1. President Trump says will veto the so-called “stimulus bill.” He should. A nice, articulate Presidential veto statement about what’s wrong with a pork-loaded goody bag that will increase the National Debt even deeper into the red zone would be nice, but he hasn’t come up with more than a couple a nice, articulate statements in four years, so I rate the likelihood as slim.
But there is no downside at all of a Trump veto, even if Mitch McConnell gets the Senate to over-ride it. As Ethics Alarms commenter Humble Talent pointed out two days ago, the thing is a monstrosity and wildly irresponsible, never mind that virtually none of the elected representatives who voted for it knew what they were voting for.
Meanwhile, let’s give an Ethics Hero call-out to Rand Paul, who anyone could have predicted would have a head explosion over this bill, and he did not disappoint. Senator Paul excoriated his fellow Republican senators who voted for the multitrillion-dollar relief package and omnibus spending bills, saying that they abandoned their “soul” and their “fiscal integrity” for political expediency. Paul called the bill an example of the fantasy that “government can spend whatever it wants without the need to tax.” How can anyone seriously dispute his logic when he said,
“If free money was the answer … if money really did grow on trees, why not give more free money? Why not give it out all the time? Why stop at $600 a person? Why not $1,000? Why not $2,000? Maybe these new Free-Money Republicans should join the Everybody-Gets-A-Guaranteed-Income Caucus? Why not $20,000 a year for everybody, why not $30,000? If we can print out money with impunity, why not do it?”
In addition to Paul, only Republicans Rick Scott (FL), Marsha Blackburn (TN), Mike Lee (UT), Ron Johnson (WI) and Ted Cruz (TX) had the courage and integrity to vote “NO.”
Yahoo News, incidentally, really and truly has a story up titled, “Did Congress get it right with the new coronavirus stimulus?” It really does. Note that it doesn’t begin to cover all the junk that’s stuffed in the bill, because the reporter obviously hasn’t read the whole bill either.
2. Speaking of the Senate and “believe all women”/ “believe all victims”/ “believe all female victims who accuse Republicans” or whatever the current approved slogan is, the ex-wife of Georgia Democratic Senate candidate Raphael Warnock accused him of running over her foot with his car as she tried to stop him from driving off with their kids last March. In body cam video, Ouleye Warnock is seen telling a responding officer,
OULEYE: This man is running for the United States Senate, and all he cares about right now is his reputation. I work at the mayor’s office, and this is a big problem.
UNIDENTIFIED OFFICER: Okay.
OULEYE: I’ve been trying to be very quiet about the way he is for the sake of my kids and his reputation. …I’ve tried to keep the way that he acts under wraps for a long time, and today he crossed the line. So, that is what is going on here. And he’s a great actor. He is phenomenal at putting on a really good show.
Of course, in the mainstream media doesn’t cover the incident, it will be the proverbial pre-election tree falling in the forest…
3. Who can you trust? You may have seen those ads for Robinhood, a fast-growing financial app (take from the rich, give to the poor, get it?), claiming it makes stock investing fun and free. Last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission said that Robinhood had misled its customers about how it was paid by Wall Street firms for passing along customer trades and that the start-up had made money at the expense of its unsophisticated customers. Robinhood agreed to pay a $65 million fine to settle the charges, without admitting or denying guilt.
4. Now THIS was the epitome of making an example of someone. My WWII vet father greatly admired General Eisenhower and detested deserters, but he explained in great detail why Private Eddie Slovik, whose execution by firing squad was approved by Ike on this day in 1944 was unjust.
Slovik was a draftee who was originally classified 4-F because of a conviction for grand theft auto. In January 1944 he was trained to be a rifleman, though he said he hated guns. Slovik was shipped to France among replacement troops to bolster the 28th Infantry Division, as he and a companion were on the way to the front lines, he claimed, they became lost and stumbled upon a Canadian unit that took them in.
Slovik stayed with the Canadians unttil they turned him over to the American military police two months later. No charges were brought, but a day after Slovik returned to his unit he claimed he was “too scared and too nervous” and threatened to run away if forced into combat.
But he was ordered to fight, so as promied, he desserted. The next day he returned and signed a confession, again claiming he would run away again if forced to fight. An officer of the 28th advised Slovik to take the confession back, but Slovik refused. He was confined to the stockade.
A legal officer then told Slovik that if he went into combat immediately he would avoid a court-martial. Slovik refused. Tried on November 11, 1944 for desertion, he was convicted in less than two hours and sentenced by nine-officer court martial panel “to be shot to death with musketry.”
Slovik’s appeals were rejected. His final appeal was to Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander while the American army (including my father) was fighting the Battle of the Bulge and suffering thosands of casualt thousands casualties. Eisenhower upheld the sentence. Private Eddie Slovik was shot to death by a firing squad in eastern France in January of 1945, becoming the first U.S. Army soldier since the Civil War to die for desertion, and the only soldier executed for desertion during World War II.