This Biased Journalism Fiasco Explains So Much It Should Be Taught In Journalism AND Ethics Classes

Nah, there’s no mainstream media bias! And sure, journalism is a profession! You can always trust journalism icons!

No…no…and no.

Business Insider published an alleged news article headlined, “More people actually moved out of Florida than New York or California in 2021.” Part of the ongoing effort on both the political Rights and the Left to sink Florida Governor Ron DiSantis’s chances of keeping Donald Trump off the GOP 2024 Presidential ticket, the story claimed to debunk the conventional wisdom that the ultra Woke states are bleeding residents while DiSantis’s state’s population is growing. 674,740 residents left Florida, BI told us, exceeding the total of 433,402 residents who had fled California and the 287,249 residents moving out of New York.

It was pure confirmation bias. The stats were unbelievable on their face, but the Business Insider staff believed them anyway, because they wanted to. After being roundly smacked on social media, BI reversed itself with a replacement post headlined, “We got it wrong: More people moved out of New York and California than Florida in 2021,” that revealed,

  • Out-of-staters flocked to Florida in 2021, with some 674,740 people moving there. 
  • About 469,577 residents left the state, for a net population gain of 205,163.
  • The state became a big draw for Americans who decided to move during the pandemic.

The correction and mea culpa was issued on July 11. Never mind! Yesterday, the Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin, once one of the Post’s few conservatives and now a certifiable Democratic Party mouthpiece as a result of virulent Trump Derangement, issued a column for subscribers that cited the abandoned BI article and states as fact,

“DeSantis likes to brag that more people are moving to Florida than ever. Not so fast. “An estimated 674,740 people reported that their permanent address changed from Florida to another state in 2021. That’s more than any other state, including New York or California, the two states that have received the most attention for outbound migration during the pandemic,” according to the American Community Survey released in June tracking state-by-state migration.”

She also falsely attributed the bad stats to the ACS survey when she had to get them from Business Insider’s botch. Not only that, but the column is still on the Post’s website, uncorrected.

Why did this happen? Well, it’s a hit job, and clearly facts don’t matter to Rubin or the Post: the idea is to poison public opinion against DiSantis and Republicans. Look at how Rubin introduces her deception:

“Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and his obedient Republican legislature have made bullying and attacking the vulnerable the hallmarks of their governance. Whether it is “don’t say gay” legislation (and retribution against Disney for supporting inclusion), denying medical care to transgender youths, muzzling teachers and professors who address systemic racism in the United States, firing a county prosecutor who dared object to DeSantis’s refusal to protect women’s bodily autonomy, or shipping unwary immigrants to other states, Florida has become not where “woke” died but rather where empathy, decency and kindness go to die.”

I count five factual mischaracterizations in that rant, not counting her “where empathy, decency and kindness go to die” nonsense. How can a supposedly professional, trustworthy, objective icon of journalism like the Washington Post permit Rubin’s hackery to be published under its banner (which proclaims “democracy dies in darkness”)? It can happen because ethical, objective, and competent journalism is deader than Kant. It can happen because partisan and ideological bias is not only not avoided, it is encouraged and rewarded. It can happen because this is no longer a profession—meaning that it can and must be trusted—but a a corrupt institution dedicated not to bolstering democracy, but crippling it.

Good to know, don’t you think?

Thanks, Business Insider, Rubin, Washington Post editors! You provided some light in the darkness anyway despite your best efforts.

7 thoughts on “This Biased Journalism Fiasco Explains So Much It Should Be Taught In Journalism AND Ethics Classes

  1. [Awful, biased journalism] can happen because ethical, objective, and competent journalism is deader than Kant. It can happen because partisan and ideological bias is not only not avoided, it is encouraged and rewarded. It can happen because this is no longer a profession—meaning that it can and must be trusted—but a corrupt institution dedicated not to bolstering democracy but crippling it.

    Bears repeating.

  2. Democrats. If they didn’t have their lies, they would never have anything to say. But you’re right, Jack. I also believe she knew ahead of time what she was publishing was a debunked pack of lies. But the truth didn’t serve her purpose.

  3. Dems/lefties always use this tactic: push narratives and stats that know are false or misleading because they appreciate that the impact of the lies and falsities far exceeds the effects of any corrections or retractions, assuming they even bother to do so. This has been particularly on fall display since January 2017, and has not abated or slowed down, and will not as long as it will continue to work for them (which is why they’re hell bent on controlling social media which may undermine their near-monopoly of MSM).

    • None of which really matters so long as they control the voting rules and physically control the ballot boxes in key states. Joe Biden could shoot somebody on Park Avenue in the middle of the day or accept a ten-million-dollar bribe from China on prime-time TV while having a stroke and he’ll still get re-elected. The Dems will also be able to retain control of the Senate and regain control of the house. Because of mail in ballot harvesting.

  4. Dear Washington Post, Yes, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” – especially when you tout a band of so-called journalism professionals scampering around the country pulling the shades down.

  5. Fundamental facts / tendencies in human geography will demonstrate that places with high inmigration rates also have high outmigratoin rates.

    A state like Florida will many people moving into the state but also many people leaving the state.

    A state like Maine will have few people moving into the state but also few people leaving it.

    charles w abbott
    rochester, NY

    • Ravenstein’s Rules are worth reviewing on this matter.

      Wikipedia has a nice short entry for him. The full name is Ernst Georg Ravenstein.

      = – = – = – =

      There is probably a general principle. It is easy to mislead people, or simply write things that aren’t necessarily true, when discussing rates. Rates tend to be partly a function of the base number.

      If you know that Florida is a big state (3d largest by population) and also growing at a steady clip, one can imagine that

      1. Huge numbers of people are leaving Florida these days. Gigantic numbers!
      2. Simultaneously, the state is also growing in population.

      charles w abbott
      rochester, NY

Leave a reply to charles abbott Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.