Ethics Heroes: “Diplomat” Creator Debora Chan (and the Netflix Series’ Writers)

What would be the odds that a Netflix Hollywood streaming series would come out a week before the election and remind the audience just how unqualified for President Kamala Harris is? I’d say looooooong. Yet that’s exactly what the second season of the smart, funny, astute series “The Diplomat,” starring Keri Russell is the role of her life and the always excellent Rufus Sewell, has done.

Oh, I don’t think it was intentional. I’m sure the scripts were written and shot too far in advance of the series’ second season debut on Halloween to have anticipated Kamala Harris being installed as the Democrats’ Presidential candidate via soft coup, then babble and duck her way to likely historical infamy. But the creative team—largely from the “West Wing” brain trust—did have time to intervene, stall the debut until after November 5, cut some damning speeches, something. It didn’t. These Hollywood progressives (redundant, I know) chose artistic integrity over the current woke mania for “making it look like it makes sense to vote for Kamala.” Well, good for them.

Continue reading

Today’s Desperation “Beat Trump By Any Means Necessary” Rhetoric Twist…[Extended]

What Trump said (in his interview with Tucker Carlson) about the odious Elizabeth Cheney:

Look, she’s a deranged person. The reason she doesn’t like me is that she wanted to stay in Iraq, she wants to — tough, tough person, you know, people get killed all over, she’s real tough, right? … But the reason she couldn’t stand me is that she always wanted to go to war with people. I don’t want to go to war. She wanted to go — she wanted to stay in Syria. I took them out. She wanted to stay in Iraq. I took them out. I mean, if it were up to her, we’d be in 50 different countries. No. 1, it’s very dangerous, No. 2, a lot of people get killed, and No. 3, it’s very, very expensive. … She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face. You know they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Oh, gee, well, let’s send, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.’ But she’s a stupid person. And I used to have — I’d have meetings with a lot of people, and she always wanted to go to war with people.

How the Axis news media reported it:

Continue reading

Ethics Quote of the Week: “Anonymous TV Executive”

I have some tweaks to make for this, but in general it’s spot on.

1. It is a stupid quote on its face, of course. Trump served as President for four years and the results were mostly positive despite deliberate and unethical efforts by the Axis of Unethical Conduct to undermine him. The Presidency is a unique job; by definition anyone who had been President (and not suffered a major cognitive decline subsequently, but that’s just a wild hypothetical) is more qualified than anyone who hasn’t been President.

2. What the anonymous (how courageous!) exec means is “if Trump wins despite eight years of 90% of the news media doing everything it it power to poison the public against him while covering up the vile conduct of Democrats” American journalism has no credibility any more and not enough power to manipulate our politics and public policy as its practitioners long to do.

Continue reading

4 Ethics Takeaways From USA Today’s 5 Takeaways From Joe Rogan’s Interview With JD Vance

The target is this USA Today story.

1. The quote everyone seems to be repeating is “It’s just strange that everyone’s accepting that this person who is the least popular vice president ever is now the solution to the problem and that the media machine in just a few days did this 180 and just sold her as the solution. And as long as they keep her from having these conversations where she’s allowed to talk, they’re able to pull this off. And the, the fact that it’s happening with no primary should be really concerning to people… because that’s never happened before…. they could have had a primary….”

It should tell voters everything they need to know to vote against Harris that even with the race so close, she refused to do an interview with Rogan for his massive audience of mostly young men unless he did it under her staff’s control and limited the interview to an hour rather than his usual three. This shows that she’s hiding her real nature, unsure of her abilities, a coward, a weenie, and a prop candidate. Why would anyone vote for someone like that to be President? There are no ethical reasons: the reasons that exist are all linked to unethical conduct and characteristics or non-ethical considerations like fear and hate.

Continue reading

“Hello Doomsday!”Month Open Forum

No matter what happens Tuesday, this is going to be a really bad month. I cannot imagine a scenario where it won’t be.

I wish I could say that I felt confident about my Presidential election prognosticating skills, but my record in recent years has been no better than that of a coin-flipper: I thought Romney would defeat Obama, who had shown himself to be a weak and feckless POTUS (and Mitt would have, if hee were not such a weenie); I was pretty certain we were going to be stuck with Hillary in 2016 too. I assumed that Biden would win in 2020 between Democratic cheating and the pandemic destruction of, well, just about everything, but I also expected Trump to end up as Herbert Hoover: the closeness of the election surprised me.

Pollsters, at this point, should just admit they have no idea what they are doing and give up. My faith in the American public and American political culture tells me that Trump should win, and would win handily if so many impressionable people hadn’t been brainwashed into believing he is Dracula while so many women are apparently more interested in killing unborn babies at will than the Bill of Rights and trivia like that. I still believe, or want to believe, that a Presidential campaign offering someone as obviously incompetent and dishonest as Kamala Harris cannot possibly prevail offering nothing but hatred and fear of the opposing candidate, especially after the debacle of Biden’s term. But maybe Abe Lincoln was wrong after all. If so, we are in very, very serious trouble.

In other more upbeat news, a poll of baseball fans in The Athletic showed that my view in this post is that of the majority as well:

Enough from me: now you’re on. I’ll be checking in periodically to spam the unauthorized comments of Denver Dave, A Friend, and any other banned commenters, so don’t take the bait if they show up.

Oh Great: “The Ethicist” Can’t Answer a Question About Lizard People Correctly

I think it’s time for a new ethicist to write “The Ethicist” column…

Kwame Anthony Appiah has been shaky all year, but he seems to be bottoming out. A disturbed inquirer who works in the I.T. department of a town government asked what he should do about his boss, who “frequently discusses bizarre ideas” including conspiracy theories about lizard people infiltrating the federal government and the Rothschilds as “vampiric blood drinkers.”

“It is not outside the realm of possibility that this alternate reality could compromise the director’s decision-making, potentially jeopardizing the security of our town’s sensitive information,” he writes, but although the concerned worker has gone “up the ladder” as we say in the ethics biz, none of the manager’s superiors think there is a problem.

“I am left in a difficult position, fearing not only for the security of our town’s data but also for my own job stability under a manager detached from reality. Is it ethical for someone in such a crucial role to openly espouse these beliefs at work?” he asks “The Ethicist.”

The last question is a legitimate one, so, naturally, Prof. Appiah virtually ignores it, only saying that because the Rothschild fantasy is a famous anti-Jewish libel, it “raises a workplace issue.” However, it is a workplace issue whether the manager is inflicting his opinions on the staff about the virtues of abortion or a plague of lizard people. The ethical policy is easy: co-workers should never proselytize others in the work place about anything and that goes triple for supervisors. Instead, “The Ethicist” turns in this direction:

“It also raises a judgment issue. Maybe their appetite for this stuff will have no effect on their professionalism, but why take the risk? People who harbor suspicions about vast conspiracies are, as we’ve learned, prone to being manipulated. The World Economic Forum’s Global Risk report for 2022 reported that 95 percent of cybersecurity failings were traceable to human error. People appear to be the weakest link in cybersecurity, and so a secure system depends on keeping track not just of hardware and software but of the people who interact with them as well. Given that you’ve tried getting senior management to do something about this, you’re entitled to act as a whistle-blower here and get the word out. I hope that you do.”

Continue reading

Six Ethics Notes On A Funeral

I just returned from the funeral of my former boss, mentor, role-model, Most Unforgettable Character (well, one of them) and freind, Tom Donohue. He died earlier this month at 86. Consider this a prelude: as soon as I’m emotionally up to it, I’m going to compose and post his entry into the Ethics Alarms Hall of Heroes as an Ethics Hero Emeritus. Tom deserves the honor unquestionably as you will see; this isn’t a matter of me boosting my personal friends.

In fact, my first observation on this funeral—which, you will recall, I attended a week early, spawning this rueful post—is that Tom Donohue is an excellent example of how many great people move through American life without being sufficiently noticed, appreciated, and remembered. Tom had a wonderful life, as Clarence the Angel would have said, and it was a productive, important, consequential life that touched many hundred of lives in a positive way including mine. A movie about his life would be inspiring and entertaining. Tom walked among the powerful and famous: one of his weaknesses (that I had the guts to point out to him, I’m proud to say) was that he was, at least when I worked with him, excessively deferential and almost obsequious to celebrities, a sign, I believe, of his usually well-hidden insecurities. Maybe this flaw diminished once he landed his dream job, running the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a role that gave him real power and periodic national visibility. I remember finally snapping when I saw Tom fawning over Ed Meese, Ronald Reagan’s long-time consiglieri and eventual Attorney General. “Jesus, Tom, Ed Meese isn’t fit to carry your laundry,” I remember saying. “You should stop treating him like he’s royalty.” (Tom’s response: “I’ll think about that!”)

Tom’s death rated an obituary in the Times and the Post among other publications, but few Americans know who he was. Heck, few Americans know what the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is: they think it’s a government agency. It is, in fact, a huge and influential national organization created by the business community (at the behest of President Taft) to serve as the yin to organized labor’s yang, and to advise Congress and the White House regarding the private sector’s interests in policy, national and international. The President of the Chamber has more power ( if he knows how to use it, and Tom certainly did) than most members of the U.S. President’s cabinet. Tom held that job for more than two decades.

Continue reading

Oh NO!. We Have Entered Some Hellscape Where Chris Cuomo’s Analysis Makes Sense…

There are few journalists I have less respect for than Chris Cuomo, who I would have long ago labeled an Ethics Villain except that he isn’t deft enough to reach that rung on the unethical miscreant ladder. Chris is just an extreme Ethics Dunce, and has proven it repeatedly; hence his nickname “Fredo.” Yet somehow, Cuomo has correctly grasped what so many of the Trump-Deranged cannot, a factor that is core to understanding the election. On his podcast, “The Chris Cuomo Project,” Cuomo said,

“You have some low-level culture war fruit, but I don’t really think that matters. You have pain in the pocketbook. And yes, there is a story to be told that we’re doing better in terms of most other places, major economies recovering or not recovering from the pandemic. But do you really care if, at the end of the day, things cost more? Probably not….which is why they’re pushing the “Trump is a despot” thing because they’re trying to make something more important than your pocketbook. And I don’t know that that works, and I don’t know that they should even be playing at it, frankly, because I don’t think they beat Trump in a battle to the bottom of grievance. I do not think they win that. The ‘he’s a despot’ versus ‘you’re a commie,’ I think she loses. And not because I think she’s a commie—I think that’s absurd, I also think the idea that he’s a despot is absurd. You gotta stop thinking that the people who support Trump are like Trump, that they speak like Trump, that they act like Trump. They don’t. They want to hire Trump to do a dirty job. They want him to be a virus to the political corpus. They want him to disrupt, to destroy, to demean those that they disrespect and dislike, the system that they distrust and despise. They want someone to do what they believe has been done to them and that they cannot do themselves. That’s why they don’t care that he exhibits terrible behavior because they’re putting him into a terrible place. If you’re sending somebody into the jungle, do you really care if they’re a savage? You see what I’m saying?

You may not agree. You may not accept. You may not like, but that’s what it is.

Continue reading

Time for Another Axis Election Desperation and “Win By Any Means Necessary” Update!

The Axis of Unethical Conduct—“the resistance,” Democrats and the mainstream media—have sensed the movement toward Donald Trump and away from Kamala Harris, and not counting its members who are in pure denial, it is, to use the technical term, “freaking out.” The next week should be something: it’s “throw it on the wall and see if it sticks, we can’t be any worse off” time.

For example,

  • Harris pretty clearly made up the story of her McDonald’s service, so Trump expertly trolled her by arranging to serve a stint as McDonald’s employee. Freakout. Axis hysterics screamed that it was staged. (Of course it was.) Outlets tracked down workers to criticize Trump’s frying techniques. Then, this weekend, we got this desperate effort:

No shame or decency at all. Continue reading

Ethics Dunce: Howard Kurtz

It’s impossible to keep up with our hopeless news media’s dishonesty and incompetence.

My five minutes of watching Fox News today (I have added PBS to Fox News, MSNBC and CNN as my “five minutes a day” sampling chores) yielded this inexcusable botch by Fox News “media watchdog” Howard Kurtz:

Exiting a discussion of the McDonald’s flap, Kurtz quickly said, “A freind of Harris came forward and said that she worked with Harris at McDonalds, but moving on….”

That’s completely false. That “friend” (she’ works’s employed bythe Harris campaign) did not work with Harris at McDonald’s and only said that Harris’s mother, who has been dead for 15 years, told her that Harris worked at McDonald’s. That’s double hearsay even if it’s true. X says that Y said that Z did something she didn’t actually see her do. Such testimony proves nothing, but Kurtz, because he’s sloppy or lazy or has a bad staff, misinformed his audience that the woman worked with Harris at the still unidentified McDonalds.

Worse, he’s supposed to report on news media ethics, and then, as a national TV reporter, gives out wrong information.

Fox News should trade Kurtz back to CNN for Jake Tapper and a box of Crackerjacks.

Note: The WordPress bot says I should tag this post “Heart of Darkness.”