Thinking About “The Box”

I recently re-watched “The Box,” which my wife and I had first seen more than a decade ago. It is a horror movie based on the 1970 short story “Button, Button” by Richard Matheson, one of the writers of the original “Twilight Zone,” and Matheson’s conceit, a mash-up of science fiction and ethics as his work often was, had been turned into an episode of one of the reboots of Rod Serling’s creation.

If I recall, I didn’t make it to the end of the film the first time, because the set-up was so annoying. A strange, disfigured man shows up at a couple’s door with a strange box in his hands. It consists of a red button under a locked glass dome that must be opened with a key. The man explains to the stunned wife (her husband is at work, getting bad news about his job) that they have been chosen to be the recipients of a gift. All they have to do is push the red button, and the man will return to hand over a brief case filled with a million dollars, which will be tax free. However, when the button is pushed, someone, somewhere in the world, will die. He assures the wife that they won’t know the doomed individual. They have only 24 hours to consider the offer, at the conclusion of which the man will return and take the box away to offer to someone else.

It is, obviously, an ethics hypothetical that has been posed in many different ways through the years. What bothered me originally, and worries me now, is that anyone I would care to have in my community would ever push the button. (As you can guess, one of the couple does—“Why not? It’s just a box…” and a chain reaction is launched that causes havoc.)

Continue reading

Did Oscar Hammerstein Jr. Have an Ethics Problem?

A series of random events have caused my mind to wander over to “Carousel,”the second musical by the legendary team of Richard Rodgers (music) and Oscar Hammerstein II (book and lyrics), following their ground-breaking “Oklahoma!” The 1945 work was adapted from Ferenc Molnár’s 1909 play “Liliom,” and although it is a favorite of most critics (declared by TIME as the best musical of the 20th Century, for example, but what does TIME know?), its plot and characters become more troubling the longer one thinks about them. Rodgers said it was his favorite of his musicals with Oscar, and he was definitely in top form; I think his Overture to “Carousel” may be the best thing he ever wrote.

For the “hero” of the musical, Billy Bigelow, is a thug, a dolt, and a domestic abuser. I found the musical hard to take even as a kid for those reasons. When, in his justly famous song “My Boy Bill” after learning that he is going to be a father, Billy suddenly realizes that he might end up with a daughter instead (this only occurs to the big dummy two-third of the way through), his immediate conclusion is that he’ll rob and steal if that’s what it takes to raise her. Sure enough, that’s what he does: ultimately Billy gets himself mixed up in a dumb robbery scheme that goes sideways, and he is killed. The whole show is about his bad decisions and an ultimate opportunity given to him by God (or someone) to leave Purgatory (where everyone has to polish stars) and go back to Earth for a day to try to clean up the mess he’s made.

Continue reading

Is It Too Much To Ask For Elected Officials, Journalists and Educators to Read, Understand and Respect the Constitution?

Apparently.

Sorry, W.E.B….

1. Politico national investigative correspondent Heidi Przybyla went on MSNBC (where reality goes to die) and smugly stated that an “extremist element” of Christian nationalists hold the nutty belief that rights “come from God” rather than the government. “They believe that our rights as Americans, as all human beings, don’t come from any earthly authority, Przybyla said during her appearance on MSNBC’s “All In With Chris Hayes.” “They don’t come from Congress. They don’t come from the Supreme Court. They come from God.”

This woman presumes to interpret political news for the public, and she doesn’t comprehend the Declaration of Independence or its activating document, the Constitution. Both are built on the philosophy of Locke and Rousseau that humans beings, by virtue of being alive, have intrinsic “unalienable rights,” and that governments may not take away those rights or infringe on them. It matters not whether “God,” “the Creator,” “Nature,” “Providence” or some other designation is used to describe the origin of those intrinsic rights, because the United States of America accepts the bedrock belief that government is limited in its ability to dictate to its constituents. Przybyla’s position, in addition to being stunningly ignorant, is the rejected concept that underlies monarchies and other totalitarian systems. Naturally Chris Hayes, poor man’s Rachel Maddow that he is, didn’t have the wit, guts or professionalism to point out to the reporter that she sounded like a complete ignoramus.

As an aside, I should probably post one of the “My Biases” essays about how quickly my respect for anyone plummets when they tell me that they watch MSNBC. The network will literally make you dumber the as you watch it. How anyone qualified to do something more challenging in life than running a bait shop could be so naive as to trust an alleged news source that employs Al Sharpton and Joy Reid is a constant mystery to me.

The question is, how many journalists, prominent pundits and U.S. citizens are just as addled as Przybyla? Remember, these are the people who are screaming about wanting to save democracy from Donald Trump, but they embrace Przybyla’s anti-democratic concept of human rights.

Continue reading

Comment of the Day: “Ethics Dunce: The National MS Society”

One would have a difficult time finding a more measured, considerate, honest and probing analysis of the preferred pronouns controversy than Ryan Harkins offers here. You certainly won’t get it from me: I drew a line in the sand (Remember the Alamo!) on this long ago, when I concluded that such rhetorical demands from various minority groups were cynical power plays designed to make everyone bend to their will or be branded one kind of bigot or another. Ryan’s reflections didn’t change my mind, but they did make me consider changing my mind.

Here is Ryan Harkins’ Comment of the Day on the post, “Ethics Dunce: The National MS Society”…

***

I have struggled with finding suitable reason to cave and use “preferred” pronouns. I can conceive of numerous reasons to reject them: using such pronouns is manipulative; using them is forcing division; using them is an effort to force the world to conform to an individual, rather than the individual accepting reality; or if none of those, using them is an effort to band-aid over and thus ignore serious issues.

I’ve been considering that maybe being willing to use someone’s preferred pronouns could be a measure of meeting them where they are. In Catholic apologetics and evangelization, that is one of the best tactics in seeking conversion. Walk with someone. Get to know him. Understand his problems. Genuinely care about him, because conversion is not a game where one keeps track of points, but where one is selflessly concerned about this person’s salvation. Furthermore, St. Paul tells us in 1 Cor 9: “To the Jew, I become a Jew, to win over the Jew. To the Greek, I become a Greek, to win over the Greek. To the weak, I become weak, to win over the weak. I become all things to all people so that by all means I might save some.”

Continue reading

And Speaking of Unethical Lawyers: It Sure Looks Like Fulton County’s Favorite Lawyer Love Birds Are Going Down…

Good.

So many of my legal ethics colleagues have been bending over backwards to deny that the blatant conflict of interest persisted in by Fulton County D.A. Fani Willis (being sexually involved with one of the prosecutors she hired to try to stop Donald Trump from being her party in November) implicates her trustworthiness and honesty as a prosecutor. Maybe this will teach them something. The lesson: bias makes you stupid, and it applies to Willis, main squeeze David Wade, and them. Most of my colleagues hate Donald Trump as much as she does, and thus despite every indication that the woman is a legal hack, a liar, and dumb as they get in the elected DA category, almost all of these supposedly objective lawyers and scholars have insisted that she should not be, and would not be, thrown off the contrived Georgia racketeering case.

Right now it looks like she will be lucky not to be thrown out of the law and into a jail cell.

Continue reading

Open Forum: What Shall We Argue About Today?

Today marks the anniversary of Marines raising the flag Mount Suribachi on Iwo Jima to declare the U.S. victory over Japan in that bloody battle. Let’s if any media outlets mark the day, or if doing so would be considered “racist”….

Meanwhile, here are some notable items you might want to peruse, or that I might choose to post about if and when I wake up…

  • This poll, among several out today, suggests that the third party candidates announced so far all help Trump in a general election Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Cornel West and Jill Stein all take at least a percentage point away from Biden. That makes sense: the idea that anyone inclined to vote for Trump would vote for a Kennedy instead never made sense to me.
  • The mainstream media is taking a ridiculous victory lap, of which this is typical, over the likely collapse of the GOP House’s stupid Biden impeachment efforts. Since there was zero chance that the Senate would vote to convict Biden anyway, it’s a non story.
  • A new essay by Victor Davis Hanson nicely summarizes the full extent of the cynical and partisan cases pending against Donald Trump.
  • It’s fun to read how weaselly Niki Haley is furiously spinning to try to decide what she thinks about the recent Alabama court ruling that frozen embryos are human beings with a right to live.

Now it’s all up to you…

Ethics Dunce: The National MS Society

Here comes “The Saint’s Excuse”! The non-profit is furiously back-peddling after behaving cruelly, intolerantly, ungratefully and unforgivably toward the 90-year-old volunteer above. It will, of course, insist that it should be forgiven and trusted despite its smoking gun unethical conduct, and just watch: it will be, because of “all the good work it has done for a good cause.”

What prompted the kiss-off letter above was that 90-year-old Fran Itkoff, who had been an active volunteer for the the National Multiple Sclerosis Society for six decades (her husband perished of MS), had naively asked why names on documents she had received from the organization were accompanied by parenthetical pronouns. This, the Woke Nazis in command of the non-profit determined, marked her as hostile to its new “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion guidelines” and thus unfit to work for the care and cure of the dread disease (which runs in my family, incidentally).

The episode was flagged on social media by the indispensable Libs of TikTok, and an interview exposing the debacle hit YouTube. The National NS Society’s immediate instinct was to circle the metaphorical wagons, denying that it treated the volunteer the way it had, and implying that a 90-year-old woman made others feel “unsafe” because she dared to ask why stupid and presumptuous pronoun preferences were suddenly “a thing.” The organization also cautioned staff and volunteers to keep mum about the incident.

It didn’t work. The MS Society was bombarded with declarations from donors that they would cut off the charity. News organizations were closing in, with a Fox News senior meteorologist who suffers from MS, Janice Dean, threatening to give the story nationwide exposure. Yesterday, the MS Society issued an annoying apology:

Continue reading

Incompetent Elected Official of the Month: North Las Vegas Mayor Pamela Goynes-Brown

Why do communities keep electing officials who are ignorant of the law, history, and the U.S. Constitution?

Three days ago, North Las Vegas Mayor Pamela Goynes-Brown, (Guess which party!) announced on social media that her city would host a Black-owned business fair this coming weekend at the conclusion of Black History Month. The fest would feature local black vendors, community resources, an art corner and an area for children. Food trucks and live entertainment would enliven the proceedings. It would be a fun day of promotion for all participating—black-owned only!—businesses.

Who could have a problem with that?

Continue reading

Ugh. Ann Coulter Was Right. I Hate When That Happens…

Performance artist pundits as a breed are an ethics stain on public discourse. These are the glib, often attractive loud mouths who make their living selling books and getting speaking fees for being outspoken and outrageous. Many of them, not all but too many, don’t really hold the some of the opinions attributed to them. They calibrate what position is most likely to attract rage, controversy and publicity, and issue statements with the Machiavellian calculation of a hedge fund investor. Prominent examples of this slimy, manipulative breed are Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro, Bill Maher, Candace Owens, James Carville, and today’s topic, Ann Coulter, who might be the most cynical of them all.

She is not dumb, however. Occasionally she is even perceptive, as much as I hate to admit it. This was one of those times.

Continue reading

The Harvard University Ethics Train Wreck Not Only Isn’t Slowing Down, It’s Picking Up Steam

A Harvard University faculty group. the“Harvard Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine,” had the anti-Semitic cartoons above appear on its Instagram page. It is a newly-formed organization of Harvard University faculty and staff “committed to supporting the cause of Palestinian liberation,” as the group explains on its webpage. It “wholeheartedly reject[s] accusations that critique of the Israeli state is antisemitic.” One hundred and twelve members signed a statement that attacks “Israel’s genocidal war and ethnic cleansing in Gaza.” The group does not mention Hamas or the terrorist attack that thrust the terrorist organization and Gaza into war with Israel.

Rabbi David Wolpe, the Harvard Divinity School scholar who resigned from the anti-Semitism advisory committee set up by disgraced ex-Harvard president Claudine Gay, wrote at the time that he had concluded that “the system at Harvard… is itself evil.” In reaction to the above cartoons, Wolper wrote on Twitter/X, “The cartoon is despicably, inarguably antisemitic. Is there no limit?”

Continue reading