Adam Wainwright’s Foul All-Star Ethics

"Boy, I'm  glad Wainwright threw me a pitch a Little Leaguer could hit, because I'm just about done. I sure hope he tells everyone about it,.."

“Boy, I’m glad Wainwright threw me a pitch a Little Leaguer could hit, because I’m just about done. I sure hope he tells everyone about it,..”

St. Louis Cardinals pitching ace Adam Wainwright lost MLB’s 2014 All-Star Game for the National League (though he was not the official losing pitcher). He gave up three quick runs in the first inning, and his squad never overcame the deficit, losing 5-3. As a result, his league’s champion at the end of the season, which could conceivably be his own team, will labor at a disadvantage: the league that wins the All-Star game get the home advantage, which recently, at least, has been decisive.

None of that reflects poorly on the pitcher. He got hit hard by a group of likely Hall of Famers (Derek Jeter, Mike Trout, Robinson Cano and Miguel Cabrera) in an exhibition game that doesn’t count in the standings. So what?

This, however, does reflect poorly on Wainwright:

The game began with a long ovation for AL lead-off batter Derek Jeter, the Yankee shortstop who is retiring after this season following a storied career. Wainwright, in what appeared to be a class move, placed his glove and the ball on the mound in Minnesota’s Target Field and  stepped off to applaud, becoming, for a moment, just another fan giving a well-earned tribute to an all-time great. Then, three pitches into Jeter’s at bat, the living legend lined a ringing double to right field as if scripted, giving the crowd another chance to cheer, and triggering the American League’s winning rally. Later, in the dugout being interviewed on live TV, Wainwright announced that he had given Jeter “a couple of pipe shots”—that is, grooved his pitches so Jeter could get a hit.

Horrible. This is wrong in every way, no matter how you turn it—poor sportsmanship, disrespectful to Jeter, damaging to the game, and dumb:

  • Baseball, even the All-Star Game, isn’t pro wrestling. The fans presume that the game is on the level, and being played with competitive fire, and there once was never any doubt that this was the case. Around the time the players became millionaires and behaved as if they were doing the fans a favor by even showing up, the competitive legitimacy of the game was eroded, reaching its nadir in the 2002  game where both managers appeared more interested in letting all of their prima donnas play than winning, resulting in an extra-inning tie because nobody was left who could pitch. Thus the Lords of Baseball made the (much derided) decision to make the game “count” by letting its outcome determine the World Series home field advantage. A starting pitcher whose lousy performance sends his team to a loss announcing that he was trying to give up hits—it doesn’t matter to whom or why—undermines the integrity, reputation and legitimacy of the All-Star Game itself.
  • If this was supposed to be a gesture of respect to Jeter, a follow-though to Wainwright’s glove and ball display, it was completely destroyed by Wainwright’s announcing it to the world. Is he so stupid that he can’t see that? Everyone is talking about the classy Yankee captain, forty years young and still able to rise to the occasion even against the best of the National League, and Wainwright says, “Well, actually it was a batting practice pitch. Because I respect him so much! ” If you respect him, treat him as if he can hit your best pitch, ass. If you respect him, don’t diminish his dramatic moment by taking credit for it yourself, jerk.
  • Then there is the disgusting possibility that Wainwright was lying, and that he was trying to simultaneously look magnanimous while deflecting the inevitable criticism over the disastrous results of his pitching. This would be the worst of all. And yet, incredibly, this is what Wainwright decided was the best spin he could put on his irresponsible, harmful and disrespectful comments. When the predictable uproar over his “pipe shots” line began to swell, Wainwright tried to recant, saying that he was “joking.” As in “lying.” Did you hear anyone laughing, Adam?

This is the rare damaging statement that cannot be undone, nor will any apology suffice.

Baseball has been around for about 15o years now, and while something new seems to happen every day (one of the joys of the game), this fiasco isn’t unprecedented. When another great shortstop, Baltimore’s Cal Ripken, played in his last All-Star Game, the pitcher who gave up his dramatic home run later intimated that the pitch had been grooved. The sheen on Mickey Mantle’s final home run in his last season in 1968 was reduced to a glimmer by the revelation that pitcher Denny McLain had made certain that Mantle knew exactly where a medium-speed fastball would be thrown. Mickey was reportedly grateful, but neither he nor McClain (who ended up in Federal prison at one point) were towering intellects blessed with ethical perception.

I have long believed that statements like Wainwright’s, true or false, should result in fines and suspensions. It is cheating, but worse: it is the equivalent of point-shaving in basketball. At very least, Adam Wainwright should never be invited to another All-Star Game.

UPDATE: A belayed Kaboom! for Sirius-XM MLB commentators Jeff Joyce and Mike Stanton spew the worst series of rationalizations for Wainwright imaginable:

  • “Hey, remember that All- Star game when Justin Verlander gave up 5 runs in the first and said he was just trying to light up the radar gun? He didn’t get that much criticism…” Well, he should have. And he didn’t make that excuse when it undermined a great player’s last All-Star hurrah.
  • “Verlander said that he was trying to entertain the fans. He’s right. It’s for entertainment! The fans want to see him throw 100 mph!” That’s garbage. The fans want to see great players play great baseball, not stink up the joint doing what they would never do in a real game.
  • “Wainwright didn’t make a big deal about saying Jeter got a grooved pitch…he just answered a question.” Yes, he just answered a question offensively and stupidly, and spoiled a great baseball moment, for Jeter and the game.

Boy, baseball commentators are clueless about ethics. It’s remarkable.

 

________________________

Sources: USA Today, Hardball Times

Graphic: WJLA

6 thoughts on “Adam Wainwright’s Foul All-Star Ethics

  1. first:
    “The home team is 18-18 in World Series Game 7s. That’s right: home-field advantage in Game 7 has, quite literally, no advantage at all.”

    in fact, its quite presumptive and misleading to call it “advantage.” situationally, playing at home on any given day could be a disadvantage (sunlight, weather, etc).

    “And since 2003, when the All-Star game began to decide the home team, the World Series has gone to seven games only once.”

    so wainrights pitch statistically is irrelevant. how about ethically?

    well, based on the points above, the all star game is reduced to a supposedly competitive exhibition game with no statistical importance.

    for the game of baseball as a whole, and for fans…it is better to see jeter do well in his final all star game than to see him strike out in a statisticslly irrelevant game.

    should a player play hard and play to win? yes….
    should we honor jeter in a statistically irrelevant exhibition match? yes….
    should a player make another player look bad in his final historic statisticslly irrelevant game? hmmm, not so sure thats ethical.

    • The fact that the home team is 18-18 doesn’t prove it’s not an advantage. If the teams were always of equal strength, it would suggest that, but we know it does not. Baseball has the least home advantage of any sport, but the advantage is real, if only because batting last in extra inning games gives a slight edge. It’s a small sample–maybe the home teams have been the weaker of the two, and without the advantage, they would have lost more of those series.

    • They may be 18-18 in game 7, but most World Series do not go all seven. The team with home field does not have to win on the road to be champion, but the other one must. With the Series on a 2-3-2 format home field plays a bigger factor than in other formats.
      What are the statistics for home field advantage overall? I could not find for the entityof history, but in the last 28 years you can count on one hand the number of teams without home field advantage that have won it. Yes, home field teams are 23-5 in that time.

  2. Is it even remotely possible that Wainwright was “challenging the hitter?”

    I do believe that is one way to interpret what Wainwright meant by “pipe shots” – even when including his saying additionally, “[Jeter] deserved it,” and then following that with, “I didn’t know he was gonna hit a double or I might have changed my mind.”

    A confident pitcher might say something just like that, and be interpreted as “grooving” his pitch, when in fact what he meant was something like: “Sure, he’s great, but I can beat him, so, I decided to challenge him because he’s great. I didn’t expect him to hit like that, but there he went, hitting a double; if I had thought he was gonna hit me like that when I challenged him, I would have mixed-up my pitches differently.”

    I know – a certain Razor applies. You’ve taught me well. I just don’t want Wainwright to lose eligibility for “legend” status because of this.

    • He’s a great pitcher. He doesn’t have to be a smart pitcher too (see: Rube Waddell).

      I think your theory is a stretch, given the rest of his statement. But I hadn’t considered that possibility, and it is that, though barely. Wainwright owes you a pipe shot.

      • Despite the risk of aggravating sciatica and leaving each of four more vertebrae pointing to a different direction on the compass, I would be delighted to take a swing!

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.