Comment Of The Day: “Megyn Kelly, William Saroyan, Ethics, Me, And Us: A Rueful Essay” (#2)

The second of the Comments of the Day sparked by my musings on Megyn Kelly’s descision to move from a job where she excelled to a completely different assignment at which, at least so far, she is crashing and burning like the Hindenburg. The first, by  Extradimensional Cephalopod, was very different, an abstract analysis of the phenomenon that bedevils Kelly, and many of us. The second, a personal account of the dilemma in action, is no less enlightening, but very different.

The comment also reminded me that I have never posted about the Japanese concept of Ikigai, and I should have. There is no English equivalent for the word: ikigai  combines the Japanese words ikiru, meaning “to live”, and kai, meaning “the realization of what one hopes for.” Together the words encompass the concept of “a reason to live” or the idea of having a purpose in life. Ikigai also invokes a mental and spiritual state where individuals feel that their lives have value—to them, to loved ones, to society.

Ikigai odes not spring from actions we are forced to take, but from natural, voluntary and spontaneous actions. In his article titled  “Ikigai — jibun no kanosei, kaikasaseru katei” (“Ikigai: the process of allowing the self’s possibilities to blossom”) Japanese wrter Kobayashi Tsukasa says that “people can feel real ikigai only when, on the basis of personal maturity, the satisfaction of various desires, love and happiness, encounters with others, and a sense of the value of life, they proceed toward self-realization.”

Sounds simple.

It isn’t.

Here is Alex’s Comment of the Day on the post, Megyn Kelly, William Saroyan, Ethics, Me, And Us: A Rueful Essay:

This topic is close to my heart, so time for some confessions and public reflections.

As I’ve previously mentioned I’m a software engineer, over a decade of experience, and modesty aside, a darned good one at what I do. The main areas of work I’ve been involved in are speech recognition, accessibility and development runtimes (think along the lines of the Java runtime). It was not necessarily world transforming work, but it had an impact and passionate following by our users. Pay was good if slightly low for the experience I had, and as of late I was getting tired of the work and wanted to try something new – also, a reasonable salary increase was not going to hurt.

So I start my job hunt, both internally and externally. At the end it comes down to two very good offers: One working for a social media giant with at a still-to-be-determined role with extremely good pay and no clear route for advancement. The other working closer to hardware (I’m an EE but never worked on it professionally) with lower pay (still an improvement over my previous job) at a clearly defined role with an advancement development plan and with the goal of putting people in space.

Putting it like this it sounds like a home run, but with a family in the line – I’m a single earner with three kids – the financial sides are a big consideration. There were so many things to balance: money, prospects for advancement, happiness, commute time, personal fulfillment, and yes, societal value of my work. It was not an easy decision, there were difficult conversations with my wife and even more than a year later some days I wonder if this was the right call (I went with the space company…Yay!)

Seeing what Kelly is going through, I could picture myself in that situation. What if, in my first three months here it turned out that I had forgotten everything I knew about hardware, or if I took the other job and the tedium made me underperform in a matter of months? What if I burned out at either job because of whatever reason in or out of my control? I chose what I thought best at the time, but there are no guarantees, and as good as things are there was a risk that they would go bad. Or that they could be even better had I chosen differently?

And then there is this:  better for whom? Me, my family, society? Am I overestimating the impact of my decision (maybe I’m more replaceable than I like to think)? At what point is the difference in an improvement (say financially) something that trumps other considerations? It is hard to make the right decisions, we just do our best (and thanks Jack, for keeping ethics in the forefront so they are part of the decision making process), and take the plunge. Things may go well, or they may not, but based on my experience I lean towards sympathy as my first response for someone failing after going for the more difficult choice.

12 Comments

Filed under Comment of the Day, Daily Life, Ethics Alarms Award Nominee, Family, Religion and Philosophy, Workplace

12 responses to “Comment Of The Day: “Megyn Kelly, William Saroyan, Ethics, Me, And Us: A Rueful Essay” (#2)

  1. Alex

    Ikigai. Now that’s a word I’m adding to my vocabulary.

    And thanks for the honor.

  2. Wayne

    My answer to this dilemma:

  3. Here is something that I learned from a very smart person many, many years ago…

    Step 1: Set your personal priorities.

    Step 2: Make choices that best achieve/maintain your personal priorities.

    Step 3: Be content that you made the right choices based on the information available at the time and remember that not choosing is also a choice.

    Step 4: Move on to the next choice.

    “Yesterday is a closed and permanently locked transparent door, I can see it through the door but I don’t live there anymore.”

    Life is all about choices; how you make them, what you learn from them, and how you choose to live with them. Past choices, even choices that you would now consider to be bad choices, make you the person you are right now, in this exact moment in time. Accept who you are and move on using the personal experiences that only you see through that closed and locked transparent door to guide you and be at peace.

  4. Alex,
    Certainly a comment worthy of Comment of the Day, it inspires personal reflection. 🙂

  5. Great comment and congrats!

  6. luckyesteeyoreman

    Alex: I second what Zoltar said above – your comment inspired personal reflection most helpfully. I share your sympathy for Megyn Kelly, and can relate well to your situation as you described it. Your closing sentence had me thinking, “I would be surprised if Jack did not make this a COTD.”

    • luckyesteeyoreman wrote, “Your closing sentence had me thinking, ‘I would be surprised if Jack did not make this a COTD.’ ”

      That’s interesting because that same closing sentence, “…I lean towards sympathy as my first response for someone failing after going for the more difficult choice” got me thinking about something else; what would the second response be and why would there be more than one response?

      Overall, I’m not sure that feelings of pity and sorrow for someone else’s misfortune due to their own personal choices, regardless if it’s difficult choices or not, is productive for anyone, I think it’s more along the lines of misapplied sympathy. Misfortunes due to choices are lessons and I won’t diminish those lessons with pity and sorrow. I reserve sympathy for uncontrollable misfortunes that are not the result of the person suffering consequences from their their own choices that resulted in the misfortune.

      I’ve never seen a Hallmark sympathy card that’s along the lines of, You’re suffering misfortunes due to making a difficult choice and you failed, my sympathy. 😉

      Isn’t “sympathy” one of those things that’s been misapplied so much for so long that it’s driven people to pass out participation trophies, and the like, and coddle children to the point that they’re so intellectually and socially immature that they now need trigger warnings and free speech safe zones. Misapplied sympathy taken to extremes has consequences.

  7. Pennagain

    Speaking as one who always went as wide (rather than as high) as possible in any position, even when you do have that job description in front of you and regardless of what the world, the profession or your spouse believes, you define your own success.

  8. Great comment, and great point illustrating why the ability to move on to other things (mobility) is just as important as the ability to put a great deal of effort into a single thing (intensity): there are no guarantees that it will work out. (Glad it seems to be, though!)

    Now all I need to achieve ikigai is for someone to pay me for my applied philosophical work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.