My Mentor, My Friend: David J. McCarthy, 1935-2020

Dave McCarthy

I have many things I want to write about, but this is something I have to write about.

I learned recently that my friend, mentor, teacher and my first boss David J. McCarthy, Jr. died on October 1, at the age of 84.  The key word here is probably mentor, but I’m not certain I have the perfect word for David. What do you call the person who probably did as much to influence the course of your life, all positively, than anyone else other than your parents? That was him. I know: I understand the real meaning of “The Road Not Taken.” It’s possible, even likely, that I would have ended up in the same place, or close to it, without someone pointing me to a path I had never considered at a point when I was desperately looking for options. But if a butterfly flapping its wings in the Amazon can cause a hurricane in Milwaukee, David McCarthy was the pterodactyl flapping his wings who changed, literally, everything in my life.

David McCarthy was my first year torts professor at Georgetown University Law Center, and my favorite prof in the classroom; he was witty, theatrical, quick and demanding. Unlike a couple of other professors, he did not know me well, and yet when he was appointed the new Dean of GULC in 1975, the year I graduated, he offered me the job as the first Director of Development in the law school’s history.

I was known to him, and everyone at the school, as the weird student who had devoted his law school years to founding a theater company and directing its productions, leading to a very mediocre academic record but a lot of gratitude from the law school community. Incredibly, the school had never had its own capital giving program directed at raising money from law school alumni, and it had a lot of famous and wealthy ones. Dean McCarthy, faced with opposition from the main campus to his plan of hiring a recent grad and a lawyer for the task rather than a professional fundraiser, explained that first, only a fellow Georgetown lawyer could credibly approach other Georgetown lawyers, and second, as he told me, “Anyone who can convince law students to devote so much time to rehearsing Gilbert and Sullivan shows can talk anyone into anything.”

I thought I had left Washington, D.C. forever for my beloved Boston, but an expected job had fallen through, and David’s crazy idea sounded intriguing. (Naturally, my risk-loving father advised me to take it.) I did, and never got back to Boston except on business trips and holiday, I met my wife here; I started my theater company here; all of the jobs, friends, associates and adventures that led me to ethics as a career were here.

Dean McCarthy and I got to know each other well: I traveled with him, shared hotel rooms with him, had after-work discussions with him, and was invited to his home, where I sang while he played the piano. I even directed him in a show (a memorable cameo as “Bunthorne’s Solicitor”) in “Patience,” in 1976. Most of all, I learned from him and laughed with him; Dave was a natural comedian. He supported me in various scrapes with Georgetown U., and once gave me a speech that I repeated almost word for word to my son Grant decades later.

“You force people to take you as you are,” he said, “and you don’t want to lose that. But you will always pay a price, and sometimes it will be a steep one. It is usually easier succeeding if you conform and follow the crowd, but if you have the guts to go your own way and the character to know right from wrong, you’ll ultimately end up where you belong.”

 After seven years, David found my next career step, persuading his neighbor, US Chamber exec Tom Donohue, to hire me to run his policy research foundation.

David and I were only occasionally in contact after that, but when he stepped down as Dean and retired, I was one of those honored with an invitation to his retirement dinner. I honestly don’t know that I ever told David how grateful I was for everything he had done for me. I don’t think so. I am heartened by the knowledge that David was uncommonly perceptive, and brilliant as well. I’m sure he knew.

Thanks, Dave. For everything.

And I’m not exaggerating.

You can read about David J. McCarthy here.

14 thoughts on “My Mentor, My Friend: David J. McCarthy, 1935-2020

  1. Awww … I loved him and his whacky voice. I still can hear him in my head saying, “ferae naturae!” I had him for property. His style scared me shitless, but I always was prepared for class! Also, I totally aced the rule against perpetuities questions on the Bar.

    • I think Torts fit into McCarthy’s rich sense of humor and the absurd more than the other topics he taught, like Property and Local Government Law. Torts are just funnier by nature. On the other hand, a teacher like him is what you pray for when you’re in a class on a less than scintillating topic…like, as I am constantly told, ethics.

      • I agree with your view of torts. Decades later, some choice bits still float around in my head. Example: “the exceedingly nervous disposition of the mink,” in the case where the mommy minks on the mink farm ate their babies in response to (I think) loud noises and vibrations from blasting at a nearby quarry.

          • “In Foster v. Preston Mill Co., 44 Wash. 2d 440, 268 P.2d 645 (1954), the defendant was constructing a logging road along the side of Rattlesnake Ledge, which was approximately two and one quarter miles from the plaintiff’s mink ranch. Although the plaintiff’s mink ranch was in a relatively rural area, it was about two blocks from U.S. Highway No. 10, which was a main east-west thoroughfare across the state.

            It was necessary to use explosives to build the logging road. The defendant used the customary types of explosives, as well as the customary methods of blasting. The procedure was to set off two blasts a day, once at noon and the other at the end of the workday. The defendant’s expert, Professor Drury Augustus Pfeiffer of the University of Washington, later testified that a highly sensitive pin seismometer yielded no measured ground movement from blasts the same size that the defendant had made, at a distance equal to that separating the defendant’s construction area from the plaintiff’s mink ranch.
            Minks are notoriously sensitive animals, and the defendant’s blasts began just as the plaintiff’s mother minks were beginning to bear their young. The mother minks began to eat their young. Immediately after the blasts started, the mink mothers killed 35 of their kittens. The plaintiff’s manager then told the defendant’s manager what had happened. He did not request that the blasting be stopped. After some discussion, however, the defendant’s manager said that future blasts would be made as light as possible. The amount of explosives used in a normal shot was then reduced from 19 or 20 sticks to 14 sticks. The carnage continued.

            The defendant’s officers testified that it would have been impractical to cease entirely road-building during the several weeks required for the minks to whelp and wean their young. Such a delay would have made it necessary to run the logging operation another season. It would also have disrupted the company’s log production schedule and consequently the operation of its lumber mill. The plaintiff brought suit, and the trial took place before a court sitting without a jury; it was thus a “bench trial.” The trial court found for the plaintiff, holding that the defendant was strictly liable for the deaths of all minks killed after the conversation between the plaintiff and the defendant’s manager.”

            • See, that “classic” case only reminds me of the solid D grades I got in the two law classes I took. How in the name of Kamala Harris telling the truth did the facts of that case prove that the blasting caused the mother minks to eat the baby minks?

              • It’s a dubious case for many reasons, but a fun one to set up the dichotomy between direct consequences and predictable consequences. Assuming arguendo that minks do eat their young under stress, either you accept strict liability for all direct negative consequences of a dangerous activity, however unforeseen, or you draw the line at bad results that could have been “reasonably” predicted.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.