Biden Debate Disaster Ethics Train Wreck

Here’s the Latest Desperate Rationalization Democrats Are Floating For Why Biden Is Still Fit To Run and Serve…

/ Jack Marshall / 37 Comments

Wow, is this stupid. Yet I have started seeing it all over social media, and it’s being posted by previously intelligent friends, Democrats all.

Never mind the fact that most of those on the list are not working (some have very publicly retired) unless you call sitting down for an interview every year or so or “appearing” on a podcast “working.” The main reasons this argument is idiotic are that:

1. The fact that someone else is Joe Biden age and is not senile proves nothing about Joe Biden.

2. These are all entertainers and artists. What is expected and required of entertainers and artists is completely different from what is expected and required of world leaders. There is literally no valid analogy there. None.

3. If Paul McCartney blanks while singing “Yesterday” in a concert, he stops, starts the song again, and there is no harm done. A President whose attention and alertness is absent during a crisis can make an error with terrible consequences for the whole nation, and there is no do-over.

4. The list is cherry-picked. Notable for his absence, among others: Bruce Willis, whose family stopped him from performing because of progressive dementia. Willis is 69.

The Democrats, now in “Try anything! Say anything!” panic mode even beyond what I expected before Biden’s debate collapse, are literally tossing out every deflection and rationalization they can think of, hoping to salvage the votes of as many gullible half-wits as possible. If there is any justice, this dishonest tactic (and the increasingly desperate ones to come) will lose them at least as many votes as it preserves, because they are proving how untrustworthy and Machiavellian they are.

Post Debate Ethics Update, “You Can’t Get There From Here” Edition [Updated]

/ Jack Marshall / 11 Comments

Well, if nothing else, Stephen Colbert knows when to jump ship.

Last night, after 8 years of being almost entirely a Trump-bashing, pro-Democrat, pro-progressive, pro-Biden mouthpiece, late night comic Stephen Colbert (who also hosted a Biden fundraiser) decided to pick the low-hanging fruit and start ridiculing Joe Biden. Trump is used to this treatment, Biden is not. “They laughed at me, Mother,” the Willaim Jenning Bryan-based character Mattew Harrison Brady laments at the end of “Inherit the Wind” speaking of his previously loyal supporters right before Brady’s fatal stroke. The comics and Saturday Night Live had been one of Biden’s (and Obama’s, and even Hillary’s) most reliable lines of biased defense. If that crumbles—and it should—the President and his party’s fortunes will become even more dire.

Good.

2. Biden’s physician was obviously asked to release a letter insisting that Biden is in tip-top shape, based entirely on last February’s annual physical. Here it is. It raises more questions than it answers, primarily, “If this is true, then why won’t Biden take a cognitive function test now?” We know the answer to that; it’s obvious. Then the question is, “Are doctors ethically required to tell the truth in public statements?” Lawyers are. The answer us no. Doctors can lie if they believe doing so is in the best interests of their patients—like, say, helping them stay in their jobs. The final questions is, “What isn’t he telling us?”

3. Remember now, Biden tells the truth, and Trump lies all the time. Biden said on MSNBC yesterday, “All the data shows that the average Democrat out there who voted…for me still want me to be the nominee.” That’s completely false. A post-debate CBS/YouGov poll found that 72 % of registered voters believe that Biden has insufficient mental and cognitive health to serve as president. A New York Times/Siena poll found that 74 % of voters think Biden as too old to be President.

ADDED: Commenter Sarah correctly points out that this poll doesn’t prove Biden’s statement was “completely false” because it only references registered voters, not whatever Joe meant by the “average Democrat who voted” for him. Here’s a better poll from March that found that 61% of 2020 Biden voters now think he’s too old, and that was before his debate crash. Of course, who knows how “average” they are….

Continue reading →

What’s a Petard? These Are Petards….

/ Jack Marshall / 17 Comments

A petard is an archaic word for a bomb, before bombs were as big and destructive as they are today. The term “hoist by his own petard” means literally that some idiot blew himself up, kind of like this guy, except that in the classic example the bomb-wielder intends to damage something or someone else. The phrase is used to describe George Will’s condign justice,” meaning that a miscreant has reaped what he has sowed, received his just deserts, and “got what was coming to him,her, or it.”

In the future, when a nubbin asks, “Daddy, what does it mean to be ‘hoist by one’s own petard’?” the most vivid possible answer might be what is happening right now to the corrupt and Machiavellian Democratic Party and its corrupted allies. Exploding or soon to explode petards are everywhere.

An inventory (so far):

Continue reading →

The Radio Host’s Firing: What’s (Really) Going On Here?

/ Jack Marshall / 7 Comments

Over the weekend after President Biden’s less-than-reassuring interview on ABC, radio hosts Andrea Lawful-Sanders and Earl Ingram appeared on CNN. Both had held radio interviews with the President after his disastrous debate performance as part of the White House’s rehabilitation program. “Were those questions given to you by the White House, or the campaign, or did you have to submit questions ahead of this interview?” CNN host Victor Blackwell asked Lawful-Sanders.

Continue reading →

Ann Althouse Jumps the Ethics Shark!

/ Jack Marshall / 26 Comments

Oh-oh. This is more depressing news.

Althouse’s shtick is beginning all of her blog posts with a quote from another article, then she weighs in. Let me start this post the same way: here is part of what Ann writes regarding the news media’s rapid rush to condemn President Biden’s debate performance, what she calls ” a stampede.”

I’d really like to know who decided a stampede was the right approach and unleashed it while the President was still on the debate stage. Immediately after the debate, CNN’s John King was cued up to describe a stampede already in motion…As King described it, it’s hard to see how they even watched the debate. They seem to have gone into cabal mode to capture the post-debate narrative. Was it — to use Solnit’s phrase — “a sort of insider coup”? Who did this without knowing that they could — via stampede — drive their own candidate out of the race?…I want to know who led the “deep… wide… very aggressive panic” that “started minutes into the debate” and communicated it to John King and motivated CNN to present this as the narrative, right after the debate, preempting any normal post-debate analysis and throwing the Democratic Party into chaos. Did someone decide to risk everything to shock and awe Joe Biden into submission? Who could do that? Who would do that? And how did that old man — that supposedly broken down hopeless old man — resist? How could he resist? Who’s helping him with his hero story, which is going strangely well against the deep, wide, aggressive panickers… whoever they are?

What the hell?

It must be hard being a relentless contrarian, which is Althouse’s brand There is an obvious peril in working to say the opposite of what the conventional wisdom is, which is that occasionally the conventional wisdom is right, and a contrarian looks ridiculous. I hope that’s the explanation for that passage; if not, one of my long-time favorite bloggers has lost her frick’n mind.

What led her into this morass was an essay at The Guardian titled “Why is the pundit class so desperate to push Biden out of the race?”

It’s a dumb article by a climate change activist (among other things). Maybe Ann was having trouble finding blog topics; it’s happened to me. But come on: isn’t it clear why anyone with eyes, ears and a brain would be desperate to push Biden out of the race? He’s sliding into full dementia, that’s why; it’s been obvious for a long time, and dementia-sufferers shouldn’t be President of the United States!

The “pundit class” has another very good reason to “stampede”: trying to somehow salvage a scrap of public trust after being exposed as fully complicit in the Democrats’ Soviet-style cover-up. Is this so difficult to figure out? For Althouse? A lawyer, social critic and law professor Emeritus?

Apparently it is. Althouse’s commentary quoted above is at least as laughable—and ethically warped— as the Trump-Deranged Guardian article that inspired it:

Continue reading →

And Still More Post Debate Ethics: The “It Isn’t What It Is” Orgy

/ Jack Marshall / 15 Comments

The meme collection inspired by a week of post-Biden meltdown spin and recriminations now available at Power Line is unusually funny: that one above, using a memorable and poignant moment from the early episodes of “The Walking Dead” (Series hero Rick says, “I’m so sorry this happened to you” before shooting the poor re-animated woman in the head), made me laugh out loud.

I suppose I don’t need to state the obvious, but let’s make it official: “The Biden Debate Disaster Ethics Train Wreck” has entered the Ethics Alarms pantheon. It still isn’t funny, as Col. Jessup would say, it’s tragic. Our President of the United States is humiliating himself before the whole world (which he doesn’t run, despite his claim to the contrary last night). We now know for certain that this party that claims to be so concerned about democracy has been engaged in a Sixties Communist-style cover-up, deceiving the public into thinking a figurehead is leading the government while unelected and unknown figures are really calling the shots. We also know that the corrupt news media has either enabled this plot or engaged in contrived ignorance to avoid revealing it. (Check out Christian Toto’s piece about how Hollywood participated in the Biden dementia cover-up.)

In a column titled You Gonna Investigate That? for the National Review, Charles Cooke makes a cogent argument regarding what the news media’s supposed shock and surprise that Biden is sliding into shadow consciousness, as many (like me) have insisted for years, logically means:

Continue reading →