Free-lance journalist Michael Tracy pointed out on “X” that all of the “victims” who Rep. Jayapal demanded that Pam Bondi apologize to were adults at the time of their claimed victimization by Jeffrey Epstein. Tracy asked if any news organization bothered to mention that rather salient point, especially since the Left’s narrative connecting President Trump to Epstein rests on calling Trump a presumed “pedo”-by-association.
It seems the answer is no. I certainly assumed the hand-raising women at Bondi’s hearing were all sexually exploited as minors.
The Epstein obsession is such an Ethics Train Wreck, and such a dumb one my eye-balls hurt from rolling. If Democrats succeed in the mid-terms because of the duel mendacities of the Epstein innuendos and the even dumber “affordability” talking point (“How dare Trump not lower the prices our incompetence raised?”), I think it will be fair to say that the American public is no longer intelligent enough for a republic.
I recommend a conservatorship.
In an excellent Wall Street Journal piece (which I no longer can find) on what the Epstein files didn’t include, the author wrote that the news media and Democrats are focusing on Trump’s past denials that he ever knew or suspected what his fellow billionaire was doing, when what they should be focusing on was that he alone among the many names being exposed in the files “got the hell out of there,” as soon as Epstein’s teenage girls turned up.
But that wouldn’t be “advocacy journalism.”

Tracy has been following this angle for some time now. To a lesser extent, so has Matt Taibbi – but within the context of acknowledging Tracy’s work.
Pretty gross post Jack. Sad.
I’m afraid to ask, but I can’t resist: Why “gross”? Deliberately misleading is “gross.”
Maybe Marissa thinks the piece is 144 words long…?
Does anyone have insight into the suggestions that Epstein was embedded in the Deep State – specifically involved with the CIA?
If his operation was somehow supported by the Federal government, could that be what officials are trying to hide?