Sen. Inouye And The Duty To Leave

A distinguished life, missing one important act of leadership

A distinguished life, missing one important act of leadership

Washington D.C. and Hawaii are awash in tributes to the late Senator Daniel Inouye, who died last week, in office, at the age of 88. This is as it should be. Inouye was a historic figure in his state, a war hero (a Congressional Medal of Honor recipeient, in fact) , a statesman, in in all respects, from every source I’ve seen, the epitome of an honorable U.S. Senator and a good man.

But he stayed too long at his job. This is an obvious statement, since he dropped dead while still committed to filling his position for four more years. In 2010, Inouye ran for office knowing that he would be 92 when he finished his term. In this he was irresponsible, just as his former colleagues Robert Byrd, Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms and many, many others were irresponsible before him. Senator Inouye even allowed himself to become President pro tem of the Senate, placing him third in line to succeed to the Presidency, after the Vice President and Speaker of the House.

We do not need term limits: if the voters, as they do, choose to keep electing representatives on the basis of nostalgia, or laziness, or fear of change, or loyalty, that’s democracy, just as it’s democracy that they elect officials for no better reasons than the fact that they had popular or successful grandfathers, parents, and spouses. The presumption in democracy is that we elect leaders who are better qualified to assess our best interests than we are, and that means that we should be able to trust them to know when it’s time to take themselves out of the active process of governing, and to remove from us the opportunity to irresponsibly confer power on those who are no longer fit to wield it.

Anyone who watched or listened to Senator Inouye over the past decade could tell that he was diminished in energy, endurance, and vigor. Because I always admired him (and do still), I was disappointed to watch him fall into the centuries-old pattern of refusing to surrender power, position and prestige long after it should have been apparent  that his job and his constituency required someone younger, not only with more physical resources, but with a more current perspective. At very least, an 86-year-old man who runs for a six-year term is gambling that mortality will not catch up with him when the odds and common sense say that it will. In this he is gambling with the welfare of the nation, and for selfish reasons.

I am sure, because he was an honorable man, the Senator honestly believed that he was the best alternative for the job. He was wise and smart enough, however, to also know that this was bias, and that virtually no one at 88 is as able as they were, and rather than being better able to serve his state and nation, he was inevitably going to be declining in ability and effectiveness as long as he stayed in his position. He knew, out of respect and habit, his loyal constituency would never remove him from the Senate as long as he expressed a desire to stay. It was therefore his duty to leave on his own…for their sake.

This would have been the final professional act of integrity wisdom, courage and responsibility of a public servant who had many of them during his political career.

It is a pity that Senator Inouye couldn’t bring himself to do it.

8 thoughts on “Sen. Inouye And The Duty To Leave

      • Power is the ultimate intoxicant. Sometimes, after a long period of addication, withdrawal can be fatal. I’ll never forget my encounter with the once formidable Congressman Jack Brooks about two years after Steve Stockman unexpectedly took him out of office. He was like a doddering old man being led around. Literally. If someone hadn’t identified him for me later, I would never have known it was him. He was dead shortly afterward. Yet, up until he was voted out, he was the terror of the House committees with the power to make or break just about anyone. It was an object lesson in how power corrupts… and how fleeting is glory once that power departs.

  1. I have more faith in the electorate than you do.

    If I was in that situation, where I honestly thought I was the best person for the job (but wasn’t sure of my physical capacity to fill out my term), I’d leave it to the People to decide. I’d also let them know about my own doubts about my health, and warn them that early retirement was a distinct possibility.

  2. Perhaps my own experience has ruined my objectivity here.

    “The Prof” saved my life, basically, in 2005. He continued to provide unmatched medical care until 2010, and it’s still a matter of me educating subsequent endocrinologists about my rare medical condition, and advising them what to prescribe, based on what I Iearnt from him, and what I taught him from my own research.

    Had he retired at 85, I would have died around October 2005. I’d already lost 1/3 my body mass between May and July.

    He only retired when, in his own professional judgment, he could no longer guarantee he’d be able to provide an appropriate standard of care. Still better than most, but his reputation meant that his judgment wouldn’t be questioned as much as it should have been.

    I can still remember him fighting back tears when he got some pathology results over the phone regarding another patient, during an appointment.

    He cared.

    Apologies for the derailment.

    • I agree with you regarding the physician and his decision to remain active in his profession. However, a doctor or an attorney etc has the capability of determining the level of activity that they will devote to their work in their later years. A senator has no such flexibility if they are to be effective in their role.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.