Comment Of The Day: “Unethical Website Of The Month: Etsy”

Commenter Benjamin has a supple metaphorical pen, and this Comment of the Day, on the previous post regarding the open market platform Etsy selling facemasks as porous as cheesecloth is a blast. I’ll be back at the end to explain why it’s also a crock, but for the nonce, here is Benjamin’s Comment of the Day on the post, “Unethical Website Of The Month: Etsy”:

I oppose that modern compulsion to demand oversight of every man, woman, and child which blames every proximate business or municipality for every loophole it can find not as though a new opportunity has been found but as though this was malfeasance not to have thought to cover every possible route of escape. Etsy likely sees itself as a platform for individual sellers who found a way out of their over-managed corporate bureaucracies, not as an over-managing corporate employers of every seller on its platform. I applaud this model, knowing that other one from the inside with no realistic hope of escape. I could imagine an argument that Etsy must become this wretched, undesirable other thing which creeps throughout the world looking for life and happiness to strangle, but arguments from the presumption that it already is that thing are arguments from an untrue premise.

I, rather, should hope that this model becomes the norm, and that every detestable megacorp, losing the benefit of its lobbied-for oversight laws to maintain their bloated, inefficient dominance, files for bankruptcy, freeing us from the chains of a socialism-via-capitalism subversive commercial-governmental conspiracy.

And consider that Etsy is expected to police standards in masks which aren’t detailed in any of the mask mandates! When (not ‘if’) the governments demands simply that we wear “orange” to minimize pedestrian deaths, will Etsy be forced to police particular shades which aren’t ironed out in the law? No, I disagree with this at every level.

I’m back. The problem with this characteristic libertarian take is that it applies absolutism to an issue that society has correctly determined is subject to the maxim, “Enough is enough.” “Let the buyer beware” has its virtues, but within limits: before the government got into the business of regulating safety, drugs and food. In the days of patent medicines, gullible people were routinely killed or crippled by “elixers” that supposedly cured everything from warts to paralysis. Much later, chiropractors gulled desperate cancer victim into paying to have their tumors shrunk by massages.

It’s easy enough, as another commenter on the same post argued, to shrug off the fate of someone dumb enough to buy and wear a facemask that has visible holes in it during a pandemic , but with a minimum of thought it should be obvious that even to those enthralled by the siren call of libertarianism, this has to be an exception to “let the buyer beware.” There are a lot of fools and idiots out there, and as long as their stupidity only harms themselves, I agree that they should be permitted to blunder through life with minimal oversight. However, a pandemic is a special case. An idiot wearing a fashionable mask that does nothing to protect anyone risks actively spreading the contagion, and spreading the contagion  a) can kill other, innocent, smarter people and b) extends the crisis, which has all sorts of negative effects unrelated to health.

To a degree, Benjamin’s argument is a straw man. Yes, it is unreasonable to expect a site like Etsy to “police” every product sold on its platform…but I’m not arguing for that. These are obviously porous facemasks being negligently and irresponsibly sold to jerks and idiots who are endangering  the public. It’s not excessively burdensome to say “No.”

3 thoughts on “Comment Of The Day: “Unethical Website Of The Month: Etsy”

  1. Some stores have responded to the ‘holey’ masks with signs listing the kindsof masks that won’t be allowed in the store.

    • Stores with signs requesting masks are functionally stores with signs reading “Benjamin’s patronage is not desired”. I will begin accepting terms of surrender only after a defeat.

  2. Local activism has diminished my free time. I think I’ll only make a short reply. Let’s see if I succeed!

    The drastic shift in American law and jurisprudence from declaring particular acts illegal to delocalizing blame onto corporate bodies as a way of deputizing private citizens and doing an end-run around the constitution is something I can only oppose. If the actions of a man selling poisons on the internet aren’t the fault of the man selling poisons but of the internet for not properly subjecting all sales to their now-mandatory quality control department as a result of the law, then the social contract is void. We’ve all been subjected to a maternalistic collective promise to keep every individual safe by preventing the possibility of wrongdoing at the cost of constant, burdensome surveillance and micro-management.

    I’m no economist, but I suspect the change in ratio of productive to nonproductive labor in the last seventy years is directly related to the current crisis of property ownership. We pay too many people to do too few valuable tasks. But these are just the irrelevant practical effects. I think leaving this in the realm of the utilitarian would do me more good than harm, though, so that dovetails nicely into my original goal.

    Only two subject related paragraphs. That’s modern efficiency. Hopefully I didn’t truncate any necessary ideas. I suppose that would also be in keeping with modern efficiency.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.