“All They Have To Do Is Not Be Crazy, And They Can’t Even Do That” Observations

The quote in the title, in various forms, has been repeated as a running gag on Instapundit, the conservative mega-blog, for four years now. The idea behind it was that in light of the chaotic and intentionally obnoxious style of the President, Democrats only needed to behave in a statesmanlike, responsible, fair and judicious manner to prevail politically. Instead, they did exactly the opposite.

The problem is that acting crazy worked. The increasingly radical leftist base wanted to rain anger and hate down on President Trump while trying every avenue to remove him without having to brave an election. After originally resisting, the Democratic leadership eventually capitulated, bolstered by now completely partisan news media and the Republican NeverTrumpers, whose hatred of the President was as much driven by class as politics. Now that Democrats have won control of the Senate as well as the White House, they apparently see no reason to stop the formula that succeeded so well—at the cost of dividing the nation, risking violence, destroying trust in our institutions, and cementing a new normal of endless political warfare, but still. This has become the party of “the ends justifies the means.”

Of course, staying this course is also crazy, as well as destructive and dangerous. Perhaps they do not know how to get off the rails of the 2016 Election Ethics Train Wreck they started, nurtured and fueled. I agree, it’s a difficult task. The apparent Biden strategy of offering a plastic olive branch to the 50% of the public his party has insulted and denigrated for all this time and saying, “Ok, now we should be nice and respectful to each other, and shame on you if you aren’t” will not work; I can figure that out by just reading Ethics Alarms comments.

But what really won’t work is acting even crazier, which today involves seeking to crush President Trump even though he has been defeated, embarrassed (mostly by his own words and actions) and will be leaving office in a few weeks. It is crazy, for example, with his term almost over, for Democrats and other members of the Axis of Unethical Conduct to highlight their own hypocrisy and double standards by talking as if their own leaders and allies didn’t encourage, cheer on and excuse the nation-wide violence by Back Lives Matter protesters and rioters this summer and fall.

President Trump encouraged his die-hard followers to protest the election results. He was, indeed, playing with fire, knowing what some of his followers were like. But the party pretending that it has never seen such conduct is the party of a mayor, in the city where Trump’s supporters gathered, who directed that “Black Lives Matter” be painted in huge block letters on her city’s streets while that group’s insurrectionists were breaking laws, burning property, looting and intimidating citizens around the nation. It is also the party whose Speaker of the House called for “uprisings all over the country” in response to the administration’s illegal immigration policies. Merriam-Webster defines “uprising”  as “a usually localized act of popular violence in defiance usually of an established government.”

Even with the assistance of a subservient news media that will scrupulously avoid pointing out the double standard, those now being demonized know what’s going on, as will some members of the Democratic party with integrity and perspective—there have to be some. The outraged rhetoric is crazy.

Crazier still is the effort to impeach or remove President Trump using an unconstitutional interpretation of the 25th Amendment. This can only be explained by pure hate and the urge for revenge, as Democrats who failed in one coup attempt and theory after another show they are determined to get their prize even when it 1) makes no sense and 2) will exacerbate the divisions in the nation, which are already at a dangerous level.

Ann Althouse’s reaction this morning nicely demonstrates the craziness:

I’d like the Democrats — who have won — to show calm steadiness and grace, not crank things up to higher and higher hysteria! What was the point of dragging old man Biden to the fore and using him — rather than Sanders or Warren — to defeat Trump if not to rope in those of us who just want things to be sensible, moderate, and practical?!

Reading that, I found my mind slightly paraphrasing the sentiments of Sir Thomas More’s cynical servant, Matthew: ” [And I’d like us to] have good luck all the time. I wish rainwater was beer! I wish we had wings! But we don’t.”

Ann has also pointed out that Joe Biden’s conduct right now seems at odds with his promise last week:

“Here’s my promise to you: I’ll be a president for all Americans. Whether you voted for me or not, I’ll wake up every single morning and work to make your life better.”

She writes,

“Biden won the election because people wanted calm, moderation, and normality. But it’s not enough that he may be a calm, moderate, normal person. He must lead. Where is he now? Can he show his supporters how to gracefully accede to power? Can he unite us? I want an aura of beneficence, dignity, and inclusion!”

Oh Matthew! Matthew? Please give your speech to Ann again, will you?

On a related note, Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have written a thorough examination of the legitimacy, legally and constitutionally, of trying to impeach Trump based in an incitement to riot theory. Read it, but not to hold you in unnecessary suspense, they conclude that the theory is really, really weak.

They also point out that nothing stops Congress from impeaching a President after he leaves office. It would be crazy for Democrats to try to do that, which means that I wouldn’t put it past them. This is a party consumed with hate, and unless a strong and principled leader within the party works to bring it back into the realm of responsibility and national interest, I don’t see the craziness ending any time soon.

21 thoughts on ““All They Have To Do Is Not Be Crazy, And They Can’t Even Do That” Observations

  1. Several strategists have pointed out that impeaching Trump, successfully, would take him entirely out of the equation for 2024, as well as the very soon midterm elections. I’m not so sure that’s the case.

      • I didn’t say they were GOOD strategists. Seriously, I fail to see how this would remove any Trump influence on future elections. To his base, and many others, it would simply be viewed as more of the same. For the media, it would allow them to spend a month or so saying “unprecedented!” and actually be correct for a change. Get ready for the Bull Moose Party 2024.

    • I’ve heard that thought expressed. However, impeachment alone won’t do it. They have to convict him in the Senate as well, then I believe he would be ineligible to hold office (although I haven’t actually checked that section of the constitution).

      In the first place, it occurs to me that, regardless of when the new Senators from Georgia are seated, the Republicans — Mitch McConnell — will control the Senate until Pence leaves office. Harris cannot be the tie-breaking vote until she is actually Vice President. So I cannot see anything happening in the Senate before Trump leaves.

      Second, do we seriously think 67 senators, even now, are going to vote to convict Trump? Any Republicans (other than the usual couple suspects) who do so might as well announce their retirement at the same time. They’ll be gone after the next election.

  2. “”Merriam-Webster defines “uprising” as “a usually localized act of popular violence in defiance usually of an established government.””

    For now.

  3. I pray you’re wrong but I fear you are right. Why would the craziness stop when it has worked so well in the Democrat’s favor? At 70years of age, I am astounded at the outright wickedness I see out of those who are suppose to be the people’s representatives. Does that mean their supporters are that wicked as well since they condone their hate and hypocrisy? Trump is many bad things but I don’t see him as evil. Big ego, yes. Speaks without thinking, yes, A bully at times, yes. Says things that are offensive to others, yes. But I don’t see the evil there in that he wants to totally destroy his enemies and anyone who supports them.

  4. I think the AUC is addicted to anti-Trumpism. I don’t think they’re capable of changing course. I think they’re going to overplay their hand.

      • It actually seems to me quite likely that things will play out as usual after inauguration–that after a year or so of overreach, midterms will block further ambitious legislative and executive plans. The Democrats, if they were wise, would use something more likely to be bulletproof to a right-wing narrative–DC/Puerto Rican statehood, for instance. But “The Democrats, if they were wise” is already hilarious.

        Republicans, meanwhile, would do well to get their act together. Trump’s populism has allowed them to coast on soft language that appeased both bonafide conservatives and the more fringe players the party’s attracted over the past forty years or so, which has led directly to the events of this week, as “mail in ballots were not a good idea” melded with “a ring of pedophiles has stolen the election.” It couldn’t hold, of course, which is why people like Ted Cruz are now dancing as hard as they can.

        It’s an interesting time, but it’s not unprecedented and it’s certainly not apocalyptic.

  5. Deeply depressing. Knowing when you’ve won and when to turn magnanimous is a crucial tactical skill. Trump has made a colossal error. Attempting to totally humiliate and destroy him will just make him a martyr…. and then he and his inevitable successors will be really dangerous.

    • I doubt he can be martyred in any new way. His loyalists already find him hopelessly maligned, and no one else is interested. But failing twice at removing a President from office is not a good look on a political party.

      • Let’s say lightning strikes and Trump is impeached with a week to go.

        President Pence will absolutely give him an absolute pardon. Then the Democrats will have egg on their faces when they have to “condemn” their supporters for rioting. I expect they would use the same cutesy language that the just impeached the president for.

        I guess Biden was on to something with that virtual inauguration….

  6. To paraphrase Churchill (while it is still possible to do so without being cancelled):
    “Democrats ride to and fro upon tigers from which they dare not dismount.” Sadly there has been no significant comeuppance for the last several years of Democratic party politics, and every possible power reward for the last 4 in particular. All this was the tiger they rode in on, they see no peril in continuing the ride.

    If not miraculously moderated by Old School Joe, we are about to experience the id of the Democratic Party unleashed and unchecked. We will know soon whether President Biden will ride, or have a (Theodore) Rooseveltian instinct in him to instead grab the tiger by the tail and hold fast against his party’s worst impulses. Biden can choose to be figurehead or statesman. I so fear the former, but desperately hope for the latter.

    • jwest877 said
      “Democrats ride to and fro upon tigers from which they dare not dismount.” Sadly there has been no significant comeuppance for the last several years of Democratic party politics, and every possible power reward for the last 4 in particular. All this was the tiger they rode in on, they see no peril in continuing the ride.

      I think this is a great paraphrase, completely apropos to the moment.

      Keep in mind that the media is similarly mounted, so they will have to defend the Democrats lest their own mounts turn and rend them. The question is, will the people of this country collectively continue to allow it? At what point will they demand an accounting to the Constitution?

      I have seen in my life many cases where groups of supposedly intelligent Americans have followed some psycho off a metaphorical cliff, to their deaths or ruination. Is it actually possible this whole country would do that?

      I choose to believe it would not, but I confess I may be living in hope…

Leave a Reply to Joe Fowler Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.