Question: Why Is Supporting The Use Of Children As Soldiers Better Than Using Torture In Interrogations?

child-soldier5

The Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 requires the United States to withhold any form of aid from nations that use children in their armies, a clear human rights violation.  President Obama  waived the provision in 2010, as Samantha Power, then the National Security Council senior director for multilateral affairs and human rights, assured the media and the nation  that “the waivers would not become a recurring event.” By the terms of the law, the President has to notify Congress that he is waiving it within 45 days of making the decision. Monday afternoon, with Congress on the eve of a government shutdown and knowing that any such announcement would be largely ignored by the public and the press, the White House press announced yet another waiver of the law The new Child Soldiers Prevention Act waiver applies fully to Chad, South Sudan and Yemen. Congo and Somalia received partial waivers.

Here’s the text of the Presidential determination, signed by Mr. Obama:

“Pursuant to section 404 of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 (CSPA) (title IV, Public Law 110-457), I hereby determine that it is in the national interest of the United States to waive the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to Chad, South Sudan, and Yemen; to waive in part the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to the Democratic Republic of the Congo to allow for continued provision of International Military Education and Training (IMET) and nonlethal Excess Defense Articles, and the issuance of licenses for direct commercial sales of nonlethal defense articles; and to waive in part the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to Somalia to allow for the issuance of licenses for direct commercial sales of nonlethal defense articles, provision of IMET, and continued provision of assistance under the Peacekeeping Operations authority for logistical support and troop stipends. I hereby waive such provisions accordingly. You are authorized and directed to submit this determination to the Congress, along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, and to publish the determination in the Federal Register.”

I have some queries, as perhaps do you:

  • Shouldn’t supporting regimes that force children onto the battlefield be regarded as unacceptable as engaging in torture, and like torture, absolutely banned?
  • What possible benefit to U.S. interests could justify such waivers?
  • If there isn’t a left-leaning, Obama-protecting bias in the media, why haven’t you heard about this before?
  • Will the public ever hold this administration—you know, the one based on a promise of transparency—accountable for its repeated tactic of releasing embarrassing information when it is likely to be missed?
  • Will the public ever hold this administration accountable for breaking its promises and misleading the nation using loyal lackeys in high appointed positions, who are then rewarded for their dirty work? (The above mentioned Samantha Power is now the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.)
  • Whose Nobel Peace Prize is a greater embarrassment to the awarding committee: Yassir Arafat’s, or Barack Obama’s?
  • The current GOP impasse with the White House is, at its core, rooted in the fact that the Republicans don’t trust the President to mean what he says, stick to any principle, or be open and honest to the American people. Considering these waivers, I have to ask: why should they?
  • Why should anyone?

________________________

Pointer: Instapundit

Facts: Washington Examiner, Digital Journal

Graphic: Asymetric Warfare Studies Group

8 thoughts on “Question: Why Is Supporting The Use Of Children As Soldiers Better Than Using Torture In Interrogations?

  1. But Obama is black and this have to do with Africa. We have to let him do what he wants because for anyone to question it would be racist. Haven’t you figured that out yet? We can’t hold aid to the suffering people of these countries hostage to such a patronizing law that is based on a Eurocentric view of the world. We must send aid to these people so their corrupt leadership has something to loot. Why can’t you understand these things?

    • Yes, Bush signed that law into being, and Obama is waiving it. Just another one of those “elections have consequences for 10-year-old conscripted into the military” moments, I guess. I’m sorry, I am awash in cynicism today.

    • Why can’t you understand these things?
      *************
      Yes, Jack, get with the program.
      You have no business posting about Obama doing good works, which you clearly don’t understand, when those uncooperative, ignorant, backwoods swamp bigots (Republicans) are forcing our ever so perfect, Swiss watch government to close down, just so they can mess with a post racial Lord and Savior, who finds his days in the White House to be “enchanting”.

      I don’t even know why I read this blather anymore.

  2. Well, you normally don’t want to stop humanitarian aid for any reason (as long as it’s getting to the people who need it). The article says this is about “non-lethal assistance and peace-keeping support,” and I can’t tell if that qualifies as humanitarian aid or not.

    • As we all know, though, Mark—“humanitarian aid,” especially in countries willing to send their young, innocent and vulnerable under hostile gunfire, is likely to end up doing non-humanitarian things. There may be legal distinctions, but I’m dubious about there being real ones.

  3. Any “humanitarian aid” packaged up as such goes straight to the bad guys and not those that are truly suffering. Period. Tell me it is for “non-lethal assistance and peace keeping” that is such a lie. And I am mad as hell about Obama and his agenda. What has humanitarian aid ever done for this country that does not get thrown back in our face.

    Another narcissistic act by “our” leader.

    I am sick of writing to the White House. I am sure they are sick of me too. I expect the door bell to ring any moment.

  4. Pingback: Op-Ed: Obama provides aid to countries with child soldiers |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.