Evening Ethics Excitement, 8/2/2022: Stop Making Me Defend Nancy Pelosi, And Other Annoyances

1. Stop making me defend Nancy Pelosi! Many pundits on the left, notably the notoriously pro-China New York Times veteran Tom Friedman, declared that Speaker Pelosi, currently on an Asian tour, should heed China’s warnings and not visit Taiwan. Friedman’s column, headlined “Why Pelosi’s Visit to Taiwan Is Utterly Reckless,” argued,

“Nothing good will come of it. Taiwan will not be more secure or more prosperous as a result of this purely symbolic visit, and a lot of bad things could happen. These include a Chinese military response that could result in the U.S. being plunged into indirect conflicts with a nuclear-armed Russia and a nuclear-armed China at the same time.”

The Biden administration, as usual, has been sending mixed and incoherent messages. Not Pelosi. She not only is visiting Taiwan, she is reaffirming what the Biden administration has been hesitating to state straight out. “Our visit reiterates that America stands with Taiwan: a robust, vibrant democracy and our important partner in the Indo-Pacific,” Pelosi said on Twitter. What her visit says is just as unequivocal: the United States of America doesn’t take orders from Chairman Xi, or any foreign despot. If there was any question whether Pelosi should land in Taiwan, it should have evaporated the second China started saber-rattling. And mirabile dictu, it did!

Pelosi’s actions say, “Bite me!”


2. Never trust anyone in a rat suit, and other life lessons. I had decided not to discuss the story about the African-American mother who has accused Chuck E. Cheese of racism because one of the costumed characters appeared to snub her little girl while interacting with the white children nearby. It amazes me that theme parks and places like Chuck E. Cheese trust the low level, minimum wage employees who agree to suffer in those horrible animal costumes, and, on the other side of the ledger, that parents expect anything but inadequate customer service from poorly trained, immature hires who would agree to perform such a humiliating job. Steve-O-in-NJ, however made these provocative observations as he sent me the link:

Is it just me, or is stuff like this setting a REALLY bad precedent for entertainment venues that rely at least partially on costumed characters interacting with children? Does this mean that every time a character in a costume with limited visibility misses a handshake, or characters have to leave before the last couple of kids are tended to either because their time is up or they have a genuine issue (it gets potentially dangerously hot in those costumes) it’s going to become a basis for a race-based complaint? A two-year-old isn’t even going to remember what happened in an incident like this. I’d hate to think that eventually this is going to result in the end of these kind of experiences because one too many relatively harmless mistakes offended one too many of the wrong kind of people.

Full disclosure, I’m still annoyed, 20 years later, at PBS station WLIW and promoter Princeton Entertainment for a botched meet-and-greet experience during a Christmas tour, in which one of the performers simply refused to show and those of us who paid a good price were simply herded out past the others with a dismissive “no photos, no autographs.” I didn’t take it lying down and I think one representative’s ears are still scarred from the chewing out she got from me (you know what I’m like when I get angry). The fact that WLIW has not failed since (although meet and greets are only slowly returning after COVID) doesn’t erase that bad impression.

I’m amazed the demise of these costume characters hasn’t occurred already. Yes, it would be a loss: I’ve seen the look on kids’ faces when a giant Mickey or Donald Duck hugs them. I also saw the infamous video in which a mean kid kicks Pluto in the shin, and the big dog chases the screaming child with mayhem on his mind…

3. Who says baseball doesn’t have a heart? The Boston Red Sox today surprised me by making a completely illogical decision that was bad business and bad management, but that would make most fans happy. This is the trade deadline, and ever since free agency, teams that are out of contention for the post-season trade away their looming free agents and older veterans to the play-off bound teams, who pay dearly in talented prospects for such “rentals.” The Red Sox have had a star-crossed season, streaky, a lot of fluke losses, and a wave of injuries to key players. They are stuck at .500, and based on the horrible month just passed, no sure thing to end the season even that well. But they are only a few games behind in the play-off slot race, and fans do not like to see their team wave a white flag with two months left in the season. And so it is that head of baseball operations Chaim Bloom, instead of making the smart, practical move of using today to trade off players the team will like lose to free agency anyway, chose to trade to strengthen the team instead, and to still try to win against tough odds. The players are happy; the fans are happy. I think it’s a mistake strategically, but ethically, it was the right thing to do.

4. Words Have Consequences Dept.The View has been in the new a lot recently, primarily because it is rapidly reaching peak stupid. The show recently invited Florida governor Ron DeSantis to be a guest on the show, saying that the ladies would be “honored” if he would accept. DeSantis’s office replied,

Do ethics require a public figure to be gracious and accommodating to people who have called him a racist, a fascist, a bigot and a misogynist? I wouldn’t associate with anyone who claims that they would be “honored” to have a racist, fascist, bigoted misogynist as a guest, would you?

5. Now here’s a family ethics scandal that isn’t…Country Western star Naomi Judd killed herself in April Her last will and testament revealed that her famous daughters, singer Naomi and actress Ashley, are not mentioned.  The will designates her husband, Larry Strickland, as executor, and gives him “full authority and discretion” over any property with value to her estate “without the approval of any court.” This is supposed to constitute some massive snub, a strike from beyond the grave against Naomi’s daughters. In truth, it is not that unusual for a married could to agree to pass their estates to each other, and leave the ultimate distribution to the survivor’s judgment, often based on private discussions between the two. Moreover, Ashley and her sister are hardly hurting for wealth: Winona has an estimated worth of about $12 million, and Ashly a couple millions more.

18 thoughts on “Evening Ethics Excitement, 8/2/2022: Stop Making Me Defend Nancy Pelosi, And Other Annoyances

  1. On point 1: I agree in principle that Pelosi had ever right to visit Taiwan.
    The cynic in me believes that China is playing us like a fiddle. China’s relationship with Biden is such that they need him to remain in power so that they can further their belt and road strategy without any interference from Biden or a successor with whom they have less leverage. Is it too far fetched to believe this trip was orchestrated to help Biden’s numbers? Didn’t Biden and XIjust spend 2.5 hours on the phone with Xi yet little information about what you as discussed has been made available? I am not totally convinced that the introduction of Covid from China was not designed to harm Trump and promote Biden’s candidacy.

    The questionable relationship between the Biden clan and China would suggest that such a conspiracy would not be out of the realm of possibilities

    China talks tough, Biden stands up to China by supporting Pelosi and the Biden propaganda machine spins his tough leadership and softens public anxiety over his cozy relationship with China.

    • My worry about it is that it is OK to provoke China for the right reasons when you are in a position of strength. Trump did this a lot. We aren’t, however, in a position of strength anymore. We have destroyed our economy intentionally through sanctions that harm us and strengthen Russia and China (BRICS anyone). We gave 7 year’s worth of Javelin missile production to Ukraine. It will take us 7+ years to replace them. We gave almost all our Stinger missiles to Ukraine. We are incapable of producing them anymore. We can’t meet our military recruiting quotas because our woke military doesn’t want the white males who disproportionately die in combat units. Our military is focused on ‘equity’ and ‘inclusion’, but not effectiveness. Our military is presently working on rooting out Republican military members as ‘domestic terrorists’. Less than 25% of our service-age population meets the military entrance requirements and they don’t want 2/3 of those on ideological grounds. Who knows how many of the others aren’t eligible because they won’t take the COVID vaccine?

      After seeing our weakness in Afghanistan and then watching our impotence and self-imposed economic destruction over Ukraine, China is looking for an excuse to invade Taiwan. Since we are incapable of helping Taiwan, should that happen, it is irresponsible for us to give China that excuse.

  2. 4. Looks as if the Democrats and the media will now use the Get Trump playbook on any Republican presidential candidate. Amazing. So “get Trump” was not a one off because of “Trump!” It’s now SOP. Nasty. “Norms? We don’t need not stinking norms!”

  3. on 2. I can still recall to my everlasting regret the party at CEC that resulted in witnessing a drive by nutting of the titular Mouse, by a young patron…the trooper just carried on with his routine

  4. 1) It pains me to say that Pelosi made the right decision, but Pelosi made the right decision in continuing on with her visit to Taiwan (she has, in fact, landed without being shot down).
    I pains me, but doesn’t surprise me, that Biden would work to undermine U.S. resolve and reputation. Before the trip became public it would be fine to tell Pelosi privately “That might not be the best idea.”, but after China made an issue of it, there is no excuse for him to say anything but the diplomatic equivalent of ‘Bite me.’
    Yes, we’re playing a game of chicken with a nuclear armed adversary — so what else is new? We did it for half a century with the Soviet Union, and now for several decades with Communist China. We’re supposed to be the big kids on the block, and have to act like it.

    5) I was looking on Google as to who was the daughter, and discovered that Google will not permit you to search for Winona Judd. It substitutes Wynonna Judd instead and, if you click on ‘Search instead for Winona Judd’ it still returns a search for Wynonna.
    Apparently their censor machine is not infallible. There was a story linked entitled “Winona Judd ….’ and the first sentence starts ‘Wynonna Judd’. There are actually both spellings in the story.

    I had never heard of Wynonna Judd before today. Is this an evil twin, a long long CW singing star, or did she actually change her name? Anyone know? Wikipedia is no help.

    • Wikipedia said she adopted “Wynonna” after singing about “Winona”, Arizona. My guess is the former had always adopted the stylized spelling.

      There is also another actress, “Winona” Ryder, with whom you might have seen that spelling, and are just mixing them up.

  5. 2. I think Steve’s comment is right on the ball. In fact, my first reaction when seeing a headline for the Chuck-E-Cheese story was, “Well, here it goes. Someone’s cashing in on the Disney incident. We’re going to start seeing all kinds of videos of costumed characters seemingly snubbing kids now.”

    I have no idea if the kid was deliberately ignored or not, but Steve is correct in that a very small child is not going to remember the giant rat incident and will only be upset if the adults around her continue to make a big deal out of it and remind her of it.

  6. 1) I don’t understand the snivelry of “don’t do this it might invite conflict”. No…sorry…bad actors have to be confronted. I imagine little Tom Friedman types in 1939-

    “Don’t provoke Hitler over the Anschluss…it might invite conflict”
    “Don’t provoke Hitler over the Sudetenland…it might invite conflict”
    “Don’t provoke Hitler over Poland…it might invite conflict”
    “Don’t provoke Hitler over France…it might invite conflict”
    “Don’t provoke Hitler trying to cross the channel…it might invite conflict”
    “Don’t provoke Hitler for conquering England…it might invite conflict”
    “Don’t provoke Hitler for moving to Mexico…if might invite conflict”
    “Don’t provoke Hitler for talking about the American southwest…it might invite conflict”
    “Don’t prov….”

    Guys…we shouldn’t care what might provoke bad people. *THEY* are the problem…not us

  7. 5. My dad didn’t mention us kids in his will initially, but, after Mom passed, he rewrote it specifically to denote my brother and myself as his heirs, with the understanding that if my brother predeceases, his share will go to his daughter, my niece.

  8. 1. Friedman needs a new brain if he writes in the same sentence a diplomatic visit is both “purely symbolic ” and “lot of bad things could happen”.

    Pick one man. They’re mutually exclusive.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.