Friday Open Ethics Forum!

I would think that the forum should be roiling today. It will also give me some time to finish a post about the aftermath of the humiliating performance by the three college presidents before Congress this week..

6 thoughts on “Friday Open Ethics Forum!

  1. Here is an article worth commenting about.

    https://apnews.com/article/trump-indictment-justice-department-takeover-democracy-threats-7b399ab628db7330ed99fac8c3784170

    In the two-and-a-half years since the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol, Congress passed a bipartisan law closing loopholes in the complex process of choosing a new president that Donald Trump tried to exploit in his push to stay in office after losing the 2020 election.

    Candidates for crucial swing-state election posts who backed Trump’s push to overturn the 2020 election all lost their bids in last year’s elections. And, this week, federal prosecutors filed four felony charges against the former president for his role in the scheme to overturn President Joe Biden’s win.

    But while those avenues for electoral mischief may be blocked or severely constrained in 2024, the prosecution — along with another federal indictment accusing Trump of mishandling classified information after leaving office — is providing additional urgency among conservatives for a plan to make over the U.S. Department of Justice.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    That’s a step democracy advocates warn could mark a new assault on the U.S. system should Trump win the presidency a second time.

    “The incentives for him to move in that direction will be even stronger, and we should worry even more about the degree of control he’ll attempt to wield over federal law enforcement,” said Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Dartmouth College and co-director of Bright Line Watch, an academic group that monitors democracy in the U.S. “We have many examples from other countries demonstrating the dangers of a political takeover of law enforcement.”

    RELATED STORIES
    FILE – Attorney General Merrick Garland arrives with President Joe Biden for an event in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, May 13, 2022. The Justice Department is facing the biggest test in its history in the prosecution of former President Donald Trump. Try as Garland might, though, there is no escaping the politics of the moment when the Justice Department of a president who is running for reelection is indicting his chief political rival, the front-runner for the Republican nomination. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)
    Justice Department faces biggest test in its history with election conspiracy case against Trump
    Former President Donald Trump speaks at a fundraiser event for the Alabama GOP, Friday, Aug. 4, 2023, in Montgomery, Ala. (AP Photo/Butch Dill)
    Trump was told not to talk to witnesses in 2020 election conspiracy case. That could be a challenge
    Former President Donald Trump arrives at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Thursday, Aug. 3, 2023, in Arlington, Va., as he heads to Washington to face a judge on federal conspiracy charges alleging Trump conspired to subvert the 2020 election. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
    Trump pleads not guilty to federal charges that he tried to overturn the 2020 election
    To be sure, other risks for American democracy beyond a takeover of federal law enforcement remain. The myth that Trump won the 2020 election has taken firm hold in the Republican electorate, with nearly 60% of GOP voters saying in an Associated Press poll last fall that Biden was not legitimately elected. The belief has led millions to distrust voting machines, mail balloting and vote counting while leading to death threats against election officials.

    Numerous rural counties have seen election conspiracy theorists take control of elections and vote-counting, raising worries of more election chaos next year. Certification of election results remains a potential pressure point for delaying or undermining a final outcome in the next election — whether by local commissions, state certification boards, legislatures or even Congress.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Despite those potential risks, the accelerating GOP primary has highlighted a new worry for some — calls by Trump and his allies for more control of federal prosecutions. Several legal experts highlighted this as perhaps the most troubling threat to the country’s democratic institutions should Trump — or another Republican — win the White House next year.

    Currently, the president can appoint the attorney general and other top Department of Justice officials, subject to Senate confirmation, but has more limited tools to change the behavior of career prosecutors.

    “Doing away with or diminishing the independence of the Justice Department would be a huge mistake,” said Paul Coggins, past president of the National Association of Former U.S. Attorneys. “We can’t afford for people to lose more faith in the system than they have now.”

    He said federal prosecutors have been paying attention to Trump’s recent vows to seize greater control of the system.

    FILE – Former President Donald Trump speaks before he boards his plane at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Aug. 3, 2023, in Arlington, Va. Special counsel Jack Smith’s team obtained a search warrant in January for records related to former President Donald Trump’s Twitter account, and a judge levied a $350,000 fine on the company for missing the deadline to company. That’s according to court documents released Wednesday. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
    Former President Donald Trump speaks before he boards his plane at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Aug. 3, 2023, in Arlington, Va. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “I think the fact that Trump has raised this idea sent shock waves through prosecutors everywhere,” Coggins said.

    Trump and other conservatives have argued that such a takeover is overdue, especially because they see the prosecutions against him as the 2024 campaign is heating up as nakedly political. Indeed, after his previous indictment, Trump vowed to pursue Biden and his family should he return to the White House.

    “This is the persecution of the person that’s leading by very, very substantial numbers in the Republican primary and leading Biden by a lot,” Trump told reporters after his most recent arraignment. “So if you can’t beat ’em, you persecute ’em or you prosecute ’em.”

    At a Republican Party dinner Friday night in Alabama, Trump repeated his claims that the latest criminal case he faces is an “outrageous criminalization of political speech,” and said his “enemies” were trying to stop him and his political movement with “an army of rabid, left-wing lawyers, corrupt and really corrupt Marxist prosecutors,” “deranged government agents and rogue intelligence officers.”

    He called the indictment “an act of desperation by a failed and disgraced, crooked Joe Biden and his radical left thugs to preserve their grip on power.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Allies of Trump’s, including his former budget office head Russell Vought and Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department official who was involved enough in the push to overturn the election that he is referred to in the indictment as “Co-Conspirator 4,” are working on a plan to increase control of the federal bureaucracy the next time a Republican is in the White House. That would include at the Department of Justice, where internal regulations limit the influence of the president and other political actors.

    Vought and the organization he helps run to map out future control of the bureaucracy, the Center for Renewing America, did not respond to requests for comment.

    The push does not only come from Trump, suggesting how his contentious views toward federal law enforcement have shaped a party that has long promoted itself as the protector of law-and-order. On the day the most recent indictment was released this week, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis called for a new FBI director and the right for defendants to choose not to be prosecuted in Washington, D.C., a primarily Democratic city. House Republicans have empaneled a committee to investigate what they call the “weaponization” of federal law enforcement. FBI director Christopher Wray, a Republican nominated to the position by Trump, has become a frequent target of Republican attacks.

    Some longtime conservatives say they’ve become disillusioned with the agency’s conduct, especially in recent years as they see it pursuing Trump with more vigor than Democrats such as Biden’s son Hunter.

    “The Justice Department has become more politicized and leaned more and more to the left as the years have gone on,” said Mark Corallo, who was communications director for the department under President George W. Bush.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Corallo, who described his politics as “Never-Again Trump,” said career lawyers in the agency are reliably Democratic. But he also scoffed at the notion of being able to more tightly control them, absent reform of the civil service system that protects their jobs.

    “I think there is a zero chance that the career people at the Justice Department will ever bend to his will,” Corallo said.

    Trump tried to enlist the agency in his fight to stay in office. Election conspiracy theorists urged him to use the Department of Justice to seize voting machines to highlight the search for fraud. Trump tried to get the agency to announce probes of some of his supporters’ more paranoid theories of how the election was stolen, even after his own attorney general, William Barr, told him there was no indication of widespread fraud.

    Wendy Weiser of the Brennan Center for Justice, said Justice Department attorneys helped stop Trump’s attempt to stay in office, and worried that, if he becomes president again, there may not be similar safeguards the next time.

    “Had the department not resisted the attempts to enlist it in this conspiracy, it could have actually led to a sabotaged election,” she said.

    What happens in future elections, voting officials said, is up to the voters themselves.

    “Every American needs to consider what role are they going to play in this moment,” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, said in an interview. “Are they going to potentially support candidates who would enable — not just an obstruction — but an elimination of justice? Or are they going to consider that when weighing their decisions at the ballot box next year?”

  2. Some time ago, there was a suggestion of coming up with a phone etiquette list. I’ve thought a lot about this. Phone etiquette hasn’t really changed all that much since the inception of telephones. What has changed is technology.

    Beginning with answering machines, missed calls – especially important ones – could be returned. Call screening came into vogue in order to avoid telemarketers or other callers to whom the recipients didn’t wish to speak. Caller ID technology helped the screening process move along nicely.

    Finally, the mobile phone became affordable for nearly everyone and has changed the way we communicate. It’s only where we use telephones now that has changed, not the rules of their use. Unfortunately, instead of landline etiquette informing mobile phone etiquette, the use of cell phones has caused bad habits to emerge that are now affecting landline use, as well.

    Let me preface my telephone rules by stating as a given that there will be times in which using a phone in a public place is essential. Essential is not always a life or death situation. It’s far more efficient to call one’s spouse at the grocery store to clarify which brand of butter is needed rather than taking a guess and risk being wrong. There are still such things as manners, though.

    I’m going to start off with the assertion that telephone etiquette requires that one first understands how to use one’s phone. The owner must know how to: turn the phone on and off, answer or reject calls, access voicemail, switch alerts to mute, vibrate and back to audio, turn alarms on and off, turn speakerphone on and off, activate dialpad/keypad, hide or minimize screens, check and send text messages and emails, mute/unmute one’s end of a conversation, place a call on hold and take it off hold, and raise and lower volume.

    And be able to do these things without disconnecting a live call.

    Understanding how to use the phone is the first step in practicing good phone etiquette. Now, onto the rules themselves.

    1. The Basics Rule: A proper greeting and farewell is requisite. A polite “hello” combined with identifying yourself starts the call off right. When it’s time for the call to end, make sure it’s clear that you are getting off the phone. A simple “good-bye”, “talk to you later” or “Thanks for your assistance” should suffice.

    2. The Civility Rule: If you are going into the call upset, impatient or angry, take a few moments to take a deep breath and calm down. Shouting, cursing, name-calling and other personal attacks do not result in better service. They also reflect poorly on you personally which makes it easier to minimize your problem and could cause negative consequences for you.

    3. The Undivided Attention Rule: If you know you are going to make or receive a call, try to do so in a quiet place free of distractions. Turn off televisions, radios and ask others around you to speak softly and avoid interrupting you while on the call.

    Yes, this is often easier said than done. If your child begins screaming or the postman needs your signature on an important package right now, ask your caller to hold and handle the situation.

    You should not be on the phone while driving. Besides being dangerous, bad connections can cause communication problems and dropped calls.

    Trying to conduct business and having a personal conversation at the same time causes misunderstandings, causes delays to others and is rude. Restaurants are pushing back on customers on the phone at the same time orders are being placed because it causes mistakes when the customer is not paying attention. A customer service representative on the phone may not be able to determine who you are talking to if it is clear you are also having a conversation with someone else at the same time.

    Ask your caller to hold while you take care of your business or let the customer behind you go ahead until you are ready.

    4. The Hold Button is Your Friend Rule: It is unacceptable to ask the caller to hold and then put the phone down, allowing your caller to hear a personal conversation or other private matter happening. Use your hold or mute button to protect the privacy of yourself and anyone with you.

    5. The Speakerphone Rule: Avoid using it unless absolutely necessary.

    Speakerphone makes hearing someone difficult when that person walks away from the phone and keeps talking.

    If you do use it, inform the other person on the line that the conversation is not private and identify who else can hear what’s being said.

    It is jarring to be listening to someone and suddenly hear a completely different voice jump in speaking or asking questions without preamble. The use of speakerphone does not give license to cut in on a phone call without greeting the person on the other line and introducing oneself…regardless of who is on the other line.

    Remember that Bluetooth latency is a known issue, as well, and causes delays transmitting voices that often results in participants accidentally interrupting each other.

    6. The Soul of Wit Rule: Make any public calls as brief as possible and try to keep your voice down. No one wants to hear even one side of a long personal conversation in the middle of a grocery store aisle or while walking a dog in the park.

    7. The Flush Rule: Eating, using the bathroom and causing other unpleasant recognizable noises should be avoided while on the phone.

    8. The Be Prepared Rule: When you know you will be conducting important business via phone, have all pertinent documents and information ready, such as account numbers, billing statements, payment methods or letters. You know you will be asked for this, so why not make the process smoother, faster and more efficient?

    9. The Silence Rule: Your phone should be off, set to vibrate and not visible when you are at a public event, such as a wedding, funeral, speech, concert, religious service, play or any performance. If you must take a call, leave discreetly and have your discussion elsewhere.

    10. The Camera Rule: Someone’s bad day is not your ticket to stardom. Treat others the way you would want to be treated and keep your phone off when another person falls, spills food or is having an argument.

    • In our office, when I have a client at the desk, the general rule is not to answer the phone, whether it’s the office phone or my cell phone. I think this is only proper, as you should be giving all your attention to your client. I might make an exception if it were my sister, as that would be more likely to be a health situation, but still….

      Some clients do the same, some just take calls like they were at home.

      I think one of the problems is that most of us have been conditioned that we must always answer the phone. At home, we’ve pretty much stopped answering the landline unless we recognize the caller id — but 98% of those calls are spam.

      Civility is very important, I think, if for pragmatic reasons only. If you want someone to do something for you, will cursing them or berating them make it more likely to happen? And it’s rude.

  3. In other new, Maryland’s AG has had to reinstate Zainab Chaudry to the Maryland Commission on Hate Crimes. He had suspended her for antisemitic remarks about the Oct 7 attacks.

    Jack covered this a week or so ago.

Leave a reply to Diego Garcia Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.