Dogs Are People Too, Sort Of, At Least When It Comes To Divorce, Says Pennsylvania.

I’m surprised that so few states have such laws: even with Pennsylvania joining the fold, it will only be four. I’m not surprised that I have read so many headlines in conservative media deliberately misinterpreting the bill. “Pennsylvania To Pass Law Giving Animals the Rights of Humans,” one read. “Dogs to Be Treated as Sentient Beings in Quaker State” read another. These are deceitful headlines, but as they used to say, “What else is new?” Several sources declared the law to be a slippery slope, allowing PETA crazies to get their way by making various forms of “animal labor” illegal while making veganism mandatory. That is a more justified position, but a basic ethical principle is not to hesitate to do the right thing because some may exploit the change to do the wrong thing.

Good for Pennsylvania. I can’t see an ethical argument against this measure.

2 thoughts on “Dogs Are People Too, Sort Of, At Least When It Comes To Divorce, Says Pennsylvania.

  1. Meanwhile, in NYC, there’s a bill to make having dogs indoors illegal. Because, apparently, Muslims consider dogs to be unclean. I want to ask if they mean unhygienic or spiritually unclean.

  2. Given the dogs/muslims thing going on, that’s the story I expected you to write about. Anyway, this one is better.

    Just curious, what did your wife think of A Dog’s Purpose?

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.