On the evening of November 7, scenes of Jews being ambushed and beaten on the streets of Amsterdam were appearing on social media. Most of the news media couldn’t be bothered to report this until days later, however. After all, colleges and public schools were worried about the mental health of their delicate students, traumatized dangerously by the outbreak of democracy in their country and a result that didn’t please them (or their parents, in the case of 10 years olds).
Georgetown, one of the universities that has a diploma with its name on it turned face to the wall in my office, invited students to a “self-care suite” while its McCourt School of Public Policy offered milk and cookies, hot cocoa, Lego blocks and “Coloring and Mindfulness Exercises” to keep students from plunging into the depths of despond. Harvard, the other school with a front-to-the-wall diploma in my office, cancelled classes in mourning along with other elite universities, aka progressive indoctrination camps. So reporters and talking heads were focusing on the real news—you know, how racist, sexist, stupid, uneducated and irresponsible voters were not patriotic enough to embrace the empty and dishonest candidacy of Kamala Harris. Social media videos showed distraught and panicked Americans screaming, crying, and vowing vengeance.
I missed the Amsterdam story entirely because the headlines I glanced at, always well below the election freakout headlines if they were there at all, made it look like just another European soccer riot. Ho hum. It was a lot more than that.
This one is by novelist Anne Lamott. At least it’s well-written. It still is evidence of what the Axis propaganda has done to many previously rational minds, though Lamott is a long-time woke activist (she lives in California, naturally) so she probably is more a purveyor of anti-Trump hysteria than a victim of it.
She contributes to Salon, which is pure leftist propaganda 90% of the time. She called the Tea Party “hateful.” She actually praised Harry Reid, at last report being butt-raped by flaming demon water buffalo on a bed of spikes in Hell.
Her cry of pain is all emotional argle-bargle with very little paranoid progressive fantasy, but some. Nonetheless, treating the electoral defeat of a candidate as irredeemable as Kamala Harris as if it were the death of a lover is evidence of warped priorities and historical naivete, as well as far too little diversity in thought among one’s friends. Aren’t people like her supposed to be champions of diversity and inclusion? I have diversity and inclusion among my friends: that’s why visiting my Facebook feed is like watching a performance of “The Persecution and Assassination of Jean-Paul Marat as Performed by the Inmates of the Asylum of Charenton Under the Direction of the Marquis de Sade” usually shortened to Marat/Sade.
Sky News has been running a funny and disturbing program since the election highlighting the hysterical reactions of both anonymous Trump Derangement victims and some whose faces we know, unfortunately…
As discussed in earlier posts, those propagandists, fearmongers, irresponsible journalists, academics, “experts” and Machiavellian politicians who intentionally induced such unhinged reactions to a Presidential election are cruel Ethics Villains all. They should be exposed, mocked, shunned and disgraced.
I have followed every Presidential campaign and election since I was 10 years old. I have always carefully tracked the issues, competing policies and personalities. I have never been so emotionally involved that any result could or would cause me to behave like these poor people. I have also studied the history of campaigns, Presidencies, and the men who became President before I began watching and reading about history as it happened.
The Americans who are reacting with such extreme emotion, fear and hysteria are doing so first, because they have been deliberately deceived, and second, because they don’t understand our culture and the deep resiliency of our traditions and values.
The United States is better and stronger than these deficient citizens think. It is better and stronger than the unethical people who unhinged them.
In truth, I’m hoping that here we can find fascinating ethics discussions that don’t involve the election at all, but maybe that’s expecting too much. Over at the asylum that once was my Facebook feed, several of my once rational friends appear to be genuinely investigating where to move, you know, like Spain or England, where there is less freedom of speech even than usual. Well, these people have turned into morons, and I’ll miss them, but moron are a burden in a democracy, so “Bye!”
The Project 25 hysteria was one of the Democrats’ more despicable gambits. I keep seeing that list above or similar ones posted as Trump’s agenda. The list is hilarious, and anyone who believes that’s what’s in the document thinks the Constitution was written by Donald Duck and begins, “There once was a man from Pawtucket….” The website of the exercise , essentially a brain-storming session among many conservative groups, is easy enough to check, but know, the Trump Deranged hysterics would rather use a phony meme designed to demonize the Right than discuss the real thing. They deserve to live in Spain.
There’s got to be something less stupid to discuss…..
The Trump Derangement-triggered outbursts on Facebook continue to fascinate me. It is a public health phenomenon worthy of research. One friend, a brilliant professional director who had been posting some of the more inflammatory (and, frankly, just stupid) attacks on Trump before the election, announced yesterday that he was leaving Facebook because he “didn’t feel safe.” And he deleted his account. Several announced in high dudgeon that if you weren’t sufficiently furious and terrified that Donald Trump had won the election, they didn’t want you as a Facebook friend or a friend at all. Other posted mind-melting, pious and irresponsible memes and quotes: one said that every citizen now has a responsibility to act exactly as the Germans didn’t act when Hitler was on the rise. It had over a hundred “likes.”
In Harris’s (late) concession speech to her supporters, she told them to “fight” and “keep fighting.” Trump said that on Januray 6, and when the crowd went off and started a riot, he was accused of telling his follower to literally fight. He was accused of leading an insurrection: MSNBC repeated that canard all night.
Naturally, it never occurred to Harris that her choice of words was gross hypocrisy, and exposed the double standards Trump has been subjected to since 2016.
Thanks, Kamala. You’re an idiot, but that was helpful.
I didn’t need a magic 8-Ball to predict that I would be writing this post on November 6. Back in July, I noted the absurdity and hubris of this epitome of a progressive-biased historian—but then aren’t they all?—pretending that he sees all amd knows all. Allan Lichtman’s claim to authority is that he has this formula, see, and it allows him to predict with astounding accuracy (9 out of 10 times! Oops, now it’s 9 out of 11 times…) who will win Presidential elections. I wrote in conclusion,
[Lichtman] went on Fox News Sunday to bloviate that if Democratic delegates rebel against President Joe Biden and choose another Democratic nominee, it will spell chaos for the party. Lichtman, who is a progressive Democrat and once ran for the Senate as one, was relatively restrained on Fox News, but on MSNBC, he went full Trump Deranged, saying that if the Democrats don’t run Biden, it will mean Trump will win (his system says so!) and that will be the end of democracy!
Those are Lichtman’s warped priorities: he thinks it’s essential that his party wins even if it means electing an obviously deteriorating old man who won’t be able to do the job of President along with everything else that implies. A shadow government run by unelected apparatchiks, for example. He’s a Presidential historian: he knows about Woodrow Wilson, and still he thinks its in the best interest of the nation to vote for that. Lichtman is warning the MSNBC types—you know, morons—that all that matters iskeeping The Party in control. Having a virtual basket case in the White House? That’s not a disaster to this guy, not like he says an open Democratic convention would be.
The professor’s shtick radiates poor civic values, sickening priorities, irresponsible advice and worst of all for a history professor, a rotten historical perspective. I have no interest in his prognostications and neither should anyone else. Lichtman should go away now, coming out of his hole in four years like Puxatawny Phil to fascinate the same kind of gullible suckers with his election predictions as are entranced by systems to win state lotteries.
Wonder of wonders, despite his prognostication of doom if Biden left the ticket, once Kamala Harris was installed as Joe’s replacement, Lichtman’s infallible “system” found that she was going to win the 2024 election. That was passing strange, since his system didn’t include categories for babbling empty-suits who alternate between taking two diametrically opposing positions simultaneously and running on “My opponent is Hitler” platforms.
One might justifiably think that, as as a historian, Lichtman would give the only precedent for a defeated single term President coming back four tears later and running for President again significant weight. Grover Cleveland won, after all. Nope. The professor was certain that his formula was correct. Not only was the professor wrong, he was spectacularly wrong. “Right now after a very long night I am taking some time off to assess why I was wrong and what the future holds for America,” Lichtman told USA TODAY this morning.
It’s obvious why he was wrong: bias made him stupid. Gee, who could have guessed that an incompetent candidate chosen without winning a single delegate or running in a single Presidential primary, with the lowest popularity numbers of any Vice-President and a strategy that depended on not letting voters know who she was or what she believed, wouldn’t defeat a previous President of the United States with a devoted, even fanatic, following?
Well, there’s me, and, oh, many thousands of other people with a passing knowledge of history and a modicum of common sense.
Here’s a tip Professor Lichtman: add “Terrible candidates running incompetent campaigns tend to lose” to the factors you consider next time. Trust me: it works.
This was raised in comments on the last post, but it should be highlighted.
There needs to be a bi-partisan investigation. If I try really hard and indulge my creative powers, I can think of innocent reasons for there being so many more votes cast in 2020, but they aren’t the reasons suggested by Occam’s Razor. Wouldn’t you think the 2024 election would have drawn more voters that in 2020, since the future of democracy was supposedly hanging in the balance?
Does the chart suggest that Republicans were cheating too, but just not as well as Democrats? If nothing else, the statistics support the need for secure, trustworthy election procedures, and we did not have them in 2020.
Abe was the real winner last night. I have been evoking his famous quote about nobody being able to “fool all the people all of the time” for the entire campaign, and his faith in the public, American values, democracy, the Constitution and the Founders’ vision was beautifully and inspiringly validated last night. It was particularly satisfying that the People were, ultimately not fooled despite the nefarious effort of the Axis media, pollsters and corrupt “experts” to deceive them. Creeping totalitarianism was kicked in the metaphorical nuts last night. Good.
And now, a brief musical interlude…
I will await with anticipation the flowers, candy, hams and notes from all of the doomsayers, cynics and faithless out there (you know who you are) who rolled their eyes at my insistence several months ago that the ugly mess Democrats had made during the past four years, the cover-up (and not a very good one) of Biden’s senility, the gaslighting, hypocrisy and lies by the party and its media allies, and most of all, the Soviet-style elevation to attempted anointed leadership of a DEI radical leftist without any genuine qualifications for President would end in a national election rebuke.
Meanwhile, anyone who is not Trump-Deranged should feel almost as much satisfaction from Trump’s revenge on the Axis (“the resistance,” Democrats, and the their toadying mainstream media), which was not only a resounding Electoral College victory (And we see one of the great virtues of the much-maligned EC: showing a mandate for a winning candidate who has won a clear majority of the states and the varying values they represent when the popular vote is close. This was a Democratic Party theme after the very close 1960 election, the first close election since the 19th Century. (And watch how high his Electoral College soars after California,New York, Illinois, and the rest of the states that signed onto The National Popular Vote Compact go! Just kidding. “National Vote Compact? What elephant?”) Will Republicans and Trump supporters, having taken the Senate back with brio and the White House and very likely to keep control of the House as well, take moment to give the sneering, condescending, hateful, fearmongering Left the momentary but emphatic, “So there! You got what you deserve. To hell with bygones: you’ve been trying to undo our country, and your President called us garbage and enemies of democracy.” The Duke understood…
.If the Democrats and their media are capable of a course correction and a return to fairness and sanity, they will take last night’s result as decisive evidence that they have been perverted, and that they need to do some serious introspection, read some history books, get some ethics training, and reform. A panelist on Fox News last night opined that the loss would be good for the Democrats, because it would be a slap in the face (or a punch in the mouth) to shock them into returning to the party’s traditional values, and not to continue the march to the elitist, racialist, DEI-besotted “we know what’s best, Little People!” single party distortion of the republic that the Biden Administration embraced. The final insult was that they tried to foist off a phony, undemocratically-selected, babbling hack as a trustworthy leader, counting on her ability to avoid direct answers, to deny her previous positions, hinting at diametrically opposed positions depending on her audience…
…and to rely on teleprompters while the Left called the other party and its candidate fascists and an existential threat to democracy.
That is what the Left, and certainly the now totally disgraced news media, should do, because regaining the trust they have squandered is paramount for the future of the nation. I’m sure they won’t. Oprah’s galpal Gayle King whined to the CBS morning audience today, “What about checks and balances?” See, when the other party holds the White House, the Senate , the House with a conservative SCOTUS, it’s undemocratic! This comes from a supporter of the party that would have tried to pack the Supreme Court if it had the kind of majorities the GOP will have over the next two years. Funny, I didn’t hear the news media or any Republicans make that fatuous protest when Barack Obama had a similarly supportive Congress…
No, they won’t snap out of it—they are too far gone. Harris could have signalled a commitment to restoring the traditions of respect and official deference to newly elected Presidents by graciously conceding last night when it was obvious to anyone not in denial that the jig was up. Like Hilary in 2016, she didn’t, couldn’t or wouldn’t, but at least Hillary had good reason to be stunned, and she was ahead in the popular vote. Because Harris couldn’t show any class, courage or contrition, I don’t fault Trump for not mentioning her name last night. No Presidential candidate of a major party has ever been so disgracefully savaged during a campaign.
I’ve run out of time, but I’ll be back. The riots haven’t started yet; Trump winning the popular vote might stifle them, but I doubt it. We should all celebrate Abe’s victory, but heed the warning of Samuel L. Jackson…
I’m posting that picture because it made me laugh out loud when I first saw it yesterday, has made be laugh several times just thinking about it, and still makes me laugh. I’m considering blowing it up and having it framed. I’m depressed and exhausted, I’m alone in a big house missing my wife, I have a million boring, annoying things to do and no plausible reason not to do them, and whoever took this photo (and I don’t care if it’s fa; it worked) is an ethics hero in my book.
Meanwhile:
1. Confronting my biases, 2024 election edition: I’m really going to have to work at not losing respect for a lot of friends and relatives who have written and said some of the dumbest, most ignorant things over the pat several months. I think I really will treat them asif they have been suffering from some obtrusive malady, like Tourettes, making them scream out obscenities, or uncontrollable flatulence. Of course, this will depend on whether they can calm the hell down…
2. At the risk of summoning “A Friend” from Spam Hell, kind of like inadvertently using a Ouija board to loose and evil spirit on the world, I must note lawyer-blogger John Hinderaker’s excellent takedown of the email the New York Times sent its subscribers, including me (though I don’t know how much longer I can stand it). The thing really is astounding in its hypocrisy and lack of self awareness, and I salute John for saving me the time to defenestrate it. What struck me was how every single item in the Times propaganda piece was identical to the arguments of my Trump Deranged relative who doesn’t read the times. Who is spreading these talking points? From whence specifically do they emanate? The one that particularly interested me was the last item: “[Trump] also vows to avoid the pattern of his first term by appointing loyal aides who will carry out his wishes.”
How dare he! Hinderaker writes, “We certainly hope so! That is what a president is supposed to do, and what Kamala Harris surely would do, with the help of whoever it is that has been running the Biden administration and now would run hers.”
Ethics Alarms 