I barely have to comment on this one. Incredibly, the British House of Commons sent the letter above to Chris Pavlovsky, asking Rumble’s CEO to censor actor/comic Russell Brand as YouTube has (discussed in this post from yesterday.)
Pavlovsky’s response:
The Brits really never have gotten our Constitution, have they? Unfortunately, an increasing number of Americans, including those who run news, social media and Big Tech platforms don’t get it either.
Ethics Alarms 
It seems to me that such a letter to an American business could be evidence of a denial of rights. It matters not that Brand is a British subject if the income is derived through an American business.
If a strong condemnation from the President of the U.S is not forthcoming it will be indicative of Biden’s willingness to allow foreign nations to interfere with he rights of those on American soil. If the House of Commons engaged in retribution against Rumble for failing to acquiesce to their wishes we should use our trade policy to make such retribution very costly.
Biden (or whoever is pulling his strings) definitely will not condemn this; rather, he and democrats will try to emulate it in short time.
Russell Brand has been questioning things that the powers that be don’t want questioned. Maybe he is a sexual predator, or maybe his accusers are pawns of the state. I’m not going to automatically side with the state just because some people come forward forward years after the assaults they claim happened are supposed to have happened when it is currently politically expedient for them to make such claims and no such claims existed while political expediency was non-existent. Politically expedient rape claims have lost their validity thanks to the state treating such claims with political bias. Innocent until proven guilty has morphed to non-existent until proven guilty to my mind. I side entirely with rumble in this case.