The instant ethics train wreck, courtesy of The Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman Ethics Train Wreck, The Ferguson Ethics Train Wreck, The George Floyd Freakout, the Obama Administration Ethics Train Wreck, the DEI Ethics Train Wreck and The Great Stupid, is described by Campus Reform, thusly:
A primarily black student group at the University of Missouri was recently forced to change the name of that it is planning on hosting. The Legion of Black Collegians reportedly intended to name [a back-to-school barbecue event] the “Welcome Black BBQ,” but was forced to change the name by the university administration. The event, which is scheduled to be hosted on Friday, will now be called the “Welcome Black and Gold BBQ,” a reference to the school’s colors. The group wrote in an Instagram post on Aug. 16 that it is “heartbroken” at the name change.
Ugh.
In a sane world, there is no reason that a black organization titling a back-to-school event “Welcome Black” would offend anyone with a brain larger than a pinto bean. But we do not live in a sane world, or a sane country.
In a society where race is relegated to its proper status and double standards don’t run amuck, black student organizations on campuses would be neither necessary nor acceptable (just as white student organizations are not considered acceptable.) But Americans don’t live in a society where race is relegated to its proper status.
In a higher education environment where colleges and universities have not engaged in blatant racial discrimination and enabled speech and activities that targeted specific groups for marginalization and hostility, no school administrators would feel compelled to block something as seemingly benign as a play on words employed to promote a student event, in fear of being sued.
But the many colleges and universities have engaged in blatant racial discrimination and enabled speech and activities that target specific campus groups for marginalization and hostility.
In a healthy culture where black citizens do not feel compelled to express animus and distrust of white citizens (who are demonized for purportedly expressing animus and distrust toward them) a black student group informed that its little pun was offensive and not sufficiently “inclusive” would shrug, think, “Wow, that’s silly” and accept a more neutral name.
But we don’t have a healthy culture, and black citizens do feel compelled to express animus and distrust of white citizens as a matter of justice and right.
Verdict: this episode could not happen in a healthy America. Those who have created the conditions that created this and other divisive scenarios for their own political and financial gains are ethics villains.
We can only hope that they are eventually held accountable.

Call me dense but I am confused about this post. This was not a simple play on words it was used to characterize an event that appeared to be exclusive for one particular group.
I agree that none of this should occur but it is the case so I’m not sure who should be held accountable. Should it be the groups that promote division or the administration that try’s to mitigate such division.
What is interesting is that this is held by the Pan-African students so why would it be open to all black students and not just the foreign nationals from Africa enrolled? Most Blacks in the US have at best a tenuous connection to Africa just as I have with Europe.
Call me dense but I am confused about this post. This was not a simple play on words it was used to characterize an event that appeared to be exclusive for one particular group.
Maybe. Maybe not. In a more trusting environment, it would be seen as just a black group with “black” in its name playing on that. If I ran a college Chess Club, and we held a social event with the line “Chess What You’ve Been Waiting For! A Back-To-School Mixer!”, would it be seen as excluding non-chess players?
And that’s the point. Everything is interpreted to be racially divisive.
Chess and race are very different things (save and except what happens in Russia, which is open only to those with a high tolerance for mercury). Chess social events are open to all people who like or are interested in chess. This, though a play on words, is a political hot potato. Think about: The Clemson Tide has a tailgate party open all Tiders (not sure at the moment what Clemson students are called and I am too lazy to look it up [even though i do like that Steely Dan song . . .]) regardless of racial affiliation. A Black fraternity holding a BBQ for black students would be seen for just what it is – an exclusionary event targeting one race over another.
jvb