[Notice of a material correction: I have corrected this post, which incorrectly stated that the words of a letter approvingly quoted by Chuck Todd on “Meet the Press” were his own words. I won’t list all the sources that confused me on this point, but I primarily blame Newsbusters for a misleading headline, “Todd Bashes Christians in MTP Rant Against Misinformation, Trump.” Todd let a year-old letter to the Times do his ranting for him, which is a craven technique, but he did not himself “rant.” He just read a letter bashing religion as “fairy tales,” and used it in a manner that indicated that he agreed with it.
If I had been more careful reading this and similar accounts, this wouldn’t have happened. In the end, it’s my fault. However, my assessment of Todd’s intent is unchanged.
Thanks to Arthur in Maine for flagging my error.]
To be fair, it never was much of a mask anyway.
On “Meet the Press” today, host Chuck Todd apparently snapped, or perhaps let a letter snap for him. He dredged up a year-old letter to the Times that read,
“Why do good people support Trump? It’s because people have been trained from childhood to believe in fairy tales. This set their minds up to accept things that make them feel good. The more fairy tales and lies he tells the better they feel. Show me a person who believes in Noah’s ark, and I will show you a Trump voter.”
“Look, this gets at something,” Todd told his guest, the Times’ anti-Trump editor , Dean Baquet, “that my executive producer likes to say, voters want to be lied to sometimes. They don’t always love being told hard truths.”
Why in the world would Todd pick this faith-mocking letter to make that point? It’s a cowardly smear by proxy. He can advance the writer’s position, but if he’s criticized for it, he can always say “It wasn’t me, it was him!”
Todd and his colleagues never accept this excuse when someone they want to get retweets an inflammatory statement, though. This was exactly like a retweet….an endorsement.
You see, for all the abuse heaped on Hillary Clinton for her “deplorables” gaffe, calling anyone who supported Donald Trump over the virtuous and brilliant Hillary Clinton a racist, a fool, and an idiot, Democrats, the “resistance,” and journalists believed it then, and they believe it now. Chuck Todd adds the detail implied by the letter: if good people support President Trump—we know why the bad people support him—it’s because they were turned into idiots by religion! After all, the elite and educated know that religion is a crock, God is a crock, the Bible is a crock. Never mind all the “diversity” lip service. If you’re religious, you’re a dope, and you’re the problem. That’s what he thinks. That’s what most of them think.
How can anyone trust the likes of Chuck Todd (and he is the rule, not the exception) to report on President Trump, his policies, or the campaign, with that openly biased an attitude? They can’t. How can anyone trust the objectivity of a network that would continue to employ the host of its flagship public policy program who has stated, on the air, that no citizens who support the President are good people, except those whose brains have been addled by fairy tales and lies fed to them by religion.
How can anyone trust a journalist or a network so arrogant, unprofessional, and stupid?
Well, I suppose stupid people will, and people who don’t care if the news media is fair or professional, just whether the unethical reporters’ misconduct and bias advances their agendas.
Todd should be fired, as any on-air personality on any TV network would have been for tacitly backing such an a blanket attack on all religions just a few years ago. He’s not even good enough a broadcast journalist to claim the King’s Pass. Todd is the worst kind of mediocrity, a dull and petty mind in a position of influence he is grossly unqualified for, lacking the humility and self-awareness to recognize his limitations that are so obvious to everyone else.
And I find myself wondering: how many smoking gun, neon lit, flaming, sparking, damning statements from members of the Democratic/”resistance”/ mainstream media alliance will be made—there are hundreds of them already—before the vast majority of Americans, regardless of political affiliation, realize what they are dealing with, and how vile these people are?