Let’s Play The Game Everyone Is Talking About: “Idiot Or Con Artist!” Today’s Contestant: Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)

I’m not going to play out the entire TV game show trope, but you get the idea. That was the first thing that jumped into my head when I read the astounding AOC tweet above from yesterday, that would have justified many other standard Ethics Alarms categories: Unqualified Elected Official, Ethics Dunce, Unethical Tweet, Unethical Quote, or just KABOOM!, since it is head-exploding that a Democratic lawmaker would either have such an infantile understanding of corporate law or, in the alternative, deliberately try to confuse the generally ignorant public with such per se misinformation.

I will point out now, as a tangential matter, that Twitter hasn’t removed the tweet nor suspended AOC’s account, though her statement is straight-up false, and a more consequential and undeniable falsehood than most of those resulting in the platform’s removing commenting privileges from others.

Fact: Neither the Republican Party nor any lawyer, judge or non-ignoramous “believes corporations are people.” OAC’s outrageous framing on an important legal doctrine has become popular on the Left, from demagoguing politicians to propagandizing comics like Stephen Colbert ever since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010, which confirmed that the rights of free speech applied to associations of people as well as people themselves.The real issue is “corporate personhood,” a concept accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court, the government and the legal system at least since the 1886 Supreme Court case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.

Legal scholars have pointed out, correctly, that the statement in the opinion asserting that corporations were due most of the the same rights as people under the Fourteenth Amendment was dicta (a general statement that was not at issue and thus not the equivalent of precedent), but this is one of many examples in legal history of a principle seeping into law, tradition and society because it was unavoidable. There is still no claim in that SCOTUS opinion nor any other that “corporations are people.” That is an absurd interpretation of the real doctrine.

If legal associations of people don’t have the rights of the people in those organizations, then corporations couldn’t sign contracts. Giving corporations  legal rights allows corporations to sue and to be sued, makes taxation and regulation more direct and simple as well as facilitating  other complex transactions that would otherwise involve, in the case of large corporations, thousands of people. It protects the individual rights of shareholders. Without Bill of Rights protection for corporations, the government could seize their properties on a whim, or dissolve companies it didn’t like. Companies and organizations would not be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment; churches and religious organizations could be made to act in direct violations of their foundational beliefs. The government could tax entities it found annoying at destructive rates. This really isn’t hard. A free society doesn’t work if corporations and associations don’t have Equal Protection, Freedom of Association, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, and many other Constitutional Rights the Founders designated for individuals.

Most of the controversy over corporate personhood has come from critics on both the liberal and conservative ends of the ideological spectrum who have objected to sloppy way the Court came to adopt it. Dissent­ing in Wheel­ing Steel Corp. in 1949, mainstay Court liberals Justice William O. Douglas and Justice Hugo Black complained,

“[In Santa Clara] [t]here was no history, logic, or reason given to support that view. … [T]he purpose of the [14th] Amend­ment was to protect human rights-primar­ily the rights of a race which had just won its free­dom.”

 Douglas and Black argued that the ques­tion of corpor­ate person­hood should be decided by the people, not the Supreme Court, a frightening prospect when elected fools like AOC would be guiding them. In the 1970s, it was an arch conservative on the Court, Justice William Rehnquist, who in a dissent, ques­tioned extend­ing corpor­a­tions polit­ical rights, writing, “those prop­er­ties, so bene­fi­cial in the economic sphere, pose special dangers in the polit­ical sphere.”  Stating, as Rep. Ocasio-Cortez does, that support for corporate personhood (which is what she would have tweeted if she weren’t either ignorant or lying) is a partisan belief is as false as the rest of her tweet. Incredibly, she made this stupid statement while Democrats are cheering the Disney corporation’s public opposition to Florida’s Parental Rights Bill, and accusing Florida Gov. DeSantis of threatening Disney’s rights by raising the possibility of removing the company’s favored status in the state.

When individual rights can’t and shouldn’t be extended to organizations, the Court has declined to do it. For example, the Supreme Court doesn’t recognize a Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for a corporation. Corporations and organizations do not have privacy rights under the Privacy Act of 1974, because the statute refers to any “individual,”  “a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.”

And so we return to the metaphorical TV game show, “Idiot Or Con Artist!” Is AOC truly this ignorant? If so, it is one more example of a serious problem in our republic: we have officials advocating, debating and making laws who don’t understand what our current laws are or mean. This is an indictment against our civic literacy, our education system, our culture, our information media, Congress and our system of government itself. A law degree can’t be a requirement for a citizen to be an elected representative, but there is still an duty to possess the knowledge essential to doing any job competently. If a member of Congress really thinks that our laws hold that “corporations are people,” that member’s positions on any issue are suspect.

In the alternative, if Ocasio-Cortez knows her characterization is false, and nonetheless poisoned the public’s comprehension of the law by tweeting it—note that it had 48,000 “likes”—then she, like so much of her party and the news media that advances its interests, is deliberately making the public more confused and misinformed than it already is—all the better to dominate them and take away their rights and interests.

Either way, she is a disgrace, and an ethics villain.

9 thoughts on “Let’s Play The Game Everyone Is Talking About: “Idiot Or Con Artist!” Today’s Contestant: Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)

  1. Very well-articulated explanation of things I have had to try to explain numerous times.

    Two points to add: no one advocates for a corporation’s right to vote (of course, that is just more right-wing voter suppression). Also, corporations have rights under the Bill of Rights because the Bill of rights (in large part) is a list of things the government has no right to do.

    That second one particularly bothers me when those on the right (usually they are on the right) say that illegal immigrants (or some other non-citizen group) don’t have rights under the Constitution (or something to that effect). YES! They do! Because the Bill of Rights does. Or provide an exception for illegal immigrants. The government does not get to violate their rights just because they are not a citizen.

    My verdict: I think she is an idiot. I don’t think she spends much time thinking about what she thinks. She probably has never had to.

    -Jut

  2. I think its funny that a party that derided the idea that corporations had rights have no problem with corporations using those rights to punish states for the laws they pass and individuals for what they say or do off the clock.

  3. Thanks for this, it’s something I never actually thought about. Where I am there’s mostly small businesses so the people and business dynamic is definitely blurred.
    AOC keeps saying dumb things. Twitter is the worst of the social media for discourse of any kind it’s not surprising she has the most followers there, in the biggest echo chamber of them all.

  4. This post gives me the opportunity to bring up one of my hobby horses: the annoying Progressive Insurance television commercial campaign featuring that smarmy pseudo therapist who makes his living counseling thirty and forty-somethings on how not to become their parents. Personally, I’m still waiting for my forty-something children to become their parents instead of being unthinking, knee-jerk lefties much like AOC. And yes, AOC’s a commie, as is Bernie Sanders. What happened to these younger generations? When are they ever going to grow up and stop treating their government as nothing more than a fountain of endless largesse? This quote of AOC’s is unremarkable compared to her asserting that there’s no limit to what the government can agree to do because all the government has to do is print more money. And this is a person with an alleged economics degree from Boston University. Anyway, whenever I see that asshole on those Progressive commercials, I want to say, “Fuck you, buddy.”

  5. Ocasio-Cortez knows that corporate entities do not enjoy personhood. She knows it full well and is simply saying things she thinks her supporters and constituents want to hear. In her mind, corporate entities are subject to government regulation. Look at her Green New Deal: it is government confiscation of private property.

    jvb

    • By “do not enjoy” you mean “don’t have,” right?

      I think you give her too much credit on this one. As she has shown before, her legal comprehension is that of the relatively alert cocker spaniel.

  6. She won the Lifetime Idiot Award when she chased Amazon out of town, being unable to distinguish revenue from spending. I’m certain that people tried to explain how enticing a major employer to set up shop would ultimately generate more tax revenue. Her mind is impenetrable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.