Yet Another Pre-Election Story That Should Be Getting Major News Coverage As Relevant To Which Party Is Threatening Democracy

Come to think of it, the Democrats are wielding hammers, though metaphorical ones. More evidence has arrived on how the social media platforms work to serve the current government’s power objectives by suppressing dissent. This has been called a “right wing conspiracy theory” even though the immediate response by Facebook and Twitter to the Hunter Biden laptop report would have been enough to get to a jury if the platforms could be prosecuted for “trying to fix a Presidential election,” and that was two years ago. But every bit of new proof is helpful to convince those apathetic and gullible Americans who need to be hit over the heads with a hammer—I have hammers on the brain today for some reason—before they’ll pay attention.

Twitter: In a final show of defiance that also proved Elon Musk right, Twitter suspended several conservative accounts just as Musk began cleaning house, and only one week before the midterm elections.

Jake Denton, a research associate at Heritage’s Tech Policy Center, found himself suspended on Twitter at 11:10 p.m. on Saturday, Oct. 29. Vince Dao, editor-in-chief at the conservative organization American Virtue, had his account suspended a day earlier. Neither had any hint about what led to their suspensions.

Denton said yesterday,

“Since the election of Donald Trump, Twitter has aggressively targeted and deplatformed young conservatives. It is no coincidence that just a week from Election Day, the leftists at Twitter executed one of the largest conservative ban-waves in the history of the platform.In the middle of the night, Twitter removed conservative political activists and ordinary Americans across the country to further silence conservative voices. Twitter’s targeting of conservative users this close to Election Day is a deliberate political action. Mass bannings have become standard practice against conservatives on Twitter, and Elon Musk needs to immediately put an end to this.”

Musk has, in fact, started to restore the banned accounts. One should consider Denton’s remarks, however, the next time one sees a mainstream media reference to Donald Trump’s “baseless” “Big Lie” that the 2020 election was stolen.

Facebook: The major news, however, is especially relevant to this coming election. The Intercept, which beclowned itself by rejecting the Hunter Biden laptop story (and lost Glenn Greenwald as a result), released a report yesterday, saying in part,

…Behind closed doors, and through pressure on private platforms, the U.S. government has used its power to try to shape online discourse. According to meeting minutes and other records appended to a lawsuit filed by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, a Republican who is also running for Senate, discussions have ranged from the scale and scope of government intervention in online discourse to the mechanics of streamlining takedown requests for false or intentionally misleading information….In a March meeting, Laura Dehmlow, an FBI official, warned that the threat of subversive information on social media could undermine support for the U.S. government. Dehmlow, according to notes of the discussion attended by senior executives from Twitter and JPMorgan Chase, stressed that “we need a media infrastructure that is held accountable.”…There is also a formalized process for government officials to directly flag content on Facebook or Instagram and request that it be throttled or suppressed through a special Facebook portal that requires a government or law enforcement email to use. At the time of writing, the “content request system” at is still live. DHS and Meta, the parent company of Facebook, did not respond to a request for comment. The FBI declined to comment.


I’ll be watching the Times, Post, CNN, NPR and the rest to see if this clear evidence of the Democratic party’s government using its power to hammer down justice and freedom is deemed fit to print or necessary to keep democracy from “dying in darkness.”

4 thoughts on “Yet Another Pre-Election Story That Should Be Getting Major News Coverage As Relevant To Which Party Is Threatening Democracy

  1. The information on Facebook (and others) granting government direct ability to flag content for removal has been out there for about two years or so, I think, but largely ignored by MSM. Even SloJo’s liar Psaki seems to have referenced it over a year ago:

    Here’s a good article by Greenwald (from when he was still on the Intercept and skeptical of Hunter’s laptop) about why the monopolistic control of social media is as dangerous, or more, as government censorship. Is this the one that got him pushed out?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.