A Sanctuary State By Any Other Name…Will Still Smell Unethical

Democrats truly are addicted to “It isn’t what it is,” or Yoo’s Rationalization. It is this characteristic that has led them so deep into George Orwell territory and why the 21st Century mutation of the party is so untrustworthy. “War is Peace,” and an open border was a secure border, according to Biden’s Secretary of Homeland Security. “Slavery is Freedom,” and President Biden was sharp as a tack even as he descended into gibberish on national TV. And, as we all know, “Ignorance is Strength,” and Kamala Harris was the most qualified Presidential candidate ever, ran a perfect campaign, and only lost because Americans are sexists and racists.

Maura Healy, the Democratic governor of my original home state (which has always been a little bit nuts) really opted in to Yoo’s Rationalization big time this week. She submitted a radical pro-illegal immigration bill to designate schools, hospitals, churches, and courthouses as official “ICE-free zones,” which would have the effect of sharply (and I believe illegally) limiting where U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement can operate in the Bay State.

Healy’s bill would require ICE agents to obtain a judicial warrant before making civil immigration arrests in so-called “sensitive locations,” effectively placing some of the most common public spaces off-limits to routine federal enforcement. I.C.E. agents would have to obtain a judicial warrant before making civil immigration arrests in so-called “sensitive locations,” effectively placing some of the many public spaces off-limits to routine federal law enforcement. The bill would direct state agencies not to allow I.C.E. to use state-owned property for enforcement operations and restrict cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities. And the proposed legislation does not distinguish between non-violent illegal immigration cases and criminal offenders: apparently in the Bay State, any illegal immigrant is a Good Illegal Immigrant.

3 thoughts on “A Sanctuary State By Any Other Name…Will Still Smell Unethical

  1. When and why did foreigners achieve favored nation status among the left? I think it’s a function of the subversion of organized religion. “Charity” has been changed to “Social Justice.” Giving money to the poor via church administered charitable organizations has been replaced with shoveling tax dollars to the victims of oppression. The big difference is that charity is voluntary, taxation is not. So, these morally superior people who should have gone into the ministry, have instead gone into politics and policy and social services positions and are hijacking the government and turning it into an involuntary charity. I wish these people would stop fleecing the taxpaying citizenry and get real jobs

  2. Is there something to be said about the fact there are three women in that photograph and no guys? Are women governing as mothers and making sure everyone is taken care of? Are men more able to accept that there are winners and losers? Do women want to make everyone happy while men try to raise children who can compete and thrive and take care of themselves?

  3. I wait for the dya when “sanctuary States, cities, municipalites, etc” no longer receive Federal funds of any kind.

    Stop SS checks, medicare payments, Federal retirement, all monies that come from federal largesses. Then await the cyr and the hue from the constitutents.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.