No wonder Trump has nearly been assassinated twice.

Koryeah Dwanyen, in her self-published book “Undercover Heartbreak: A Memoir of Trust and Trauma”revelas that she succumbed to the alluring pick-up line “Let’s have sex in Michelle Obama’s bathroom!” and travelled to Hawaii with a Secret Service agent she calls“Dale.” “No one will know. If anything, I’m the one who could get in trouble,” she quotes Dale in her memoir. “Like a mile-high club!” he allegedly told her.

And she did have sex in the former First Lady’s bathroom. The story has been confirmed by the Secret Service, according to ABC News. (“Dale” is now otherwise employed.) Meanwhile, Dwanyen says she submitted to his bathroom fantasy because she was in love with the agent. She discovered later that he was married.

Imagine that! Someone assigned to protect a former First Lady and who secretly uses her bathroom as a secret love den would lie. What is the world coming to?

After “Dale” came clean about his marital status, bathroom buddy Koryeah became patriotic and reported the agent to his superiors. He also had revealed classified information to her.

I think Trump should appoint Stormy Daniels to run the Secret Service.

I can’t resist. I’m sorry. It’s unprofessional of me. But I am so sick of reading the whining, caterwauling, insults and ignorance on my Facebook feed, and this video hit me at exactly the wrong time.

It speaks for itself…

Waiting for my oven to preheat, I watched a bit of MSNBC this afternoon. They were discussing Trump’s early appointments, and the talking heads and panelists must have used the term “loyal” close to a hundred times, all with the tone of voice one would expect uttering the word, “diseased.” The fact that Trump’s appointments suggest that he is only interested in departments heads and advisors who will be “loyal” to him and dedicated to advancing his agenda was relayed to the MSNBC audience as if the panel had discovered that all the individuals named so far are lizard people. Because, as we all know, other Presidents have reveled in appointing office holders who hated their guts.

Continue reading →

Well that was a mistake.

Medium, the pay-walled website for bloggers who don’t produce enough content for a blog of their own, sent me an alert about a new article called “When I Learned My White Friends Didn’t Care About Me” by someone named L.G. Ware. Well, foolishly, I decided to try to read it (I have a limited subscription to “Medium,” I don’t remember why.) When I realized the link was just a tease to get me to pay, I did a little checking around the web and found another version of post on a website I had happily been una-WARE-of before (I’m 11-years-old before my first cup of coffee) called Level. Not only was I presented with L.G.’s whining about how he knows white American hate blacks because they voted for Trump, I was introduced to many black writers who are under the same crippling (for them and for the nation) delusion.

Perusing the site is like having a window on what deliberate racial division-aimed rhetoric from the Left has done to the mind of black America, propelling race relations backwards. It isn’t just that you see either: the level of objective critical thinking these assorted essays—all aimed at black readers: less likely to be challenged that way—reveal also tells us much about how our politicized education system has handicapped large chunks of the public. “All looks yellow to the jaundiced eye” wrote a wise man, but he was white, so I guess nobody reads him any more. The entire Level site is metaphorically yellow. Let’s peruse it a bit, shall we?

L.G. has several posts there, but “The Day My White Friends Betrayed Me” is representative. This was obviously the post his Medium screed was adapted from. Some quotes…

Continue reading →

I woke up in the middle of the night and ended up watching the re-run of Sunday’s “Meet the Press,” which included someone doing a breakdown of the demographic groups that shifted toward Trump in the election. He kept emphasizing, however, that “college educated Americans” now strongly support Democrats. The implication was clear. Those are the smart voters, the educated and sophisticated voters. His analysis fed neatly into one of the most popular narratives the Axis is currently using to explain away last Tuesday’s wipeout. Trump voters are stupid. You know, in addition to being garbage.

College grads who voted for Harris naturally agree with that analysis: they think they are superior to those corrupt Trump voters and doubly superior to the large proportion of them who spent the years after high school earning a living and being exposed to the real world. After all, if they had sufficient IQs, they would have college degrees, right?

Continue reading →

It was just about two week ago when I returned to Harvard’s unethical and dishonest propagandist Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt to pronounce them Academic Ethics Villains. These two favorites of the New York Times are substantially responsible for the Axis of Unethical Conduct‘s Big Lie #6: “Trump’s Defiance Of Norms Is A Threat To Democracy,” a cornerstone of the Harris Campaign’s desperate “Trump is Hitler” strategy.

They had just issued another of their fear-mongering and academically indefensible Times op-eds, banging that same metaphorical drum with their (profitable!) argument that any genuine student of Presidential history (like they claim to be) knows is 100% hooey, and using the beat to argue for Democrats taking unprecedented measures to block Trump from the presidency….all of which defy previous democratic norms! The Levitsky and  Ziblatt hypocrisy has nonetheless become, apparently, a standard weapon for the Axis to use against Trump, as increasingly absurd as it. That this is true shows just how dire the state of the Totalitarian Left is following Trump’s victory: they really have no unbroken arrows in their quiver, just noodles and boomerangs.

And so it is that the “Trump violates norms!” argument has resurfaced already. From CNN yesterday on “Newsroom with Fredericka Whitfield:

Continue reading →

I have accumulated so many items, election-related and non-election related, that I am forced to get up one of the potpourri posts even though their work/response ratio is terrible.

I did have a moment of clarity regarding our Once and Future President, however. Trump’s insistence that he won the 2020 election, not just that it was rigged (as it was) against him, and not just that he should have won the Electoral Vote, but that he literally won it, as in getting more votes than Biden, has always been pretty embarrassing, especially since he never yielded on the point and repeated it ad nauseam. The claim certainly gave ammunition to the Trump Deranged, the Axis of Unethical Conduct, and the “Trump lies all the time” mobs. He couldn’t prove it, and it seemed like a scab that Trump kept picking at and wouldn’t allow to heal. I now think that it is possible that there was a method to his madness [“Hamlet” by William Shakespeare: “Though this be madness, yet there is method in it;” Act 2, Scene 2.] as there often is.

I realized this after writing the post about the history of Presidents winning elections after losing one. Only Richard Nixon won the Presidency after losing both the popular vote and in the Electoral College in a previous election. Usually losing Presidential candidates are permanently tarred after a loss; they are seen by both their parties and the public as “losers.” Why nominate or vote for a loser? Even in Nixon’s case, he felt the need to separate himself from his past: in 1968, he branded himself as “the new Nixon,” even appearing in a self-mocking cameo on “Rowen and Martin’s Laugh-in” (“Sock it to me??).

As a salesman and promoter, Trump had to know the toxic effect of being branded a loser, and “loser” is one of his go-to insults. I don’t think he really was convinced that he won the popular vote, but rather that he felt branding himself as a foiled winner rather than publicly accepting the reality that he lost was the right play. Trump could run as a winner, and if his obstinate insistence that he won in 2020 was a target for Axis ridicule and condemnation, so be it. It was worth it for him to never accept the label “loser.”

Dishonest? Unethical? Sure. But not crazy. And in the context of Presidential campaign framing, not very far outside the norm, if at all.

And now here’s the rest of the story…

Continue reading →