being an “immigrant” among her other firsts: Lesbian, of color, etc. I can’t find anything on her immigration status. If it’s out there, it’s not popping right up.
I looked into this, and her mother might have been a citizen, making naturalization moot. In an interview, she said her grandmother came through Ellis Island, so her mother might have been born in the US.
Also in the interview, she said either her father or herself became a citizen at when she was 13. The statement was clumsily worded, so I am not sure which it pertained to.
But, Chait isn’t wrong. The “No Kings” was, in fact, a huge success. We still don’t have a king. I was worried we had tone and wanted to depose him. Nope. Still, no king.
jvb
Let’s not forget the Sacramento Kings, John.
Damn. You’re right. I didn’t realize we were protesting the NBA.
jvb
I want to protest the Phoenix Suns current/new ownership. All they got for Kevin Durant was … Dillon Brooks? What’s the opposite of addition by subtraction? Subtraction by addition, I guess?
Am I mistaken, or is this a new record for getting off-topic?
Ooops. Sorry.
If you give me John’s email, I can take this up with him there.
Or, John, just email me at fearnow1373@msn.com.
It’s all right – they made sure to change their messaging (“No Tyrants”) anywhere they actually had a King
Is that right? That’s really, really funny. Yeah, I can’t see a No Kings march in Holland, particularly not on King’s Day.
“Didn’t know we had a King, I thought we were an autonomous collective.”
You’re fooling yourself. We’re living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy.
But she herself didn’t believe it. From her memoir:
“The truth was, I never really believed Harris could win…“I’d been in the body of a Black woman all my life… and all my experiences of blistering stares and racist assumptions left me unable to see this country electing a president who looked like me.”
That quote was weirdly worded. She shifts from third person to first person in the same paragraph
Well, yes, Because she’s an inarticulate idiot who no more deserved to be a White House spokesperson than a goldfish.
To be fair, I pulled that second quote from a review of her memoir, and I think it combines different paragraphs.
https://hollymathnerd.substack.com/p/indepen-dunce?utm_source=post-banner&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=true
Ouch!
…and the goldfish community gathers to construct a grammatically correct and beautifully coherent retort to the shade thrown their way.
She actually said, “blistering stares and racist assumptions“? Wow. That is something, even for her. Did she forget we had a black fellow elected for two terms? If memory serves, Obama was elected by whites, not blacks.
Based on the transcripts from the interview, it seems to me that she didn’t even write or read her own memoire. The word salads above indicate that she was buying time trying to think of something pithy and important to say.
jvb
So what exactly is the expertise of a “policy analyst”? Can any one person really have anything approaching expertise in a category so broad as “policy”? Can they simultaneously understand everything from staffing levels for wildfire monitoring, to work requirements for welfare, to wind turbine subsidies better than any other broadly educated person?