The self-indicting that is arising from the 2024 Election Freakout has nicely exposed the hypocrisy behind the progressive masks of decency and virtue. Let’s listen to Ashli, the lovely young thing above, who has enthusiastically embraced the South Korean “4B Movement.”  The name ‘4B’ comes from the Korean words for four ‘Nos’: no heterosexual sex, no marriage, no children, and no relationships, all starting with the letter ‘b.’ Her journey is described in a revealing piece in the Daily Mail.

The brutal murder of a woman in a subway station by a man who reportedly said he was ‘sick of being ignored by women.’ sparked the ptotest by many Korean women against all men. That seems fair and logical. No, in fact it makes no sense at all, but it does to Ashli.  “Out of this tragedy, a wave of female anger turned into action. Women took control of their lives,” she writes. I’ve come to the conclusion that men can be dangerous. That’s why, two years ago at the age of 34, I chose to disengage from men entirely.

She gives her reasons. “I knew so many women who were hurt by the men they loved and trusted. Men they vowed to love and who vowed to love them. Men they slept next to at night.” Then, “the overturning of Roe cemented everything I already knew. Five justices—four of them men—decided we didn’t deserve control over our own bodies. The new MAGA Republican Party, with its hyper-masculine, power-hungry grip, cheered it on.”

Psst, Ashli? Have you read the Dobbs opinion? The SCOTUS majority didn’t make any decisions about abortion at all. It just correctly ruled that Roe was unconstitutional, which has been general knowledge among lawyers and legal scholars for decades. There was nothing about “deserving” to have abortions. (And the unborn who lose their lives in abortions definitely don’t “deserve” to be killed.)

Next: “I’ve come to the conclusion that men can be dangerous.”

And “Trump’s re-election was the final straw.”

So, in summary, Ashi is avoiding all men because some men can be dangerous, some men voted for Trump, Trump is a man, and four of the five SCOTUS Justices who reversed Roe were men. Substitute “blacks,” “Mexicans, Muslims” or “Jews” for “men” in Ashli’s diatribe and what she is advocating is clear. She’s advocating prejudice. Ashli’s a bigot. She blames an entire group for individual acts of members in that group. She attributes general characteristics to every member, as if the all are the same. This is no different from men who proclaim that women shouldn’t be athletes, soldiers, leaders, or judges; that they are all too emotional, not tough enough, weak, soft, inferior.

Now Ashli is inferior. She is an addled, hypocritical fool who claims to believe in justice, fairness and equity but is too dim witted to realize what she’s advocating is the opposite. I don’t project her flaws onto other women, though.

I hope she keeps her vow not to procreate. The gene pool is better off without her.