Final Ethics Observations on the Media’s Alito Flag Set-Up

…the main one being that the distress signal is appropriate, because the Axis of Unethical Conduct proved with this fiasco that it is ruthless, shameless, untrustworthy, and will do anything in 2024 to mislead the public if it might mean a few extra votes for Democrats. Or maybe the main one is that your friendly neighborhood ethicist was right about this story from the very start, which is why Fredo asked to make another appearance as my spokesman.

And this, my friends, is why we can’t have nice things.

Or a functioning republic.

Let me not get to far ahead of myself. Right now, the whole, biased, corrupt, anti-Trump, anti-conservative, Biden-protecting propaganda-spewing mainstream news media, the third partner in the Ethics Alarms-dubbed Axis of Unethical Conduct (“the resistance,” and Desperate Democrats completing the troika) is doing a mass Jumbo (“Flags? What flags?”) regarding what was its favorite earth-shattering scandal a week ago. This sudden amnesia was brought on because the Washington Post, perhaps seeking to embarrass its old rival, effectively eviscerated the Times’ “Get Justice Alito!” scoop, which EA first discussed here, and subsequently here, here, and here. (Don’t make me describe it again: I was sick of it days ago.)

Two days ago, the Post revealed that it had known about the first flag episode more than three years ago and had decided that it wasn’t newsworthy (because, as the revealed facts showed clearly, it wasn’t). Now-retired SCOTUS reporter Robert Barnes traveled to the Alito’s home on January 20, 2021, the day of Joe Biden’s inauguration, to follow-up on an anonymous tip he had received from some Alito-hating asshole neighbor about the flag. After investigating, Barnes and the Post concluded there was no story, because the flag-raising appeared to be the work of Martha-Ann Alito, Alito’s wife, not the Justice, as part of her dispute with her neighbors.

” (Barnes) encountered the couple coming out of the house. Martha-Ann Alito was visibly upset by his presence, demanding that he “get off my property,” the Post story explained. “As he described the information he was seeking, she yelled, ‘It’s an international signal of distress!’ Alito intervened and directed his wife into a car parked in their driveway, where they had been headed on their way out of the neighborhood. The justice denied the flag was hung upside down as a political protest, saying it stemmed from a neighborhood dispute and indicating that his wife had raised it.”

 The account continued, “Martha-Ann Alito then got out of the car and shouted in apparent reference to the neighbors: ‘Ask them what they did!’ She said yard signs about the couple had been placed in the neighborhood. After getting back in the car, she exited again and then brought out from their residence a novelty flag, the type that would typically decorate a garden. She hoisted it up the flagpole. “There! Is that better?” she yelled.”

No story! Never mind, though: the New York Times was directed to pretend it is one now, in 2024, by its dark masters in the DNC, or somewhere, so Democrats would have something to claim Alito is biased in favor of Trump and needs to recuse himself for all the “lawfare” related cases on the Supreme Court’s horizon.

When Alito told the Times that he had nothing to do with the flag-raising, the Left’s flying monkeys, as conservative blogger Stephen Kruiser likes to call these awful people, accused him of lying. The deranged Nation hysteric Elie Mystal, all of MSNBC (of course), CBS’s “all-Republican hate all the time because it’s funny!” late-night host Stephen Colbert, the Times’ anti-white racist pundit (well, one of them) Jamelle Bouie, and, sadly, many of the alleged ethicists in the legal ethics association I hang with and many more all impugned Alito’s character because they wanted this to undermine his credibility.

The Times follow-up attack about another historical flag raised at an Alito abode was also debunked by the Post’s revelation (which, of course, it could have published as soon as the Times story first appeared, but no, better to let the hated conservative Justice twist in the metaphorical wind for a while). Mrs. Alito is obviously an irrepressible flag-flyer. Justice Alito is obviously unable to control his wife. Gee, imagine that.

I guess nobody remembers Martha Mitchell any more.

Alito is my third least-favorite Justice on the Supreme Court (behind Thomas and Sotomayor), but this whole episode infuriates me. I want to echo lawyer Joseph Welch, in the inspired moment he took down Rep. Joe McCarthy, by asking the our “journalists,” “Have you no sense of decency…? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”

But the answer is so evident that the question doesn’t have to be asked. No, they don’t! None at all. They are liars, assassins, propagandists, tools, and enemies of the people and democracy.

And in this election year, they are just getting started.

8 thoughts on “Final Ethics Observations on the Media’s Alito Flag Set-Up

  1. This entire tempest in a teapot is so predictable and so transparently on-the-nose for the American Left. The cretinous harpies you mention in the media who have taken to their fainting couches over the Alito family flags are motivated by the same impulses as their prosecution of Donald Trump in various fora — politics without restraint, remorse, or regard for decency — even sanity!

    What will happen if the Right takes over government? Will they exact revenge, as we are constantly assured by the Leftist media they will? Will they attempt to find a middle ground, as many on the far Right fear? Is there any way to coexist with this sort of to-the-death politics, or are we bound to come to metaphorical (and perhaps literal) blows?

    I don’t think we have very long to wait to find out the answers to all of the above. God help us.

  2. Glenn

    I assume I am a middle of the road conservative who does not want to see revenge. Middle ground does not mean turning a blind eye to wrongdoing. The best thing Trump could do would be to issue a Presidential pardon to Biden. Let him carry that around for the rest of his life and demonstrates a desire to promote American political norms

    • Oh, I agree. I wasn’t casting aspersions on middle ground, just observing that some conservatives would consider even seriously negotiating with the Democrats heresy, if not treason.

      My point? The politics of today is so toxic, it’s virtually political zugzwang. You can’t do anything without making your political position worse.

      And I agree 100% about pardoning Biden, although it would (and I think you are alluding to this) hurt his reputation with virtually everybody in America except perhaps his immediate family, who appear to be as wed to corruption as he.

      Frankly, that would be a 4-d chess move on Trump’s part — appearing “compassionate” to most but actually a nasty form of revenge. Plus, pardons are not subject to acceptance or rejection. As a plenary power, it can’t be rejected by anyone, especially the person pardoned.

      Trump should let Hunter go to prison, though, and stay there for the duration of his sentence.

  3. I will confess that in the immediate aftermath of the rigged (as opposed to “stolen”) 2020 election, I flew a US flag upside down for several days; it took me nearly a week to talk myself down from that particular infuriating ledge. I will also admit being a bit of a vexillophile about historical flags in general. I have one flagpole right outside my house which customarily displays the Stars and Stripes along with our state flag. Down the hill, a couple of our outbuildings have their own flagpoles. One of these displays the Betsy Ross Flag, the other flies the Christian Flag. At my workshop, another flagpole flies either the Pine Tree Flag, or a variant of the Gadsden flag under which some of my Revolutionary War patriot militia ancestors fought Loyalists and Cherokees in colonial Georgia and South Carolina. Occasionally the Bonnie Blue Flag makes an appearance, as a reminder of our inherent right of rebellion.

    I fly my flags because of what they mean to me, not for what they might “trigger” in others. Although I fly my flags 24-7, only my Stars and Stripes flag is visible from outside my property and it is well-lit at night with the brightest solar pole-top light I could find. I fastidiously observe my states half-staff days and even get an email to help me remember. (One of my friends calls my place Fort Defiance.) I suppose some woke idiot not from around here could look at the flags on my property and draw all sorts of inaccurate conclusions about my personal and political philosophies. My response to any judgement rendered on that basis is, “Bite me.” I respect Justice Alito’s right to (literally or figuratively) do the same.

  4. I took no umbrage at your middle of the road statement. I should have written my statement as “I consider myself a . . .” instead of I assume. . .

    You correctly interpreted my allusion. Let that be his albatross around his neck for all eternity.

  5. Has anyone asked the neighbors what they did?

    Based on local drama, surely someone played music past 9PM on a Friday, or mowed their lawn before 8AM, or—horror of all horrors—neglected to grab a poop bag for a recent dog walk.

Leave a reply to Chris Marschner Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.