It is crucial to understand is that if you are willing to discard ethical values as soon as they become inconvenient, you never really accepted them in the first place.
Thus Australia’s looming decision to take away the passports of previously convicted pedophiles because officials are sure that some of them are taking child sex “vacations” to Asian nations active in the illegal trade tells us that when it is crunch time down under, ethics is disposable.
Under a proposed new law backed by the Prime Minister and the judiciary that still needs to be approved by the Australian Parliament, registered child sex offenders will lose their Australian passports as a draconian measure aimed at preventing pedophiles from abusing children in foreign lands. Advocates proudly call the policy a “world first” in the fight against child sex tourism.
They don’t get it, but then, many people don’t. Many American communities continue to oppress registered sex offenders after they have paid their debts to society, restricting their access to public places like libraries and parks. Vigilante groups publish their addresses so they are subject to harassment and worse. The Constitution, however, limits the extent of the abuse, though that still doesn’t make what many registered sex offenders endure just or fair. Australia has no such limitation.
“The Australian” reports that the law would affect an estimated 20,000 registered offenders who have served their sentences but are still under supervision. Last year, approximately 800 Australian registered child sex offenders traveled overseas. Half of them went to Southeast Asia, where child sex-trafficking is epidemic. Nobody knows how many of the 400 or so travelers actually engaged in the criminal activity, but never mind: Think of the children! Undoubtedly some of the past offenders were traveling to do disgusting things to innocents, and if even one child is saved….well, you know the rationalizations. Here are the ones the Australians appear to be relying upon:
- The Saint’s Excuse: “It’s for a good cause”
- The Comparative Virtue Excuse: “There are worse things.”
- The Coercion Myth: “I have no choice!”
- The Revolutionary’s Excuse: “These are not ordinary times.”
- The Altruistic Switcheroo: “It’s for his own good”
- The Troublesome Luxury: “Ethics is a luxury we can’t afford right now”
- Victim Blindness, or “They/He/She/ You should have seen it coming.”
- The Maladroit’s Diversion, or “Nobody said it would be easy!”
- The Desperation Dodge or “I’ll do anything!”
- TheApathy Defense, or “Nobody Cares.”
- The Universal Trump, or “Think of the children!”
- The Golden Rule Mutation, or “I’m all right with it!”
- The Ironic Rationalization, or “It’s The Right Thing To Do”
The primary theory here, however, is “the ends justify the means.’
“This new legislation represents the toughest crackdown on child sex tourism by any government, anywhere,” Foreign Minister Julie Bishop said, while noting that Australia is “determined to prevent the sexual exploitation of vulnerable young children overseas.” The “crackdown” means that over 20,000 law-abiding Australian citizens will have their right to travel taken away because of what some of 400 travelers to Southeast Asia might have done.
This is pre-crime. The proposed law, and there is little chance that it won’t pass, punishes people who might commit a crime before they do, taking away the basic human right to go where they want to go because they have a particular history or characteristic in common with actual offenders. Maybe some child trafficking will be curtailed.
This end does not justify the means. The fact that the culture in Australia has come to believe it does should constitute a warning that human rights are not sufficiently safe there.