When we last left unethical Fulton County prosecutor Fani Willis, lover Nathan Wade had been kicked off her case and the prosecution was probably dead in the metaphorical water, in part thanks to Willis creating the appearance of impropriety, a conflict of interest, and proving herself to be grossly incompetent as well a contemptuous of prosecutorial ethics standards. She did all these by bringing her boy friend on as a member of her team and going on vacations with him. Trump’s appeal to have Willis removed from the case is still pending.
Wade and her honeybug faced an inquiry into their alleged conflict of interest, and both claimed their romantic relationship began in early 2022, after the grand jury investigation into Trump’s alleged misdeeds was already underway. Evidence that came out during the inquiry suggested, however, that both were lying.
Nathan Wade told the House Judiciary Committee last week during a closed-door deposition that Willis was preparing to prosecute Trump even before she took office in January 2021. That Willis approached Wade to mobilize the prosecution of Trump means the Fulton DA was targeting Trump while he was still in office and challenges to the 2020 election were ongoing.
More interestingly, the Committee grilled Wade about the meetings he had in President Joe Biden’s White House, with members of the Star Chamber J-6 Committee, and probably Justice Department attorneys. Wade billed his time for the meeting to Willis’s prosecution. His meetings were uncovered in court filings this year, but Wade claimed that the details regarding who participated in the meetings, what they were about and what was said just, you know, flew out of his head. “I do not recall,” Wade said when asked about the meetings. In fact, he said it repeatedly, as you can see in the transcript.
The Washington Examiner coyly writes in part, “Wade’s talks with the federal government has invited speculation that allies of Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris were politically motivated to assist Wade with bringing charges against Trump…”
Gee, ya think?
Ethics Alarms 
in regards to law fare, more televised hearings and trials will eventually change DA behavior. When your voters see the sausage being made, hard to keep up the overcharging and other shitty uses of the legal (not Justice) system.
Oh, I don’t know about that. We tried electing a DA who wasn’t funded by George Soros. He was 48 and in great health. Then died suddenly 3 days after winning the election. The Soros-funded DA then claimed that since he was the only one still on the ballot, he won re-election after all. The Mayor and City Council agreed with him. Luckily, someone got the governor involved. The DA tried to throw the prosecution of a coach who had been molesting students at the high school for more than a decade. When this was brought up in open court, the DA resigned and moved out of town with 2 months left on his term. The governor appointed the DA who held the position 4 years earlier and had also protected the child molester by dismissing all complaints. The city hasn’t gotten around to having a new election to replace the position. It has been 2 years.
One person tried to complain about it at the public comment section of the City Council meeting. He was arrested. He was fined and banned from all city property forever by the judge because publicizing corruption puts the lives of the public officials at risk.