Quick Morning Thoughts About the L.A. Rioting

Haven’t had a cup of coffee yet and heading to a business meeting. But I have to get this out.

Demonstrations broke out in the Los Angeles area on Friday and continued on yesterday. The rioting aims to interfere with ICE lawfully and necessarily removing illegal immigrants from the area. The law enforcement has intensified its raids seeking people who are in the U.S. illegally. There is no justification for rioting ever in response to lawful government acts, but this rioting is particularly noxious. Not only are the rioters protesting legitimate law enforcement and interfering with it, the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department has said protesters have exhibited “violent behavior” and that “intervention became necessary.”

  • President Trump is sending in the National Guard. Good. If California’s anti-American, super-woke incompetents won’t keep the peace, than he should, strongly and without hesitation. I’m sure the Axis will call this decision “autocratic.” The correct word is “responsible.”
  • Classic: The New York Times headline is “Trump Is Calling Up National Guard Troops Under a Rarely Used Law.” Fascists pounce! The law is rarely used because American citizens do not often riot against legitimate law enforcement, and most state and local elected officials won’t sit back and let it happen. The news is the riots, not that the President has acted appropriately to stop them.
  • “President Trump bypassed the authority of Gov. Gavin Newsom to call up 2,000 National Guard troops to quell immigration protests” is the Times subhead. Deceit, lies and propaganda. Newsom wasn’t doing anything; his authority was ‘bypassed” because he isn’t doing his job. The National Guard is there to stop rioting, not to “quell protests.” The issue isn’t “immigration,” the issue is enforcing the law against illegal immigration.

  • Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the National Guard’s presence would “not be helpful.”Why would anyone pay attention to what Karen Bass says or thinks after her fiasco avoiding her duties and lying about it when the city started burning? 
  • Apparent, the Crazy Left is determined to die on the open borders hill. Wonderful. Last week, Boston’s progressive mayor called ICE the equivalent of the Gustapo. The people who lead the Democratic Party want these riots. 

More later, after I wake up…

Confronting My Biases, Episode 21: Graduation Lawn Signs (and Others)

Regular readers here know that I regard laws signs of all stripes obnoxious and borderline unethical. EA has discussed the dumb “In this house…” virtue-signaling signs, and I have mentioned several times the huge “Black Lives Matter” display another lawyer inflicted on the neighborhood for nearly three years (despite the several notes and news items I taped to it.)

Now, however, the current rage is graduation signs. It is hard to describe how much this increasingly popular practice makes me wince. The last thing in the world my parents would ever have considered doing was to put up signs announcing that my sister or I had graduated from high school, made the honor roll, or been admitted to college, in the case of both of us the Institution That Must Not Be Named on the banks of the Charles River.

In all cases, such signs breach the ethics values of self-restraint, dignity and humility. What are the parents in these homes teaching their children? Presumably, the lesson is to boast whenever possible. This is what social media is for: to publicize good news to friends and colleagues who have a reason to give a damn. Frankly, I don’t see graduating from high school in a middle-to-upper middle class neighborhood like Alexandria, Virginia as that big a deal. Are we seeing the sign because there was some doubt whether Kathleen would make it, considering her drug addiction, promiscuity and drinking problem? Are Kathleen’s parents trying to show-up the family next door, whose ne’er do well son dropped out of high school to become a pimp?

Whatever the reasons for these signs, they aren’t good enough. A family should encourage and reward accomplishments by family members privately unless they are trying to raise creeps who will run screaming through the streets, “I just got a job paying six figures! Suck it, losers!”

I don’t care that your kid graduated from high school or where he’s going to college.

I cannot close this chapter without expressing my disgust with three neighbors who still have their Harris-Walz signs out. It’s not exactly unethical, but it definitely is “Ick!” What are these people so proud of? Aren’t they embarrassed?

As American Sports Sink Further Into Society’s Deepening Ethics Muck, I Bitch (As Usual)

“A long, long time ago,” as Don McLean might begin singing this post, sports, the games and its participants, were where a young American sprout could find role models, innocent fun, and reliable ethics values. “Those were the days,” Mary Hopkin would warble back.

Item: Judge Claudia Wilken ultimate approval for the House v. NCAA settlement last night. approved the landmark, multi-billion dollar settlement of three separate antitrust cases against the NCAA and its conferences. Universities that opt into the settlement terms will be able to pay athletes directly through a revenue-sharing pool starting July 1, capped at roughly $20.5 million in 2025, the first year of the structure. About $2.8 billion will be set aside as back-pay damages for former college athletes athletes dating back to 2016 who did not have the opportunity to get compensated for their name, image and likeness Oh yeah, this will work out well. Didn’t colleges once exist for the purpose of educating all of its students rather than as big time sports money machines? You know, when sports were innocent entertainment and avocations, built character and social skills, student athletes weren’t employees, and college teams weren’t primarily the minor league systems for billion dollar professional sports leagues?

Continue reading

From The Ethics Alarms Mailbag: “Why Haven’t You Written a Post About the Musk-Trump ‘Feud’?”

Oh gee, I don’t know: because it’s stupid? Because it was inevitable? Because the news media is trying to pump it up to make Trump look bad, when what the reaction to the tiff really does is make them as well as the Democrats cheering for Musk look far, far worse?

I put the old reliable cognitive dissonance scale up right away to save time. The President of the United States is almost always higher on the scale than whoever his critics are. This was less true for Trump than most Presidents in his first term, but not Trump II.

Americans generally defer to their Presidents and support them when they are being criticized. The Trump Deranged, who are essentially mentally ill, are a special case, but they were Musk-Deranged too, because he was seen as an ally of Trump. So they burned his cars, and pretended he was a Nazi. They demonized him, and now they think they can suddenly flip-flop on Musk without looking like the foolish hypocrites we all know they are?

All the so-called “feud” proves is that Musk’s ego has no bounds, and his neurodivergence occasionally eats his brain. Trump gave him added power, prestige and influence: he’s throwing it away. Trump, meanwhile, is playing this exactly right. Musk is in negative territory on the scale: the more he attacks the President, the lower he falls and Trump rises. The more Democrats suddenly embrace Musk, who was supposedly a Nazi, the cruel killer of children and the poor in third world nations, the mean job-cutter and a chainsaw budget monster, the worse they look. Trump will get credit for what DOGE did under Musk, and Musk looks like a turncoat and whiner to turn on his patron.

Let him start his own party based on the “unsustainable debt.” That worked out so well for Ross Perot, who was weird, but not nearly as weird as Musk. What Perot’s crusade proved is that nothing will make Americans care about the unsustainable debt, and it is unsustainable, until it crashes the economy, which it will. The parties are handing a time bomb back and forth hoping that they aren’t the one holding the thing when it blows up. The debt will keep growing, because we will never, never, start paying the principle down. We should, but we won’t. Controlling the deficit just means that the debt becomes more unsustainable more slowly.

Yay.

Shut up and make your cars and rockets, Elon. This isn’t helping.

June’s Open Forum

I will be in a fascinating meeting much of today among various professionals, lawyers and activists seeking to address interlocking corrupt practices in the legal profession, particularly in mass torts. I am primarily focusing on the legal ethics facets, but the victims of these practices include hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of innocent injured victims, including veterans, as well as ethical lawyers and law firms that find themselves facing programmed financial disaster.

Thus I don’t know how much time I will have to catch-up on ethics events and issues here until this evening.

One brief note: Isn’t it nauseating to read the anonymous attacks from White House staff and other Axis hacks on Karine Jean-Pierre now that Biden’s paid liar is trying to cash in?

NOW they are saying that she was incompetent at her job? It was obvious that the mop-top was incompetent literally from Day One, and she never improved. She is a walking, talking, embarrassing, Dunning-Kruger Syndrome suffering personification of what was and is so wrong about DEI policies, but before the Biden scam exploded and the other awful DEI mistake, Kamala Harris, helped drive the Democratic Party into disaster, anyone who pointed out the obvious about Jean-Pierre was risking being called a racist.

That’s enough from me for a while.

It’s your post now…and if you don’t know why that photo marks this post, your cultural literacy needs an infusion. Meanwhile, this is the anniversary of D-Day. Presumably everyone knows the significance of that.….

So Domestic Terrorism Works. Now What?

Democrats successfully forced Elon Musk to abandon DOGE before originally planned by vandalizing his company’s cars, attacking dealerships, intimidating Tesla owners current and potential, and causing Musk’s business interests to suffer major financial losses.

Thoughts:

1. It is too much to ask for me to criticize Musk for reacting as he has to these attacks encouraged by Democratic officials and others. However, by quitting Musk validated an illegal and unethical strategy, one that will only get more extreme and violent now, I believe.

2. This is one more reason why I believe Trump’s pardoning the J-6 assholes was justifiable, though I would not have issued the sweeping pardons he did. The hypocrisy and excessive prosecutorial zeal of Biden’s Justice Department was palpable: the J-6 rioters were targeted as much for who they supported as for the laws they broke.

Continue reading

How Trump Deranged, Axis-Biased Pundits Ensure That Nobody Who Doesn’t Already Agree With Them Will Finish Reading Their Propaganda: A Case Study

David Wallace-Wells, described as “the best-selling science writer and essayist” for the New York Times who “explores climate change, technology, the future of the planet and how we live on it” wrote an essay called “Our Regression on Gender Is a Tragedy, Not Just a Political Problem.” That’s interesting: what “regression on gender”? Unfortunately, the writer was incapable of making whatever point he wanted to make without making his biases so obvious and obnoxious that I didn’t finish reading.

I wonder if someone like me was expected to.

I’m not going to fisk the whole thing, just as far as I read before deciding that I didn’t care what David Wallace-Wells thinks…about anything, really. Here we go…

“When Donald Trump stormed into the White House in 2016…”

“Stormed.” He walked into the White House after being elected just like every other President who didn’t inherit the office. Nice of the author to flag his bias and animus in the fourth word.

“….horrified Americans debated, almost endlessly, whether the shocking result was an expression of widespread racism (backlash to a Black president resulting in the election of a birther) or economic anxiety (the industrial Midwest especially feeling abandoned by globalization and the China shock).”

Note that the Americans who voted for Trump aren’t “Americans” to Wallace-Wells. The people who attributed Trump’s election to racism are the same lazy, demonizing, angry progressives who attribute all of their defeats (and failures) to racism (or sexism). Obama was a weak, divisive, arrogant and subtly racist President, and any backlash against him was entirely justified.

Continue reading

Picking My Way Through Alex Berenson’s Ethics Minefield

Alex Berenson is one of the former Axis journalists (Matt Taibbi is another) whose conscience and cerebrum just couldn’t take the lies and craziness of the Left any more and went rogue. He’s done yeoman work for Truth, Justice and the American Way on Twitter/X and on his substack. Berenson’s latest post there gives readers a glimpse into his ethical orientation, and it’s nothing if not thought-provoking.

Berenson makes statements that make me wonder if he’s worth paying attention to at all, however. A prime one is this: “I am pro-choice, though I find abortion personally abhorrent…Those are medical decisions, and they are governed by a principle of near-absolute autonomy.”

Why does he find abortion “abhorent”? Presumably it is because abortion most frequently involves the killing of a nascent human being who would have a shot at a long, exciting, productive and possibly consequential life were it not for another individual, his or her mother, deciding that her life would be easier if this separate individual’s existence were sacrificed.

Continue reading

Ethics Quiz: The USNS Harvey Milk

That name is sure to strike terror in the hearts of our enemies.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth today ordered the Navy to review the names of its vessels honoring prominent civil rights leaders and other figures of note not exactly identified with the armed services or its mission. The ships include those named for Harvey Milk (above), one of the country’s first openly gay elected officials and a Navy veteran who was assassinated; Thurgood Marshall, the first Black Supreme Court Justice; Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Harriet Tubman, the heroine of the Underground Railroad; Lucy Stone, an abolitionist and suffragist; Medgar Evers, the assassinated civil-rights leader; labor leader and activist Cesar Chavez, a labor leader; and Dolores Huerta, another labor leader.

Hegseth’s decision, reported by Military.com, is being interpreted by critics as an intentional slap at Pride Month, which is in June. “Secretary Hegseth is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the commander in chief’s priorities, our nation’s history, and the warrior ethos,” the Pentagon said in a statement today, adding that potential ship renaming “will be announced after internal reviews are complete.”

Your Ethics Alarms Pride Month Ethics Quiz of the Day:

Is this order responsible, fair, respectful and ethically justifiable?

Continue reading

Pre-Coffee Ethics Thoughts…

An early morning meeting I had to drive a long way for got cancelled at the last minute, and now I’m walking around like a zombie Maybe trying to type up a few percolating ethics matters will help me wake up…

Continue reading