The Conflict of Interest That Isn’t, But Looks Terrible Anyway

David Becker, the top lawyer at the Securities and Exchange Commission, is suddenly an embarrassment to his employers. He and his two brothers inherited more than $1.5 million in phony profits from their mother’s investment in $65 billion Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. Since the S.E.C. was famously asleep at its post regarding Madoff, its negligence and incompetence allowing him to destroy individual lives, charities and more, having a key lawyer at the regulatory agency profit from Madoff’s scheme, even by inheritance, looks corrupt and unconscionable. 

Bankruptcy trustee Irving Picard is suing various beneficiaries of the fraud, including Becker and his brothers, demanding the phony profits back. Becker and his brothers, who are co-executors of their mother’s estate (she died in 2004, long before Madoff’s scam was revealed), are going to fight the lawsuit, as they have every right to do.

The lawyer was named S.E.C. general counsel and senior policy director in 2009, shortly after Madoff’s arrest in December 2008. He had previously served in the same role from 2000-2002, but apparently wasn’t involved in the S.E.C.’s failure to detect and stop the scam. The agency had ignored financial analyst Harry Markopolos in 1999, when he warned the S.E.C. that it was legally and mathematically impossible to achieve the gains Madoff claimed to deliver, before Becker arrived on the scene. The Boston SEC also ignored similar warnings in 2000 and 2001, but there is no indication that they were ever relayed to Becker.

His mother didn’t know that her profits from Madoff had been earned illicitly. As her son, Becker  inherited her money with no taint of misconduct. He has done nothing wrong. And it is far from certain that he and his brothers are legally obligated to give back the so-called “dirty money.”

Nonetheless, in a key government post in which Becker is obligated to “avoid the appearance of impropriety,” he has a major appearance of a conflict of interest that never existed. Still, what the public sees is an S.E.C. general counsel getting a lot of money from the investment scam his own agency allowed to occur.


Becker has an obligation to resign, for the good of the agency and to preserve the public’s trust—even though he did nothing wrong, and even though some people will take his resignation to mean that he did. In fact, I think Becker had an obligation not to take the appointment in the first place, because this appearance problem could have been anticipated. In 2009, Becker knew he had inherited money that came from Madoff, and that this would embarrass the S.E.C. if he was working there when the story came out.

He is leaving the S.E.C. now, bound for private practice, the victim, along with the S.E.C., of an imaginary conflict of interest.

And the human wrecking ball called Bernie Madoff continues to swing.

One thought on “The Conflict of Interest That Isn’t, But Looks Terrible Anyway

  1. The word here is “honor.” If David Becker, an SEC executive “asleep at the switch,” managed, without collusion, to make X millions of dollars for his “Mom,” wherein lies the responsibility?

    Millions upon millions of people lost their “all” to Bernie Madoff, and this SEC exec, presumably in ignornant bliss of what was going on, now is faced with the “horrible” choice of impoverishing his mother’s estate or quitting his job?

    Both should happen, I say. One: His mother’s estate did not DESERVE the profits it made, all things considered, and if David Becker was indeed “asleep at the switch” whose fault it that? What a co-inky-dink! Is Becker that one who spent 8 hours a day at the SEC watching porn? Don’t know and don’t care. But the appearance of impropriety is so strong that if he has to give back the money, it will be for the positive good for all concerned.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.