There are few journalists I have less respect for than Chris Cuomo, who I would have long ago labeled an Ethics Villain except that he isn’t deft enough to reach that rung on the unethical miscreant ladder. Chris is just an extreme Ethics Dunce, and has proven it repeatedly; hence his nickname “Fredo.” Yet somehow, Cuomo has correctly grasped what so many of the Trump-Deranged cannot, a factor that is core to understanding the election. On his podcast, “The Chris Cuomo Project,” Cuomo said,

“You have some low-level culture war fruit, but I don’t really think that matters. You have pain in the pocketbook. And yes, there is a story to be told that we’re doing better in terms of most other places, major economies recovering or not recovering from the pandemic. But do you really care if, at the end of the day, things cost more? Probably not….which is why they’re pushing the “Trump is a despot” thing because they’re trying to make something more important than your pocketbook. And I don’t know that that works, and I don’t know that they should even be playing at it, frankly, because I don’t think they beat Trump in a battle to the bottom of grievance. I do not think they win that. The ‘he’s a despot’ versus ‘you’re a commie,’ I think she loses. And not because I think she’s a commie—I think that’s absurd, I also think the idea that he’s a despot is absurd. You gotta stop thinking that the people who support Trump are like Trump, that they speak like Trump, that they act like Trump. They don’t. They want to hire Trump to do a dirty job. They want him to be a virus to the political corpus. They want him to disrupt, to destroy, to demean those that they disrespect and dislike, the system that they distrust and despise. They want someone to do what they believe has been done to them and that they cannot do themselves. That’s why they don’t care that he exhibits terrible behavior because they’re putting him into a terrible place. If you’re sending somebody into the jungle, do you really care if they’re a savage? You see what I’m saying?

You may not agree. You may not accept. You may not like, but that’s what it is.

Continue reading →

The Axis of Unethical Conduct—“the resistance,” Democrats and the mainstream media—have sensed the movement toward Donald Trump and away from Kamala Harris, and not counting its members who are in pure denial, it is, to use the technical term, “freaking out.” The next week should be something: it’s “throw it on the wall and see if it sticks, we can’t be any worse off” time.

For example,

• Harris pretty clearly made up the story of her McDonald’s service, so Trump expertly trolled her by arranging to serve a stint as McDonald’s employee. Freakout. Axis hysterics screamed that it was staged. (Of course it was.) Outlets tracked down workers to criticize Trump’s frying techniques. Then, this weekend, we got this desperate effort:

No shame or decency at all. Continue reading →

It’s impossible to keep up with our hopeless news media’s dishonesty and incompetence.

My five minutes of watching Fox News today (I have added PBS to Fox News, MSNBC and CNN as my “five minutes a day” sampling chores) yielded this inexcusable botch by Fox News “media watchdog” Howard Kurtz:

Exiting a discussion of the McDonald’s flap, Kurtz quickly said, “A freind of Harris came forward and said that she worked with Harris at McDonalds, but moving on….”

That’s completely false. That “friend” (she’ works’s employed bythe Harris campaign) did not work with Harris at McDonald’s and only said that Harris’s mother, who has been dead for 15 years, told her that Harris worked at McDonald’s. That’s double hearsay even if it’s true. X says that Y said that Z did something she didn’t actually see her do. Such testimony proves nothing, but Kurtz, because he’s sloppy or lazy or has a bad staff, misinformed his audience that the woman worked with Harris at the still unidentified McDonalds.

Worse, he’s supposed to report on news media ethics, and then, as a national TV reporter, gives out wrong information.

Fox News should trade Kurtz back to CNN for Jake Tapper and a box of Crackerjacks.

Note: The WordPress bot says I should tag this post “Heart of Darkness.”

Commenter Chris Marschner’s observation that Kamala Harris is “no Jackie Robinson….She is tying an anchor around the candidacy of future black women candidates. Her campaign will be remembered” reminded me of an old Ethics Alarms post about Barack Obama. The fact that he (and Michelle, that feminist who has based her prominence, wealth and influence on her husband’s career and popularity: “Hear her roar!”) is viewed as having any positive influence over voters at all testifies to the fact that Obama played President as well as any POTUS we have had since George Washington. Oh, there have been many others as good at it: Lincoln, Harding, FDR, Ike, JFK and Reagan among the masters. This is the aspect of the job that Donald Trump is epically terrible at, and a main reason he isn’t leading in the polls by double digits. Obama, was the opposite: an inept and destructive President who survived his two terms, an election he should have lost, and, in all likelihood, the assessment of historians by looking and acting like a leader. From that post…

“The tragic legacy of Barack Obama will be recorded in three parts: his groundbreaking achievement as the nation’s first black President, his utter incompetence at governing and leadership, and his dishonesty and the dishonesty he engendered by those who reported to him. The first has been fatally undermined by the second and third, and the third, dishonesty, necessitated by the second, the relentless incompetence. The reason this is so tragic should be obvious to all. President Obama, like all trailblazers, needed to be a stand-out, exemplary performer to avoid setting back the causes his ascension needed to advance. But instead of Jackie Robinson, he has been Pumpsie Green, and that may be unfair to Pumpsie, the first black player to wear a Boston Red Sox uniform who knew his limitations, and did the best he could for as long as he could. It is also tragic because America, as much as any time in its history prior to the Civil War, needed a strong, wise, confident, unifying leader to deal with great and difficult problems that will only get worse with time. The challenges would have tested the best of leaders; for President Obama, with neither leadership instincts or talent, they have proven impossible. Worse, the basic requirements of governing have been proven to be beyond him, and he does not have the self-awareness or humility to seek the help he needs.

Key word: “unifying.”

One other note before we get into the weeds: I am always searching for signals regarding cultural emanations, and I am puzzled by the spectacular drop in Halloween decorations in my Alexandria, Virginia neighborhood compared to last year or any year within memory. This area usually goes nuts over Halloween. What’s going on here? Is it the election? Do people regard all of the “Harris-Walz” signs scary enough? Theories welcome….

Continue reading →

This made me laugh out loud. After my Trump-Deranged relative repeatedly defaulted to “If Trump isn’t dangerous, how come so many of those who worked closely with him now say he’s unfit and a fascist?,” I saw a Guardian headline in Memeorandum: “‘Fascist’, ‘conman’, ‘predator’, ‘cheat’: what 11 former Trump staffers say about him now.” So I looked at the article.

Continue reading →

Well THAT’s embarrassing!

At the end of the most recent post, discussing Amazon’s explanation for why its AI bot Alexa was telling inquirers to vote for Kamala Harris, I wrote,

“Can anyone point to an “error” by Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Amazon or Google that ever favored Trump or Republicans rather than their Axis pals and allies? Please enlighten me if there are any: I doubt there are. Amazon is “the dishonest waiter,” one of many providing lousy service to distort our democracy.”

Guess who pointed me to not only such an error in the other direction, but an error by Amazon itself, also involving Alexa? Me. I wrote about it in a post from a year ago called “AI Ethics: Should Alexa Have A Right To Its Opinion?”

Continue reading →

Well.

Of all of the lawfare attacks on Trump, one involving a disputed “he said/she said” incident that had far exceeded the statute of limitations ( extended by the New York legislature in part to “get” Trump), then funded by a liberal, Trump-hating billionaire, is a particular thin reed on which to try to hang this kind of hysteria. But it is especially shameless coming in support of the party that has repeatedly celebrated serial sexual predator Bill Clinton, embraced his wife who enabled him, ignored the current President’s documented sexual assaults on women and young girls, and whose icons, like all three Kennedy brothers, have as frightening histories as abusers as any American politicians in history. And who can forget Hillary pal Harvey Weinstein, and Bill Clinton buddy Jeffrey Epstein, two of the most prolific sexual predators who ever roamed the earth…and both Democrats. Or Andrew Cuomo, who secretly recruited the head of “Time’s Up” to help him discredit one of his “survivors.”

Meanwhile, the news media is embargoing any coverage of aspiring “First Gentleman” Doug Emhoff’s sexual exploitation of an employee and alleged incidents of abusing female companions.

Trump’s presence in the White House, however, would send the message that sexual violence is acceptable. This ad is epic chutzpah.

But the Democrats sense that Harris is losing, so anything, even flaming double standards and hypocrisy, goes now. I can’t imagine what they’ll try next week.

When we last left unethical Fulton County prosecutor Fani Willis, lover Nathan Wade had been kicked off her case and the prosecution was probably dead in the metaphorical water, in part thanks to Willis creating the appearance of impropriety, a conflict of interest, and proving herself to be grossly incompetent as well a contemptuous of prosecutorial ethics standards. She did all these by bringing her boy friend on as a member of her team and going on vacations with him. Trump’s appeal to have Willis removed from the case is still pending.

Wade and her honeybug faced an inquiry into their alleged conflict of interest, and both claimed their romantic relationship began in early 2022, after the grand jury investigation into Trump’s alleged misdeeds was already underway. Evidence that came out during the inquiry suggested, however, that both were lying.

Nathan Wade told the House Judiciary Committee last week during a closed-door deposition that Willis was preparing to prosecute Trump even before she took office in January 2021. That Willis approached Wade to mobilize the prosecution of Trump means the Fulton DA was targeting Trump while he was still in office and challenges to the 2020 election were ongoing.

More interestingly, the Committee grilled Wade about the meetings he had in President Joe Biden’s White House, with members of the Star Chamber J-6 Committee, and probably Justice Department attorneys. Wade billed his time for the meeting to Willis’s prosecution. His meetings were uncovered in court filings this year, but Wade claimed that the details regarding who participated in the meetings, what they were about and what was said just, you know, flew out of his head. “I do not recall,” Wade said when asked about the meetings. In fact, he said it repeatedly, as you can see in the transcript.

The Washington Examiner coyly writes in part, “Wade’s talks with the federal government has invited speculation that allies of Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris were politically motivated to assist Wade with bringing charges against Trump…”

Gee, ya think?