re: “ a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…” . this is gun control. by the
Founders. gun control except at times of war.
when writing on scotus decisions, do your credibility a favor and write like you know their decisions are almost always partisan and not based even in tradition. especially when scalia was involved.
Ok, I can tell a) you’re not a lawyer, and b) you can’t read. Nothing in those words suggest or imply a state of war. You’re hallucinating. “Security of a free state” refers to a whole universe of matters beside national defense.
The second half of your comment suggests you’ve never read a SCOTUS decision in your life, and are just aping ignorant talking points.
Ethics Alarms 
Lol – the chart itself needs to be listed in the red box. As far left as possible.
re: “ a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…” . this is gun control. by the
Founders. gun control except at times of war.
when writing on scotus decisions, do your credibility a favor and write like you know their decisions are almost always partisan and not based even in tradition. especially when scalia was involved.
Ok, I can tell a) you’re not a lawyer, and b) you can’t read. Nothing in those words suggest or imply a state of war. You’re hallucinating. “Security of a free state” refers to a whole universe of matters beside national defense.
The second half of your comment suggests you’ve never read a SCOTUS decision in your life, and are just aping ignorant talking points.