Well.
Of all of the lawfare attacks on Trump, one involving a disputed “he said/she said” incident that had far exceeded the statute of limitations ( extended by the New York legislature in part to “get” Trump), then funded by a liberal, Trump-hating billionaire, is a particular thin reed on which to try to hang this kind of hysteria. But it is especially shameless coming in support of the party that has repeatedly celebrated serial sexual predator Bill Clinton, embraced his wife who enabled him, ignored the current President’s documented sexual assaults on women and young girls, and whose icons, like all three Kennedy brothers, have as frightening histories as abusers as any American politicians in history. And who can forget Hillary pal Harvey Weinstein, and Bill Clinton buddy Jeffrey Epstein, two of the most prolific sexual predators who ever roamed the earth…and both Democrats. Or Andrew Cuomo, who secretly recruited the head of “Time’s Up” to help him discredit one of his “survivors.”
Meanwhile, the news media is embargoing any coverage of aspiring “First Gentleman” Doug Emhoff’s sexual exploitation of an employee and alleged incidents of abusing female companions.
Trump’s presence in the White House, however, would send the message that sexual violence is acceptable. This ad is epic chutzpah.
But the Democrats sense that Harris is losing, so anything, even flaming double standards and hypocrisy, goes now. I can’t imagine what they’ll try next week.
Ethics Alarms 
Well, there’s this for what’s next:
Donald Trump allegedly ‘groped’ a model after she met him through Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail Online
Doubtless coming to a (every?) mainstream media outlet near you tomorrow morning.
This ad plus the Daily Mail article has all the Hallmarks of Labour Party tactics to meddle in US elections.
Notice how it is addressed “Dear Americans” that is how Europeans refer to us.
It’s definitely proof that a cause is out of ideas when they start resorting to throwing mud like this. Anyone could have created this ad, it’s not even signed by an organization. Yet the New York times chose to run with it. Every other accusation the Democratic party has thrown at Trump has fallen short. Do they really think that bringing up something that’s been out there for quite a while now and was obviously a transparent lawfare attempt to destroy Trump that failed is going to change everyone’s minds now? It didn’t change a whole lot of minds then, and it’s not going to change many minds now. Maybe the hope is that it will shame enough men into switching their vote so as not to be thought of as enabling Trump or make enough women mad that they will force their men to switch their vote, but I think that’s doubtful at this point.
I think, as you point out, that a lot of folks are seeing through the obvious double standards and are not blind to what has gone on the past year. A vote for Harris is a vote to enable a banana Republic state in this country. Unfortunately, pointing out the various double standards of the democratic party when it comes to is like pouring water on a duck. It’s completely useless. It’s also a simple appeal to anger in an election where Kamala Harris has done everything she can possibly do to avoid talking about policy, ideas, or plans.
Please leave.
Oh no, is he back again? To Spam Hell he goes, without me reading a word….
This isn’t anything new. The Democrats and their advocates in the news media, et al, have been promoting blazing double standards for years.
You left out Tara Reade who accused Biden of sexual assault.
Not “proven,” though, as with Juanita Broadrick and other alleged Clinton victims. And, of course, Monica doesn’t count because it was all her fault.
I suppose, but that did not stop the Daily Mail with the story about the model groped by Trump and his sidekick Jeff Epstein. No matter just got done voting, so all the mud they throw won’t affect my vote.
Also, you cannot prove that which never gets investigated. Reade should have complained loudly and vociferously when (if) it occurred. The same is true for every other woman who claims victimization.
Very little that the Democrats and their allies might do between now and Election Day, no matter how desperate (other than an outright military coup) would surprise me at this point.
I’m confident that the counterfeit ballots are already printed and awaiting distribution to the appropriate precincts where preparations are made to integrate them among the legitimate ballots where, as we learned in 2020, they cannot then be distinguished, disqualified or even questioned. I fear that the states have not done enough to undo the changes implemented during the Wuhan Flu Mass Population Control Experiment.
As much as I disdain early voting, I voted last week in order to bank my vote lest I get hit by a train or suffer some other calamity that would preclude my voting on November 5th. I know a lot of other folks voting Republican who are doing the same. My local Republican Party officials say the available data shows their voters are turning out in record numbers to vote early. They also have a well-organized “free ride to the polls” program. Even though Trump carried my county with nearly 80% of the vote in 2020, he won the state with only about 61% of the vote. Trump voters need to counteract the Democrat strongholds in three of our biggest cities.
I’m appalled by reports that many Christians will be sitting out this election because Trump is in their eyes too flawed an individual to earn their vote, and/or because he won’t endorse a (doomed to fail) federal abortion ban. I have heard no such talk among members of my church or other Christians I know. I suspect this is a manufactured (or at least overblown) phenomenon to give cover to the weak-kneed. My own dear mother, who passed away on October 2nd, loathed Trump as a person, but fully intended to cast her vote in his favor.
I’m not voting for Trump to be my pastor or Sunday School teacher. Jesus is not coming back on Air Force One. I am voting for Trump to serve a brief four years as President, during which time the conservatives in this country can hopefully get their act together and stop the destruction of our republic and develop/identify leaders to continue this process. This is far from a certain outcome, even with a Trump win.
If Harris wins this election, I fear that Americans will get a very hard (and possibly terminal) lesson in the unavoidable truths that (1) ideas have consequences and (2) just because you aren’t interested in politics doesn’t mean that politics isn’t interested in you.
We will vote early as well. I love the “Election-day process” and waiting in line and visiting with strangers, but something – with a little nudge from a very conservative friend – is compelling me to vote early.
The best reasons to vote early are to bank your vote so that if an unforeseen issue arises you can be counted and that voting early precludes someone else voting in your name.
Another thing in regard to Trump’s enemies and their tactics: While he gives them plenty to legitimately criticize, they always go way overboard and thereby discredit themselves with the very people who elected Trump and might just elect him again. Seldom do their over-the-top histrionics change many minds.
Well said. You’re far better going after President Trump on policy issues, not because the Democratic platform is better (it’s most assuredly NOT), but rather because he doesn’t articulate those nearly as well as his running mate. His extemporaneous “stream of thought” delivery is much more susceptible to attack. And those attacks are far more substantive than the unsubstantiated (and completely false) claims of “Trump’s a nazi”…or “Trump’s a rapist”…or “Trump’s a racist”.
…and I believe the ad is a lie anyway. Wasn’t Trump found liable for defamation? He called his accuser a liar and lost the resulting lawsuit. There was no evidence of sexual assault or abuse of any kind.